Connected Forest™ - LIMS
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 119 keywords for Connected Forest™ - LIMS in Google Play
Connected Forest™ - LIMS tracks 119 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 119 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 50.1.
Business management software for the timber and wood products industries
Tracked keywords
119
0 ranked • 119 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: specifically
Avg difficulty
50.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.6
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 651
- 67.8
sales
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 729
- 67.9
stand
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,470
- 68.3
names
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 879
- 68.4
rules
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,327
Unranked opportunities
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 651
sales
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 729
stand
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.5 • Competitors: 1,470
names
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 56.0 • Competitors: 879
rules
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.4 • Competitors: 1,327
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
features
Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| single | 69 | 100 | 56 | 77 32,754 competing apps Median installs: 37,118 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,952 major competitor apps |
| software | 72 | 100 | 55 | 70 13,182 competing apps Median installs: 24,654 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,054 major competitor apps |
| software development | 67 | 100 | 24 | 39 187 competing apps Median installs: 15,951 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| customer | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 26,928 competing apps Median installs: 29,460 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,733 major competitor apps |
| handle | 72 | 100 | 46 | 66 6,895 competing apps Median installs: 43,016 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 987 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,371 major competitor apps |
| graphical | 70 | 100 | 37 | 55 1,697 competing apps Median installs: 26,769 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 132 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,369 competing apps Median installs: 33,095 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,197 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,393 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 49,228 competing apps Median installs: 35,592 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,524 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| clients | 72 | 100 | 48 | 64 5,797 competing apps Median installs: 19,192 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 451 major competitor apps |
| company | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 17,480 competing apps Median installs: 21,812 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,330 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| combine | 72 | 100 | 51 | 67 8,726 competing apps Median installs: 57,555 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,471 major competitor apps |
| contract | 71 | 100 | 43 | 59 2,970 competing apps Median installs: 36,892 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 72 | 100 | 40 | 62 4,373 competing apps Median installs: 18,172 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 318 major competitor apps |
| accounting | 71 | 100 | 40 | 57 2,141 competing apps Median installs: 18,762 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| products | 70 | 100 | 58 | 76 26,531 competing apps Median installs: 29,150 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,907 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 88,254 competing apps Median installs: 44,186 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 11,840 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 41,743 competing apps Median installs: 24,264 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,368 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 65 | 85 96,583 competing apps Median installs: 32,526 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,194 major competitor apps |
App Description
Business management software for the timber and wood products industries
LIMS has proven its capabilities at over 500 sites in North America. Companies from single mills to big names in the forestry industry are using Trimble software every day.
With LIMS, you can configure the system to work the way your company works, and then easily add new business activities without additional programming. For example, if you decide to start trading logs or fiber from a mill that previously only consumed wood, you simply add the customer and your contract and accounting rules, and start entering transactions. The features are already in the system, without additional programming.
At Trimble, we keep the end user in mind throughout the software development process. We understand the challenges our customer face during the learning process. As a result, LIMS was specifically designed to be user-friendly software. A familiar, Windows-based graphical user interface (GUI) makes training a breeze.
LIMS can handle multiple operations with different business practices and rules that vary from coastal to interior, province to province, state to state, northern to southern, and even multiple languages.
LIMS is highly scalable. With a central database design, our clients can combine all divisions in one central reporting system at the corporate headquarters. Alternatively, each division's woodlands, timberlands or mill operations can be independent from all the others, each with its own database if preferred.
With Trimble's approach, geographic boundaries do not stand in the way of applying LIMS across an entire firm. The more people in a corporation use Trimble software, the bigger the benefits of integration in terms of efficiency and productivity.