SWB Mainboard
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 80 keywords for SWB Mainboard in Google Play
SWB Mainboard tracks 80 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 80 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 45.6.
Manage architectural photos with admin review and approval.
Tracked keywords
80
0 ranked • 80 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: structured
Avg difficulty
45.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.4
structured
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 263
- 61.3
admin
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 160
- 66.1
arabic
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 572
- 60.3
publish
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 223
- 66.2
reviews
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 695
Unranked opportunities
structured
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 263
admin
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 160
arabic
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 572
publish
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 223
reviews
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Competitors: 695
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 391,175 • Major competitors: 18,123
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
like
Total apps: 286,408 • Major competitors: 22,383
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.7
designed
Total apps: 264,190 • Major competitors: 8,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
simple
Total apps: 250,021 • Major competitors: 12,073
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
using
Total apps: 224,577 • Major competitors: 12,364
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 117,345 competing apps Median installs: 1,788 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,679 major competitor apps |
| images | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 72,794 competing apps Median installs: 2,861 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,390 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 164,833 competing apps Median installs: 1,609 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,891 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,375 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,543 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 103,943 competing apps Median installs: 1,509 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,171 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 264,190 competing apps Median installs: 798 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,571 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 55,138 competing apps Median installs: 3,396 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,222 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 109,412 competing apps Median installs: 566 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,581 major competitor apps |
| manage | 66 | 100 | 55 | 84 182,301 competing apps Median installs: 741 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,119 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 128,484 competing apps Median installs: 2,330 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,049 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 203,405 competing apps Median installs: 1,963 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 11,336 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,577 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,364 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 391,175 competing apps Median installs: 1,412 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,123 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 113,713 competing apps Median installs: 1,413 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,641 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 114,871 competing apps Median installs: 825 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,483 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 92,521 competing apps Median installs: 2,089 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,917 major competitor apps |
| photos | 69 | 100 | 57 | 76 62,379 competing apps Median installs: 3,922 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,523 major competitor apps |
| organize | 72 | 100 | 52 | 71 29,097 competing apps Median installs: 901 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,226 major competitor apps |
| efficient | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 59,588 competing apps Median installs: 534 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,271 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 111,391 competing apps Median installs: 1,204 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,615 major competitor apps |
| structured | 74 | 100 | 40 | 65 12,642 competing apps Median installs: 547 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 197,852 competing apps Median installs: 3,064 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 14,336 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,703 competing apps Median installs: 1,789 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,925 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 167,241 competing apps Median installs: 1,409 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,651 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 142,367 competing apps Median installs: 2,022 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,041 major competitor apps |
App Description
Manage architectural photos with admin review and approval.
An admin can create an account with full privileges to manage users by adding, editing, or removing them. Once logged in, users can create categories and subcategories to organize their architectural photos effectively.
After preparing their photo sets, users can publish them for review. The admin then reviews the submitted images using a simple like 👍 or dislike 👎 button to accept or reject each image.
Once the review is complete, the user sees the results clearly—approved and rejected photos—allowing them to adjust or improve their work based on admin feedback.
✨ Key Features:
• Admin account with full user management controls.
• Create main and subcategories with support for photo uploads.
• Clean, intuitive user interface with Arabic support.
• Users can publish content for admin review.
• Admin rates photos via like/dislike.
• Users see review results clearly, aiding collaboration.
This app empowers architectural teams to streamline image management, improve communication, and deliver high-quality project visuals with ease.