Steinemann Chatter Marks

Developer: Steinemann Technoloy AG

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

1.1K installs

Ratings not yet available

54 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +1.00

Steady

Monthly +4.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 42 keywords for Steinemann Chatter Marks in Google Play

Developer: Steinemann Technoloy AG Category: tools Rating: 0.03

Steinemann Chatter Marks tracks 42 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 42 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 45.4.

Quickly and efficiently analyze chatter marks and identify the cause.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 42 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: calculation

Avg difficulty

45.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

calculation

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 348
65.3
machine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,112
65.9
excellence

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 77
63.9
cause

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 453
60.7
stands

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 464
63.3

Unranked opportunities

calculation

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 348
machine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 1,112
excellence

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 77
cause

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 453
stands

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 464

High competition keywords

new

Total apps: 368,929 • Major competitors: 21,444

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
data

Total apps: 181,410 • Major competitors: 6,597

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
support

Total apps: 170,973 • Major competitors: 7,327

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
even

Total apps: 157,439 • Major competitors: 10,553

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
based

Total apps: 152,098 • Major competitors: 5,361

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
new	65	100	60	89 368,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,547 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	21,444 major competitor apps
support	67	100	55	83 170,973 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,327 major competitor apps
contact	67	100	54	82 138,467 competing apps Median installs: 1,503 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	5,795 major competitor apps
process	70	100	48	76 56,683 competing apps Median installs: 852 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,737 major competitor apps
quickly	68	100	59	81 116,364 competing apps Median installs: 1,214 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,591 major competitor apps
offering	70	100	48	75 50,747 competing apps Median installs: 831 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,892 major competitor apps
guide	69	100	48	77 71,709 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,014 major competitor apps
calculation	74	100	42	65 12,523 competing apps Median installs: 1,468 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	348 major competitor apps
identify	72	100	52	70 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	983 major competitor apps
data	67	100	58	84 181,410 competing apps Median installs: 1,151 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	6,597 major competitor apps
requires	71	100	49	71 30,683 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,407 major competitor apps
future	70	100	48	76 55,945 competing apps Median installs: 1,161 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,133 major competitor apps
based	67	100	56	83 152,098 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,361 major competitor apps
stored	73	100	50	69 20,584 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	855 major competitor apps
naturally	73	100	37	58 4,082 competing apps Median installs: 1,358 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	172 major competitor apps
even	67	100	59	83 157,439 competing apps Median installs: 3,382 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	10,553 major competitor apps
automatically	69	100	56	77 67,190 competing apps Median installs: 2,192 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	3,195 major competitor apps
several	71	100	47	72 33,483 competing apps Median installs: 2,968 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	1,655 major competitor apps
types	70	100	53	74 44,961 competing apps Median installs: 3,506 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,577 major competitor apps
distance	73	100	45	68 17,375 competing apps Median installs: 1,560 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	776 major competitor apps
machine	74	100	47	66 13,726 competing apps Median installs: 4,781 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,112 major competitor apps
efficiently	73	100	42	68 17,760 competing apps Median installs: 396 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	402 major competitor apps
displays	73	100	42	67 16,552 competing apps Median installs: 1,304 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	584 major competitor apps
wide	69	100	52	79 85,006 competing apps Median installs: 1,443 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,283 major competitor apps
analyze	73	100	45	68 19,900 competing apps Median installs: 1,208 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	750 major competitor apps

App Description

Quickly and efficiently analyze chatter marks and identify the cause.

Steinemann stands for excellence in service. To support you even more efficiently in the future with our expertise, we are now offering the new Steinemann app for analyzing chatter marks. Chatter marks are caused by vibrations in a sander. Vibrations can be generated, for instance, by the joints of the sanding belts, the contact drums, guide rollers or tension drums. The cause can be determined based on the distance between the chatter marks and several types of process and machine data. The app identifies the cause and displays the result. For this calculation, the app requires data on the geometry and process of the wide belt sanding machine. Such data is naturally stored in the app for most Steinemann machines and automatically incorporated in the calculation based on the machine's serial number.