Sika SandApp
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 32 keywords for Sika SandApp in Google Play
Sika SandApp tracks 32 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 32 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 48.9.
Fast and efficient sand analysis
Tracked keywords
32
0 ranked • 32 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: pdf
Avg difficulty
48.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
pdf
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 918
- 67.5
mix
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,571
- 68.4
shared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 982
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 67.5
format
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 956
Unranked opportunities
pdf
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.8 • Competitors: 918
mix
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 1,571
shared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Competitors: 982
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
format
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Competitors: 956
High competition keywords
provides
Total apps: 71,787 • Major competitors: 6,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
fast
Total apps: 56,216 • Major competitors: 7,690
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
digital
Total apps: 42,168 • Major competitors: 4,209
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
design
Total apps: 41,673 • Major competitors: 4,566
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
following
Total apps: 33,448 • Major competitors: 3,198
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| digital | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,209 major competitor apps |
| particle | 69 | 100 | 36 | 49 762 competing apps Median installs: 45,019 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 56 | 79 41,673 competing apps Median installs: 30,529 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,566 major competitor apps |
| aspect | 71 | 100 | 47 | 62 4,016 competing apps Median installs: 31,499 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 524 major competitor apps |
| code | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 19,267 competing apps Median installs: 32,705 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| format | 72 | 100 | 49 | 67 8,870 competing apps Median installs: 34,823 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 956 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| fast | 68 | 100 | 61 | 81 56,216 competing apps Median installs: 44,906 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,690 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 31,519 competing apps Median installs: 30,635 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,488 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 58 | 77 33,448 competing apps Median installs: 32,090 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,198 major competitor apps |
| solution | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 26,114 competing apps Median installs: 18,502 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,816 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 26,003 competing apps Median installs: 32,925 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,321 major competitor apps |
| 73 | 100 | 49 | 68 9,110 competing apps Median installs: 32,074 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 918 major competitor apps | |
| mix | 73 | 100 | 57 | 68 8,939 competing apps Median installs: 55,470 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,571 major competitor apps |
| apps | 69 | 100 | 81 | 77 31,191 competing apps Median installs: 49,219 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 4,578 major competitor apps |
| shape | 72 | 100 | 49 | 66 7,313 competing apps Median installs: 44,535 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 998 major competitor apps |
| analytical | 69 | 100 | 34 | 51 969 competing apps Median installs: 25,411 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 69 major competitor apps |
| size | 71 | 100 | 55 | 73 19,569 competing apps Median installs: 35,942 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,034 major competitor apps |
| per | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 17,531 competing apps Median installs: 42,420 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,028 major competitor apps |
| distribution | 71 | 100 | 38 | 60 3,409 competing apps Median installs: 23,543 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 232 major competitor apps |
| results | 71 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,368 competing apps Median installs: 27,098 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,684 major competitor apps |
| values | 72 | 100 | 41 | 65 6,209 competing apps Median installs: 23,707 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 428 major competitor apps |
| shared | 73 | 100 | 73 | 68 10,051 competing apps Median installs: 28,155 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 982 major competitor apps |
| analysis | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 9,609 competing apps Median installs: 26,199 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 737 major competitor apps |
App Description
Fast and efficient sand analysis
The App provides the following analytical results:
-Particle size distribution (according to EN/ASTM sieves)
-Particle shape parameter (roundness, sphericity, aspect ratio)
-Distribution of particle shape parameter per sieve opening
Fineness modulus
-D10, D50, D85 and D100 values
The results can be shared as PDF report, as .csv format (Excel), with other Sika Sand Apps and with the Sika Mix Design App.
The Sand App is part of the SIKA CODE Concept.