Allies
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 125 keywords for Allies in Google Play
Allies tracks 125 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 125 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.4, difficulty 42.7.
Initiatives for TB Champions to effectively contribute in TB elimination program
Tracked keywords
125
0 ranked • 125 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.4
Top keyword: commitment
Avg difficulty
42.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.9
commitment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 210
- 62.6
crucial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 331
- 63.1
greatest
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 592
- 63.5
eliminate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 638
- 61.7
communities
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 162
Unranked opportunities
commitment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 210
crucial
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 331
greatest
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 592
eliminate
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 638
communities
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.9 • Competitors: 162
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 339,043 • Major competitors: 11,559
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
based
Total apps: 152,098 • Major competitors: 5,361
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
quality
Total apps: 144,736 • Major competitors: 6,422
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
service
Total apps: 134,155 • Major competitors: 5,360
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
including
Total apps: 129,573 • Major competitors: 6,950
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| top | 69 | 100 | 58 | 79 87,994 competing apps Median installs: 2,776 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,765 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 109,650 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,423 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 56,144 competing apps Median installs: 1,254 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,569 major competitor apps |
| active | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 32,577 competing apps Median installs: 1,482 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,393 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,239 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| particularly | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,456 competing apps Median installs: 1,516 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 111,277 competing apps Median installs: 490 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,440 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,411 competing apps Median installs: 1,108 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,316 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 103,569 competing apps Median installs: 2,224 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,286 major competitor apps |
| service | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 134,155 competing apps Median installs: 1,199 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,360 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,316 competing apps Median installs: 1,103 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,380 major competitor apps |
| program | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 43,327 competing apps Median installs: 1,464 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 129,573 competing apps Median installs: 2,109 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,950 major competitor apps |
| task | 72 | 100 | 52 | 69 22,389 competing apps Median installs: 1,218 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,076 major competitor apps |
| services | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 103,678 competing apps Median installs: 918 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,001 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,961 competing apps Median installs: 2,141 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,775 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 17,154 competing apps Median installs: 490 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 352 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 34,012 competing apps Median installs: 1,150 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 691 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 339,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,013 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 11,559 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,813 competing apps Median installs: 598 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,167 major competitor apps |
| government | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 20,740 competing apps Median installs: 3,368 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 794 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 85,069 competing apps Median installs: 512 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,549 major competitor apps |
| ahead | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 18,831 competing apps Median installs: 1,159 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 783 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 144,736 competing apps Median installs: 1,643 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,422 major competitor apps |
| plan | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 66,958 competing apps Median installs: 1,275 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,088 major competitor apps |
App Description
Initiatives for TB Champions to effectively contribute in TB elimination program
The HLM declaration recognizes the role of communities and community-centered approaches as central to achieving these ambitious targets. This is echoed in the National Strategic Plan for TB for 2017-25 (NSP) for TB elimination and the Technical Operations Guidelines (TOG) that consider communities not as passive recipients of care but as active and motivated stakeholders in the nation’s response to TB.
This project is based on the understanding that a crucial but missing element in efforts to end TB is community initiative to shape and enable policy and service delivery environments that can mitigate stigma and ensure equitable access to quality prevention, detection and treatment of and for TB. Deploying inter-sectoral, gendered, individual and family-cantered behavioural, and management approaches, the project will position the community as ALLIES to the program, enhancing the efficient delivery of TB services in ways that speak to individual needs - particularly of members of key affected and marginalized populations - across the care cascade.
