EBW App

612 installs
Ratings not yet available
30 monthly active users
Revenue not available
Install Trends
Weekly +2.00
Steady
Monthly +8.00
Steady
EBW App icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 93 keywords for EBW App in Google Play

Developer: SPOTTERON Category: tools Rating: 2.41

EBW App tracks 93 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 93 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 43.0.

Result-oriented management

Tracked keywords

93

0  ranked •  93  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.1

Top keyword: presence

Avg difficulty

43.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • presence

    Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 270

    63.7
  • contract

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 324

    60.8
  • happening

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 280

    65.1
  • direction

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 752

    65.7
  • measure

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 566

    65.8

Unranked opportunities

  • presence

    Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 270

  • contract

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 324

  • happening

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 280

  • direction

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 752

  • measure

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 566

High competition keywords

  • new

    Total apps: 370,270 • Major competitors: 21,630

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9

  • information

    Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3

  • way

    Total apps: 205,299 • Major competitors: 10,422

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5

  • available

    Total apps: 198,627 • Major competitors: 9,718

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8

  • based

    Total apps: 152,689 • Major competitors: 5,418

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
new651006089

370,270 competing apps

Median installs: 2,549

Avg rating: 2.0

21,630

major competitor apps

contact671005482

137,882 competing apps

Median installs: 1,525

Avg rating: 1.9

5,772

major competitor apps

information651005586

266,609 competing apps

Median installs: 1,036

Avg rating: 1.8

7,571

major competitor apps

management681005080

110,628 competing apps

Median installs: 502

Avg rating: 1.7

2,438

major competitor apps

valuable711004572

31,015 competing apps

Median installs: 1,354

Avg rating: 1.8

1,051

major competitor apps

way661005785

205,299 competing apps

Median installs: 1,662

Avg rating: 2.0

10,422

major competitor apps

connection691005477

63,481 competing apps

Median installs: 2,112

Avg rating: 1.9

2,966

major competitor apps

available661006084

198,627 competing apps

Median installs: 2,067

Avg rating: 2.0

9,718

major competitor apps

goal701004774

42,720 competing apps

Median installs: 1,164

Avg rating: 1.9

1,784

major competitor apps

contract741003961

6,535 competing apps

Median installs: 1,678

Avg rating: 1.8

324

major competitor apps

document731004668

17,607 competing apps

Median installs: 879

Avg rating: 1.8

780

major competitor apps

community691005278

84,612 competing apps

Median installs: 521

Avg rating: 1.8

2,554

major competitor apps

run701005274

44,311 competing apps

Median installs: 3,270

Avg rating: 2.1

3,288

major competitor apps

citizen731003757

3,803 competing apps

Median installs: 1,664

Avg rating: 1.8

197

major competitor apps

comprehensive691004878

84,168 competing apps

Median installs: 685

Avg rating: 1.7

1,970

major competitor apps

happening741004465

12,174 competing apps

Median installs: 644

Avg rating: 1.8

280

major competitor apps

area711004872

32,876 competing apps

Median installs: 1,426

Avg rating: 1.9

1,311

major competitor apps

problem731004569

20,244 competing apps

Median installs: 1,744

Avg rating: 1.9

884

major competitor apps

type701005375

49,269 competing apps

Median installs: 3,115

Avg rating: 2.0

2,620

major competitor apps

presence751004064

10,009 competing apps

Median installs: 1,153

Avg rating: 1.7

270

major competitor apps

companies731004268

18,047 competing apps

Median installs: 928

Avg rating: 1.7

411

major competitor apps

year721005071

28,888 competing apps

Median installs: 3,826

Avg rating: 2.0

1,454

major competitor apps

achieve711004773

40,071 competing apps

Median installs: 953

Avg rating: 1.9

1,446

major competitor apps

case721004571

27,920 competing apps

Median installs: 1,732

Avg rating: 1.8

1,039

major competitor apps

receive671005382

145,231 competing apps

Median installs: 831

Avg rating: 1.8

4,382

major competitor apps

93 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

Result-oriented management

Normally, concrete measures or waivers are agreed in the nature conservation contract on valuable areas - e.g. no fertilization or a later mowing time. In the "result-oriented management" (EBW) concrete goals and indicators are agreed on the area instead of measures. The measures to achieve the goals are decided year by year by the farmer himself.
The goals on the EBW area are very simple, but they are kept concrete and indicate the main direction of how the existing area should be dealt with. They are based on the habitat type of the area and the condition of the habitat. For example, a goal can be called "Preservation of the poor meadow" if the condition of this meadow is good. If the condition is not optimal (e.g. intrusion of trees or neophytes), the goal can also be "development of a poor meadow".
The indicators are very important. They indicate the condition of the surface. The indicators available in the EBW measure have been selected for each habitat in such a way that the connection with the cultivation of the area is very high. Indicators can describe both the presence of species or structures (e.g. meadow sage) and the absence of species or structures (e.g. problem plants). Indicators must be constantly checked by the farmer. In the case of an on-site inspection, they are inspected by the AMA.
To ensure that this new system works well, the companies receive comprehensive advice from an ecologist at the beginning. The relevant areas are all walked on together. After the farm inspection, the farmer receives a project confirmation in which goals and indicators are given for all agreed areas. The farmer then uses this app to document what is happening on the field and how the indicators are developing.
More information about the project and the contact details of the coordination office can be found on the project website at www.ebw-oepul.at

The interactive app and the user community run on the SPOTTERON Citizen Science platform at www.spotteron.app.