EBW App
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 93 keywords for EBW App in Google Play
EBW App tracks 93 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 93 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 43.0.
Result-oriented management
Tracked keywords
93
0 ranked • 93 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: presence
Avg difficulty
43.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
presence
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 270
- 60.8
contract
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 324
- 65.1
happening
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 280
- 65.7
direction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 752
- 65.8
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 566
Unranked opportunities
presence
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 270
contract
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 324
happening
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 280
direction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 752
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 566
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 370,270 • Major competitors: 21,630
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
way
Total apps: 205,299 • Major competitors: 10,422
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
available
Total apps: 198,627 • Major competitors: 9,718
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
based
Total apps: 152,689 • Major competitors: 5,418
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 370,270 competing apps Median installs: 2,549 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 21,630 major competitor apps |
| contact | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 137,882 competing apps Median installs: 1,525 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,772 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 110,628 competing apps Median installs: 502 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,438 major competitor apps |
| valuable | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 31,015 competing apps Median installs: 1,354 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,051 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 205,299 competing apps Median installs: 1,662 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,422 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 63,481 competing apps Median installs: 2,112 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 198,627 competing apps Median installs: 2,067 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 9,718 major competitor apps |
| goal | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 42,720 competing apps Median installs: 1,164 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,784 major competitor apps |
| contract | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 6,535 competing apps Median installs: 1,678 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 324 major competitor apps |
| document | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 17,607 competing apps Median installs: 879 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 780 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 84,612 competing apps Median installs: 521 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,554 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 44,311 competing apps Median installs: 3,270 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,288 major competitor apps |
| citizen | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,803 competing apps Median installs: 1,664 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| comprehensive | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 84,168 competing apps Median installs: 685 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,970 major competitor apps |
| happening | 74 | 100 | 44 | 65 12,174 competing apps Median installs: 644 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 280 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,876 competing apps Median installs: 1,426 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,311 major competitor apps |
| problem | 73 | 100 | 45 | 69 20,244 competing apps Median installs: 1,744 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 884 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 49,269 competing apps Median installs: 3,115 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,620 major competitor apps |
| presence | 75 | 100 | 40 | 64 10,009 competing apps Median installs: 1,153 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 270 major competitor apps |
| companies | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 18,047 competing apps Median installs: 928 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 411 major competitor apps |
| year | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 28,888 competing apps Median installs: 3,826 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,454 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 40,071 competing apps Median installs: 953 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,446 major competitor apps |
| case | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 27,920 competing apps Median installs: 1,732 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,039 major competitor apps |
| receive | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 145,231 competing apps Median installs: 831 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,382 major competitor apps |
App Description
Result-oriented management
The goals on the EBW area are very simple, but they are kept concrete and indicate the main direction of how the existing area should be dealt with. They are based on the habitat type of the area and the condition of the habitat. For example, a goal can be called "Preservation of the poor meadow" if the condition of this meadow is good. If the condition is not optimal (e.g. intrusion of trees or neophytes), the goal can also be "development of a poor meadow".
The indicators are very important. They indicate the condition of the surface. The indicators available in the EBW measure have been selected for each habitat in such a way that the connection with the cultivation of the area is very high. Indicators can describe both the presence of species or structures (e.g. meadow sage) and the absence of species or structures (e.g. problem plants). Indicators must be constantly checked by the farmer. In the case of an on-site inspection, they are inspected by the AMA.
To ensure that this new system works well, the companies receive comprehensive advice from an ecologist at the beginning. The relevant areas are all walked on together. After the farm inspection, the farmer receives a project confirmation in which goals and indicators are given for all agreed areas. The farmer then uses this app to document what is happening on the field and how the indicators are developing.
More information about the project and the contact details of the coordination office can be found on the project website at www.ebw-oepul.at
The interactive app and the user community run on the SPOTTERON Citizen Science platform at www.spotteron.app.
