Board Quality

Developer: Steinemann Technoloy AG

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

65 installs

Ratings not yet available

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +2.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 26 keywords for Board Quality in Google Play

Developer: Steinemann Technoloy AG Category: tools

Board Quality tracks 26 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 26 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 47.2.

Calculate the possible production speeds of your sanding line.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 26 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: determine

Avg difficulty

47.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

determine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 512
65.7
production

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 325
64.0
parameters

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 173
60.7
surface

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 202
57.5
depending

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 977
68.5

Unranked opportunities

determine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 512
production

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 325
parameters

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 173
surface

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 202
depending

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.4 • Competitors: 977

High competition keywords

using

Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
way

Total apps: 206,164 • Major competitors: 10,421

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
offers

Total apps: 195,234 • Major competitors: 7,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
unique

Total apps: 168,127 • Major competitors: 11,657

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
even

Total apps: 157,439 • Major competitors: 10,553

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
way	66	100	57	85 206,164 competing apps Median installs: 1,630 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	10,421 major competitor apps
using	66	100	58	85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	10,965 major competitor apps
excellent	72	100	45	69 20,952 competing apps Median installs: 2,674 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,080 major competitor apps
intuitive	68	100	52	81 117,141 competing apps Median installs: 740 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	4,121 major competitor apps
process	70	100	48	76 56,683 competing apps Median installs: 852 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	1,737 major competitor apps
speed	70	100	55	76 57,510 competing apps Median installs: 3,897 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	4,369 major competitor apps
surface	73	100	38	58 4,085 competing apps Median installs: 2,285 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	202 major competitor apps
quality	67	100	56	82 144,736 competing apps Median installs: 1,643 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	6,422 major competitor apps
calculate	72	100	44	70 24,727 competing apps Median installs: 1,193 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	699 major competitor apps
possible	70	100	50	75 50,116 competing apps Median installs: 2,016 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,197 major competitor apps
unique	67	100	56	83 168,127 competing apps Median installs: 3,105 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	11,657 major competitor apps
understand	70	100	48	76 57,390 competing apps Median installs: 1,555 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,647 major competitor apps
based	67	100	56	83 152,098 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,361 major competitor apps
even	67	100	59	83 157,439 competing apps Median installs: 3,382 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	10,553 major competitor apps
line	71	100	49	72 35,235 competing apps Median installs: 2,439 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	2,050 major competitor apps
determine	74	100	41	66 13,262 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	512 major competitor apps
analysis	72	100	44	70 25,395 competing apps Median installs: 1,233 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	766 major competitor apps
production	74	100	40	64 10,489 competing apps Median installs: 980 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	325 major competitor apps
offers	66	100	55	84 195,234 competing apps Median installs: 1,110 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	7,537 major competitor apps
parameters	74	100	38	61 6,487 competing apps Median installs: 1,163 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	173 major competitor apps
synonymous	70	100	28	45 657 competing apps Median installs: 1,359 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	14 major competitor apps
depending	73	100	50	68 19,943 competing apps Median installs: 2,322 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	977 major competitor apps
speeds	73	100	74	56 3,400 competing apps Median installs: 4,632 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	253 major competitor apps
optimise	71	100	29	48 1,010 competing apps Median installs: 622 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	18 major competitor apps
intuitive way	71	100	29	46 808 competing apps Median installs: 1,486 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	24 major competitor apps

App Description

Calculate the possible production speeds of your sanding line.

Steinemann is synonymous with excellent service. Now you can determine the achievable speed of your production depending on your process parameters by using Steinemann's unique process expertise. Based on your sanding line configuration, the Surface Quality Analysis App offers you an intuitive way to understand and optimise your process even better!