ResiLinkDesk
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 29 keywords for ResiLinkDesk in Google Play
ResiLinkDesk tracks 29 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 29 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 45.1.
Cross-platform mobile application for apartment management and maintenance
Tracked keywords
29
0 ranked • 29 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: respond
Avg difficulty
45.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 438
- 62.4
managers
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 155
- 67.0
maintenance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 283
- 55.5
apartment
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 36.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 159
- 66.7
enabling
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 481
Unranked opportunities
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 438
managers
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.0 • Competitors: 155
maintenance
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 283
apartment
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 36.8 • Competitors: 159
enabling
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 481
High competition keywords
mobile
Total apps: 280,391 • Major competitors: 11,045
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
track
Total apps: 193,127 • Major competitors: 6,131
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
manage
Total apps: 182,381 • Major competitors: 7,136
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
view
Total apps: 180,212 • Major competitors: 6,138
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
receive
Total apps: 148,237 • Major competitors: 4,797
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,468 competing apps Median installs: 1,366 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,503 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 109,423 competing apps Median installs: 566 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,579 major competitor apps |
| manage | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 182,381 competing apps Median installs: 743 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,136 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,391 competing apps Median installs: 1,392 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,045 major competitor apps |
| request | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 44,135 competing apps Median installs: 1,134 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,451 major competitor apps |
| pay | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 70,410 competing apps Median installs: 1,703 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,034 major competitor apps |
| update | 70 | 100 | 55 | 75 51,477 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,605 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 193,127 competing apps Median installs: 539 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 6,131 major competitor apps |
| interact | 72 | 100 | 50 | 69 22,486 competing apps Median installs: 961 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,034 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 180,212 competing apps Median installs: 912 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,138 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 120,321 competing apps Median installs: 1,895 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,248 major competitor apps |
| receive | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 148,237 competing apps Median installs: 851 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,797 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 140,489 competing apps Median installs: 1,999 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,580 major competitor apps |
| web | 71 | 100 | 52 | 74 41,295 competing apps Median installs: 1,371 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| project | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 21,701 competing apps Median installs: 755 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 533 major competitor apps |
| maintenance | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 15,990 competing apps Median installs: 392 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 283 major competitor apps |
| submit | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 25,411 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 505 major competitor apps |
| platform | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 123,185 competing apps Median installs: 680 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,952 major competitor apps |
| property | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 21,861 competing apps Median installs: 1,728 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,028 major competitor apps |
| respond | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 9,792 competing apps Median installs: 2,330 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 438 major competitor apps |
| settings | 71 | 100 | 57 | 73 39,203 competing apps Median installs: 4,274 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,856 major competitor apps |
| tenants | 72 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,937 competing apps Median installs: 241 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| apartment | 73 | 100 | 37 | 55 3,029 competing apps Median installs: 904 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| enabling | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 15,280 competing apps Median installs: 759 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 481 major competitor apps |
| managers | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 8,162 competing apps Median installs: 532 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
App Description
Cross-platform mobile application for apartment management and maintenance
Develop a cross-platform mobile and web application for apartment management and maintenance, enabling tenants and property managers to interact efficiently.
2. User Roles
Tenant: Submit complaints, pay bills, view lease, request maintenance
Property Manager: Manage units, respond to requests, track finances
Vendor: Receive and update work orders
Admin: Oversee platform, manage users and settings