Well Aware
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 71 keywords for Well Aware in Google Play
Well Aware tracks 71 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 71 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.5, difficulty 49.6.
Test your water for metals and bacteria at home!
Tracked keywords
71
0 ranked • 71 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.5
Top keyword: tests
Avg difficulty
49.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 733
- 68.1
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,204
- 68.7
water
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,262
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 67.7
lead
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,303
Unranked opportunities
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 733
participate
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,204
water
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 1,262
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
lead
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.3 • Competitors: 1,303
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
available
Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
complete
Total apps: 73,791 • Major competitors: 8,679
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| easy | 64 | 100 | 62 | 89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 17,537 major competitor apps |
| connected | 70 | 100 | 56 | 74 22,704 competing apps Median installs: 25,700 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,181 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 54 | 71 15,144 competing apps Median installs: 20,930 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,085 major competitor apps |
| scan | 71 | 100 | 65 | 71 14,906 competing apps Median installs: 42,340 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,192 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 41,781 competing apps Median installs: 34,406 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,928 major competitor apps |
| format | 72 | 100 | 49 | 67 8,870 competing apps Median installs: 34,823 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 956 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 10,438 competing apps Median installs: 21,778 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 733 major competitor apps |
| purchase | 70 | 100 | 53 | 74 22,639 competing apps Median installs: 37,994 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,741 major competitor apps |
| complete | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 73,791 competing apps Median installs: 37,773 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,679 major competitor apps |
| citizen | 70 | 100 | 37 | 55 1,715 competing apps Median installs: 38,057 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
| tools | 69 | 100 | 62 | 76 29,774 competing apps Median installs: 35,852 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,872 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,617 major competitor apps |
| researchers | 69 | 100 | 31 | 48 646 competing apps Median installs: 17,784 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 35 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 46,984 competing apps Median installs: 36,014 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 5,304 major competitor apps |
| participate | 73 | 100 | 48 | 68 9,647 competing apps Median installs: 35,185 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,204 major competitor apps |
| aware | 72 | 100 | 41 | 62 4,398 competing apps Median installs: 31,492 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 426 major competitor apps |
| color | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 30,080 competing apps Median installs: 44,962 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,272 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 81 | 78 38,391 competing apps Median installs: 39,224 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 5,234 major competitor apps |
| notice | 71 | 100 | 54 | 62 4,072 competing apps Median installs: 38,766 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 474 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
| home | 68 | 100 | 61 | 80 51,240 competing apps Median installs: 34,808 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,129 major competitor apps |
App Description
Test your water for metals and bacteria at home!
This innovative at-home microbe, lead, and arsenic testing platform was developed for use with well water. Using our machine learning and color analysis algorithms, the app can read and explain results from a lead testing strip, microbe (E. coli), and arsenic test kit.
Features:
-No registration required
-By default, all data remains private and only on your phone
-Scan lead test strips, microbe, and arsenic test kit to get results in a format that’s easy to understand
-Get connected to local resources for additional testing and treatment
-Participate in a voluntary Citizen Science campaign to help improve water quality testing across the United States
-Water test history
-Complete instructions for test kits
Important Notice Regarding Test Kit Recommendations: This app is meant for use only with the Lamotte Lead Testing strip and the Aquagenx Compartment Bag Test. These tests are not available for individual purchase from the manufacturer. However, we are able to send users individual test kits thanks to our partnerships with the manufacturers.
Developed through a partnership between researchers at UNC Chapel Hill and CrossComm, Inc.
