LafargeHolcim E-Auction
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 104 keywords for LafargeHolcim E-Auction in Google Play
LafargeHolcim E-Auction tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 46.1.
Efficient transport vendor selection for cement plants.
Tracked keywords
104
0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: competitive
Avg difficulty
46.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,091
- 68.1
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,204
- 68.6
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 651
- 68.7
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 980
- 68.0
transport
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,414
Unranked opportunities
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,091
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,204
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 651
cost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 980
transport
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Competitors: 1,414
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
available
Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| competitive | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 9,306 competing apps Median installs: 32,378 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,091 major competitor apps |
| notifications | 69 | 100 | 63 | 77 33,158 competing apps Median installs: 22,800 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,906 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 42,168 competing apps Median installs: 26,988 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,209 major competitor apps |
| transparent | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,740 competing apps Median installs: 12,454 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 501 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 19,185 competing apps Median installs: 30,368 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,887 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 52 | 71 14,801 competing apps Median installs: 42,546 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,812 major competitor apps |
| transparency | 71 | 100 | 38 | 59 2,706 competing apps Median installs: 25,046 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 231 major competitor apps |
| valuable | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 13,163 competing apps Median installs: 30,067 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,091 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 5,377 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| streamlines | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,112 competing apps Median installs: 15,766 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 72 | 100 | 40 | 62 4,373 competing apps Median installs: 18,172 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 318 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 18,891 competing apps Median installs: 33,950 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 67 | 87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 11,667 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 14,246 competing apps Median installs: 26,024 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,180 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| continuous | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,648 competing apps Median installs: 27,474 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 652 major competitor apps |
| digitizing | 68 | 100 | 26 | 41 261 competing apps Median installs: 11,353 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| customers | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 19,718 competing apps Median installs: 23,439 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,857 major competitor apps |
| brings | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 27,356 competing apps Median installs: 33,047 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,190 major competitor apps |
App Description
Efficient transport vendor selection for cement plants.
Traditionally, the selection of transport vendors for cement plants involved a manual and time-consuming process, with limited visibility into available options and competitive pricing. However, LafargeHolcim's E-Auctioning system eliminates these challenges by digitizing and automating the vendor selection process.
Through this system, transport vendors are invited to participate in online auctions, where they can submit competitive bids for transportation services. This allows LafargeHolcim to access a wider pool of vendors and evaluate their pricing and service offerings in a transparent and competitive environment. The system also provides real-time updates and notifications to keep vendors informed throughout the auction process.
The E-Auctioning system brings several benefits to LafargeHolcim. Firstly, it enhances cost efficiency by fostering competition among vendors, driving down transportation costs and optimizing logistics expenses. Secondly, it ensures transparency and fairness in vendor selection, as all participants have equal opportunities to present their bids. Finally, it streamlines the entire process, saving valuable time and resources for both LafargeHolcim and the participating vendors.
By leveraging technology and embracing digital transformation, LafargeHolcim's E-Auctioning system sets new standards for transport vendor selection in the cement industry. It exemplifies their commitment to continuous improvement and optimizing operations, ultimately benefiting their customers with reliable and cost-effective transportation solutions.
