Well Aware
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for Well Aware in Google Play
Well Aware tracks 71 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 71 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 45.9.
Test your water for metals and bacteria at home!
Tracked keywords
71
0 ranked • 71 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: aware
Avg difficulty
45.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.1
aware
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 398
- 62.9
notice
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 452
- 65.2
united
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 618
- 65.9
machine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,113
- 65.1
testing
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 456
Unranked opportunities
aware
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 398
notice
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.6 • Competitors: 452
united
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 618
machine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 1,113
testing
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.9 • Competitors: 456
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 327,746 • Major competitors: 14,534
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
help
Total apps: 282,184 • Major competitors: 14,390
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
using
Total apps: 222,015 • Major competitors: 10,980
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
available
Total apps: 199,889 • Major competitors: 9,726
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
data
Total apps: 181,407 • Major competitors: 6,602
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| easy | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 327,746 competing apps Median installs: 1,989 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 14,534 major competitor apps |
| connected | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 74,124 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,176 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,108 competing apps Median installs: 1,208 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,826 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,141 competing apps Median installs: 1,242 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,071 major competitor apps |
| scan | 71 | 100 | 56 | 72 34,425 competing apps Median installs: 1,814 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,194 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 222,015 competing apps Median installs: 2,293 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,980 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,889 competing apps Median installs: 2,016 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,726 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 282,184 competing apps Median installs: 1,658 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 14,390 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,987 competing apps Median installs: 1,973 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,889 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 19,677 competing apps Median installs: 2,058 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 952 major competitor apps |
| tests | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,888 competing apps Median installs: 1,588 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 592 major competitor apps |
| purchase | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 53,128 competing apps Median installs: 1,524 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,695 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 169,105 competing apps Median installs: 2,111 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,789 major competitor apps |
| citizen | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,817 competing apps Median installs: 1,658 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
| tools | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 68,311 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,133 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 144,732 competing apps Median installs: 1,645 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,426 major competitor apps |
| researchers | 72 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,748 competing apps Median installs: 903 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,561 competing apps Median installs: 1,637 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,472 major competitor apps |
| participate | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 22,271 competing apps Median installs: 1,149 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 974 major competitor apps |
| aware | 74 | 100 | 41 | 64 10,665 competing apps Median installs: 1,477 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 398 major competitor apps |
| color | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 64,719 competing apps Median installs: 2,212 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,086 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 64 | 78 83,621 competing apps Median installs: 1,631 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,211 major competitor apps |
| notice | 74 | 100 | 48 | 63 8,918 competing apps Median installs: 2,077 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 181,407 competing apps Median installs: 1,151 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,602 major competitor apps |
| home | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,819 competing apps Median installs: 1,720 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,115 major competitor apps |
App Description
Test your water for metals and bacteria at home!
This innovative at-home microbe, lead, and arsenic testing platform was developed for use with well water. Using our machine learning and color analysis algorithms, the app can read and explain results from a lead testing strip, microbe (E. coli), and arsenic test kit.
Features:
-No registration required
-By default, all data remains private and only on your phone
-Scan lead test strips, microbe, and arsenic test kit to get results in a format that’s easy to understand
-Get connected to local resources for additional testing and treatment
-Participate in a voluntary Citizen Science campaign to help improve water quality testing across the United States
-Water test history
-Complete instructions for test kits
Important Notice Regarding Test Kit Recommendations: This app is meant for use only with the Lamotte Lead Testing strip and the Aquagenx Compartment Bag Test. These tests are not available for individual purchase from the manufacturer. However, we are able to send users individual test kits thanks to our partnerships with the manufacturers.
Developed through a partnership between researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and CrossComm, Inc.