P.A.R.T.
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 130 keywords for P.A.R.T. in Google Play
P.A.R.T. tracks 130 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 130 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 45.2.
Assess auditory processing across a wide range of tasks.
Tracked keywords
130
0 ranked • 130 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: automated
Avg difficulty
45.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
automated
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 261
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 60.5
creators
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 76.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 550
- 65.4
release
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 761
- 64.4
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 367
Unranked opportunities
automated
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 261
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
creators
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 76.3 • Competitors: 550
release
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.3 • Competitors: 761
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 367
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 385,850 • Major competitors: 16,372
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
make
Total apps: 328,331 • Major competitors: 18,397
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
information
Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed
Total apps: 261,871 • Major competitors: 7,629
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
best
Total apps: 254,675 • Major competitors: 16,896
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 254,675 competing apps Median installs: 3,217 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,896 major competitor apps |
| fitness | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 40,021 competing apps Median installs: 215 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 750 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,261 competing apps Median installs: 666 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,824 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,207 competing apps Median installs: 2,082 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,885 major competitor apps | |
| make | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 328,331 competing apps Median installs: 2,060 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 18,397 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 90,167 competing apps Median installs: 1,297 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,151 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,004 competing apps Median installs: 1,268 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,571 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 116,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,391 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,709 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 261,871 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 7,629 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 29,149 competing apps Median installs: 3,971 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,842 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 205,299 competing apps Median installs: 1,662 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,422 major competitor apps |
| welcome | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 123,637 competing apps Median installs: 811 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,005 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,101 competing apps Median installs: 2,143 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,302 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 385,850 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 16,372 major competitor apps |
| wide range | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 47,910 competing apps Median installs: 1,180 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,179 major competitor apps |
| variety | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 97,918 competing apps Median installs: 3,240 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,787 major competitor apps |
| program | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 43,195 competing apps Median installs: 1,483 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,234 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 53 | 74 41,785 competing apps Median installs: 3,572 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,369 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 56 | 81 129,574 competing apps Median installs: 2,394 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,197 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 2,121 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,024 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,113 competing apps Median installs: 1,534 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| creators | 74 | 100 | 76 | 61 6,295 competing apps Median installs: 4,274 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,128 competing apps Median installs: 3,006 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,823 major competitor apps |
App Description
Assess auditory processing across a wide range of tasks.
PART was designed to allow users to perform high-quality assessments of auditory processing abilities in a wide variety of settings. We believe that the nervous system processes sound in many complex ways and that hearing health is best described in terms of how well a listener is able to make use of the multiple dimensions on which sounds can vary.
This application includes a wide variety of auditory tasks, all of which have been shown to have utility in assessing auditory function in the laboratory. The set of tasks were chosen by the PART development team, which is led by Frederick J. Gallun at the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, David Eddins at the University of South Florida, and Aaron Seitz at the University of California Riverside (UCR). The program is a production of the UCR Brain Game Center, a research unit focused on brain fitness methods and applications.
Assessments and Batteries:
This application is continually being upgraded and at this time already includes assessment tools that can be used to measure the following abilities:
Temporal Sensitivity, Spectral Sensitivity, Spectrotemporal Sensitivity, Binaural Sensitivity, Spatial Release from Speech on Speech Masking, Informational Masking (Multiple Burst Paradigm)
Default Batteries are included that present limited instructions and examples and include a number of the assessments described above. For further information on the default batteries, the availability of additional custom batteries, Matlab scripts for analyzing the user data, and to have questions answered on the functionality of PART, including calibration, please email fgallun@gmail.com to be added to iPUG, the iPad Psychophysics Users Group.
See https://braingamecenter.ucr.edu/games/p-a-r-t/ for more information and selected references.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH/NIDCD R01 0015051. The application represents the individual work of the authors and creators and should in no way be considered to be approved by or represent offi