4AT Delirium Assessment Tool

Developer: Tactuum

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

2.6K installs

Ratings not yet available

125 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +3.00

Steady

Monthly +14

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 30 keywords for 4AT Delirium Assessment Tool in Google Play

Developer: Tactuum Category: medical Rating: 3.24

4AT Delirium Assessment Tool tracks 30 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 30 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 46.4.

Rapid clinical test for delirium

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 30 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: routine

Avg difficulty

46.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

routine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 496
65.5
completion

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 156
61.1
studies

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 116
61.5
detection

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 545
62.3
clinical

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 77
62.1

Unranked opportunities

routine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 496
completion

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Competitors: 156
studies

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 116
detection

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Competitors: 545
clinical

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Competitors: 77

High competition keywords

easy

Total apps: 327,746 • Major competitors: 14,534

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
designed

Total apps: 260,993 • Major competitors: 7,557

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
simple

Total apps: 256,475 • Major competitors: 11,042

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
best

Total apps: 255,718 • Major competitors: 16,884

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
used

Total apps: 116,216 • Major competitors: 4,654

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	66	100	59	86 255,718 competing apps Median installs: 3,152 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	16,884 major competitor apps
easy	65	100	57	88 327,746 competing apps Median installs: 1,989 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	14,534 major competitor apps
used	68	100	55	81 116,216 competing apps Median installs: 2,386 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,654 major competitor apps
designed	65	100	54	86 260,993 competing apps Median installs: 725 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	7,557 major competitor apps
special	68	100	54	80 108,683 competing apps Median installs: 2,056 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	6,530 major competitor apps
diagnostic	73	100	45	57 3,862 competing apps Median installs: 1,698 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	115 major competitor apps
test	68	100	52	79 96,987 competing apps Median installs: 1,973 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	4,889 major competitor apps
effective	71	100	45	73 37,723 competing apps Median installs: 922 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,132 major competitor apps
tools	69	100	53	77 68,311 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,133 major competitor apps
tool	68	100	51	80 101,555 competing apps Median installs: 1,112 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	3,596 major competitor apps
simple	66	100	56	86 256,475 competing apps Median installs: 1,674 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	11,042 major competitor apps
accuracy	73	100	43	67 16,006 competing apps Median installs: 1,302 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	609 major competitor apps
routine	74	100	42	65 12,888 competing apps Median installs: 860 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	496 major competitor apps
completion	74	100	38	61 6,863 competing apps Median installs: 501 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	156 major competitor apps
high	68	100	55	80 108,435 competing apps Median installs: 3,205 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	6,457 major competitor apps
studies	74	100	37	61 7,220 competing apps Median installs: 1,559 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	116 major competitor apps
practice	70	100	50	76 56,540 competing apps Median installs: 1,586 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,931 major competitor apps
short	71	100	49	73 39,134 competing apps Median installs: 2,230 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,878 major competitor apps
expected	73	100	36	57 4,072 competing apps Median installs: 1,797 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	150 major competitor apps
detection	74	100	46	62 8,161 competing apps Median installs: 2,111 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	545 major competitor apps
highly	73	100	45	69 20,670 competing apps Median installs: 2,388 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,224 major competitor apps
clinical	74	100	38	62 7,886 competing apps Median installs: 751 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	77 major competitor apps
rapid	74	100	38	59 5,443 competing apps Median installs: 1,622 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	237 major competitor apps
sensitive	74	100	57	64 10,083 competing apps Median installs: 1,330 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	587 major competitor apps
validated	71	100	31	50 1,455 competing apps Median installs: 1,912 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	32 major competitor apps

App Description

Rapid clinical test for delirium

The 4AT is a simple and short (<2 min) delirium detection tool designed for easy and effective clinical use. It does not require special training.
The 4AT is the best validated delirium tool in the literature. There are >25 diagnostic test accuracy studies involving >5000 patients. It is highly sensitive and specific.
The 4AT is now one of the most commonly-used tools in practice globally.
It is proven in routine care, with high completion rates and delirium detection at expected clinical rates.