UCL Icarus Accountancy
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 100 keywords for UCL Icarus Accountancy in Google Play
UCL Icarus Accountancy tracks 100 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 100 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 45.0.
Simulation for students studying Professional Accountancy
Tracked keywords
100
0 ranked • 100 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: decision
Avg difficulty
45.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.6
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 560
- 64.7
consistent
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 367
- 66.3
model
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 834
- 63.6
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 443
- 64.7
strategies
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 625
Unranked opportunities
decision
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 560
consistent
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 367
model
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 834
respond
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 443
strategies
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 625
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 375,249 • Major competitors: 23,968
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
access
Total apps: 333,757 • Major competitors: 12,342
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
designed
Total apps: 264,190 • Major competitors: 8,559
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
using
Total apps: 224,577 • Major competitors: 12,356
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
different
Total apps: 185,522 • Major competitors: 14,949
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 59 | 89 375,249 competing apps Median installs: 2,984 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 23,968 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 15,934 competing apps Median installs: 33,349 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,349 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 71,416 competing apps Median installs: 3,412 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,840 major competitor apps |
| competitive | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 24,068 competing apps Median installs: 1,319 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,195 major competitor apps |
| social media | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,807 competing apps Median installs: 3,088 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,232 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 28,102 competing apps Median installs: 1,374 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,114 major competitor apps |
| environment | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 31,277 competing apps Median installs: 2,169 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,086 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 16,441 competing apps Median installs: 1,512 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 918 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,430 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,133 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 84,520 competing apps Median installs: 1,464 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,201 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 264,190 competing apps Median installs: 798 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,559 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 42,395 competing apps Median installs: 1,808 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,808 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,577 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,356 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,287 competing apps Median installs: 2,580 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,427 major competitor apps |
| life | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 112,515 competing apps Median installs: 2,543 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,552 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 137,954 competing apps Median installs: 1,610 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,040 major competitor apps |
| company | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,520 competing apps Median installs: 1,158 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,378 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 131,189 competing apps Median installs: 2,542 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,751 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 129,545 competing apps Median installs: 981 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,532 major competitor apps |
| explore | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 126,932 competing apps Median installs: 1,904 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,955 major competitor apps |
| small | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 56,437 competing apps Median installs: 2,177 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,887 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 333,757 competing apps Median installs: 1,158 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 12,342 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 95,093 competing apps Median installs: 2,140 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,240 major competitor apps |
| student | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 32,726 competing apps Median installs: 840 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 431 major competitor apps |
| students | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 59,000 competing apps Median installs: 992 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 747 major competitor apps |
App Description
Simulation for students studying Professional Accountancy
Students will be able to use the model to explore different strategies, and carry out what-if analysis and scenario planning to test the robustness of their plans.
The simulation will be designed to include the following stages:
1. Research and analysis. Students will have access to past financial results of the simulation company and will be expected to research the real economic and competitive environment of the industry.
2. Teamworking. The simulation will include built-in social media tools to enable students in different locations to communicate and work as teams in managing their airports. A nominated Chief Executive will be responsible for co-ordinating plans and submitting the agreed decisions each period. Teams will be able to rotate the CEO and other roles.
3. Planning. Using the simulation, the students will be able to build a five-year business plan, including exploring and comparing different strategies and testing the robustness of their plans in different external scenarios.
4. Implementation. Team decisions will be processed through the “real world” model and teams will be able to compare their actual results against their plans and budgets and also benchmark their progress against other student teams. They also receive feedback about the market and data about changes in the competitive environment.
5. Reflection and further decision making. The student can adapt their plans, review their decisions and respond to new stimulae before submitting the second set of decisions.
6. Final report. Students may provide individual and/or team reports for tutors to provide feedback on.
