Time2Eat KMS

Developer: Bottle Lab Technologies

Category: Food & Drink

104 installs

ratings

+5 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 84 keywords for Time2Eat KMS in Google Play

Developer: Bottle Lab Technologies PVT LTD Category: food_and_drink

Time2Eat KMS tracks 84 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 84 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 46.9.

Streamlines kitchen operations with real-time order management

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 84 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.5

Top keyword: orders

Avg difficulty

46.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

orders

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 900
68.0
organized

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 763
68.5
volume

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,088
66.2
efficiency

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 318
62.2
operations

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 556
65.2

Unranked opportunities

orders

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Competitors: 900
organized

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 763
volume

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Competitors: 1,088
efficiency

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 318
operations

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.2 • Competitors: 556

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
different

Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
designed

Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
whether

Total apps: 76,585 • Major competitors: 8,596

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
communication	71	100	52	73 17,694 competing apps Median installs: 18,826 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,191 major competitor apps
focus	71	100	59	73 18,611 competing apps Median installs: 23,658 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,710 major competitor apps
order	68	100	55	79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,188 major competitor apps
whether	67	100	58	83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	8,596 major competitor apps
live	67	100	63	81 57,913 competing apps Median installs: 32,026 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	6,601 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	57	85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	9,110 major competitor apps
management	69	100	52	77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,393 major competitor apps
manage	67	100	62	82 61,484 competing apps Median installs: 27,358 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,560 major competitor apps
service	68	100	59	81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	5,377 major competitor apps
food	71	100	52	73 19,500 competing apps Median installs: 26,500 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,206 major competitor apps
time	64	100	65	89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	19,592 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
intuitive	69	100	56	79 39,579 competing apps Median installs: 28,449 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	4,140 major competitor apps
streamlines	70	100	33	52 1,112 competing apps Median installs: 15,766 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	56 major competitor apps
multiple	67	100	62	82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	8,314 major competitor apps
including	67	100	64	82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	8,693 major competitor apps
volume	72	100	55	66 7,437 competing apps Median installs: 46,520 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	1,088 major competitor apps
efficiency	72	100	40	62 4,373 competing apps Median installs: 18,172 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	318 major competitor apps
kitchen	71	100	46	61 3,783 competing apps Median installs: 60,750 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	669 major competitor apps
speed	70	100	60	76 28,360 competing apps Median installs: 55,734 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,571 major competitor apps
dynamic	71	100	54	73 18,485 competing apps Median installs: 37,329 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,447 major competitor apps
enterprise	70	100	41	56 1,878 competing apps Median installs: 19,102 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	104 major competitor apps
quickly	68	100	69	80 51,305 competing apps Median installs: 33,814 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,661 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	60	83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,088 major competitor apps
operations	72	100	46	65 6,541 competing apps Median installs: 24,141 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	556 major competitor apps

App Description

Streamlines kitchen operations with real-time order management

SmartQ’s Kitchen Management System (KMS) is a comprehensive, real-time platform designed to optimize kitchen operations across enterprise and institutional food service environments. It consolidates orders from multiple channels—including self-service kiosks, mobile apps, and POS into a single, organized workflow for the kitchen team. The system enables kitchen staff to view, prioritize, and manage orders with clarity, reducing manual errors and prep delays. It provides intuitive order displays that adapt to different kitchen setups, whether for centralized kitchens or station-specific workflows.

KMS integrates tightly with the KOT systems, ensuring seamless order communication and fulfilment. It supports batch preparation, live status updates, and dynamic prep time tracking, making kitchen operations more responsive and predictable. Chefs can quickly identify pending, in-progress, and completed orders, improving coordination during high-volume service periods. Designed with speed and usability in mind, KMS reduces clutter and improves focus with its clean, high-contrast interface. Overall, SmartQ KMS plays a vital role in delivering faster service, consistent food quality, and operational efficiency at scale.