MA eFOG
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 78 keywords for MA eFOG in Google Play
MA eFOG tracks 78 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 78 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 49.1.
Massachusetts Interoperability Field Operations Guide
Tracked keywords
78
0 ranked • 78 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.7
Top keyword: field
Avg difficulty
49.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 68.5
standard
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,127
- 68.6
planning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 945
- 68.6
electronic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 875
- 67.5
technical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 694
Unranked opportunities
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
standard
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Competitors: 1,127
planning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 945
electronic
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 875
technical
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 694
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offline | 68 | 100 | 60 | 81 54,787 competing apps Median installs: 36,532 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,486 major competitor apps |
| security | 70 | 100 | 64 | 74 22,681 competing apps Median installs: 36,021 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,764 major competitor apps |
| library | 72 | 100 | 65 | 71 13,762 competing apps Median installs: 29,536 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,491 major competitor apps |
| easy | 64 | 100 | 62 | 89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 17,537 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 75,490 competing apps Median installs: 41,387 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 9,726 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 64 | 81 56,908 competing apps Median installs: 30,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,627 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| delivered | 72 | 100 | 49 | 66 7,157 competing apps Median installs: 26,645 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 781 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| program | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 19,009 competing apps Median installs: 26,294 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,273 major competitor apps |
| easy access | 72 | 100 | 44 | 65 6,566 competing apps Median installs: 22,544 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 448 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| tables | 71 | 100 | 44 | 58 2,619 competing apps Median installs: 34,612 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 286 major competitor apps |
| assistance | 72 | 100 | 48 | 64 5,314 competing apps Median installs: 29,345 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 524 major competitor apps |
| radio | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 14,441 competing apps Median installs: 12,960 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 593 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| communications | 71 | 100 | 44 | 59 3,007 competing apps Median installs: 23,146 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 243 major competitor apps |
| without | 65 | 100 | 63 | 86 113,596 competing apps Median installs: 37,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 12,654 major competitor apps |
| internet | 67 | 100 | 57 | 82 62,322 competing apps Median installs: 30,196 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,670 major competitor apps |
| operations | 72 | 100 | 46 | 65 6,541 competing apps Median installs: 24,141 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 556 major competitor apps |
| offering | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 17,968 competing apps Median installs: 28,278 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,931 major competitor apps |
| guide | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 27,742 competing apps Median installs: 22,659 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,061 major competitor apps |
App Description
Massachusetts Interoperability Field Operations Guide
The MA eFOG mobile app is an electronic reference of the Massachusetts Interoperability Field Operations Guide. The MA eFOG is a technical reference for emergency communications planning and for radio technicians responsible for radios that will be used in disaster response. It includes rules and regulations for use by the State of Massachusetts and other interoperability channels, tables of frequencies and standard channel names, and other reference material.
The MA eFOG mobile app gives users easy access to public safety communications information, offering a content index with links for quick jumps to reference sections, tables, figures, or images. The ability to save Favorites and create in-line notes enables personalized access to critical information. MA eFOG can be downloaded and then taken to the field as an offline reference, to be used without the need of an Internet connection.
MA eFOG was developed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) under the Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program (ICTAP).