Urban Belonging
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 101 keywords for Urban Belonging in Google Play
Urban Belonging tracks 101 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 100 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.9, difficulty 44.6, best rank 5.
An app to study urban belonging across visual ethnography and digital methods
Tracked keywords
101
1 ranked • 100 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 5 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: thoughts
Avg difficulty
44.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
thoughts
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 355
- 64.4
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 281
- 66.0
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 357
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 62.9
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 381
Unranked opportunities
thoughts
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Competitors: 355
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 281
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 357
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 381
High competition keywords
information
Total apps: 267,617 • Major competitors: 7,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
take
Total apps: 189,267 • Major competitors: 10,633
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
different
Total apps: 187,624 • Major competitors: 13,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
data
Total apps: 181,410 • Major competitors: 6,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| belonging | 72 | 100 | 33 | 53 2,076 competing apps Median installs: 1,123 Avg rating: 1.8 | 5 | 5 | 49 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 74 | 100 | 45 | 64 11,030 competing apps Median installs: 508 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 281 major competitor apps |
| focus | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 59,847 competing apps Median installs: 762 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,094 competing apps Median installs: 1,207 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,822 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 124,534 competing apps Median installs: 778 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,271 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,617 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,567 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,776 competing apps Median installs: 1,982 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,602 major competitor apps |
| file | 72 | 100 | 60 | 71 29,017 competing apps Median installs: 4,380 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,188 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 103,569 competing apps Median installs: 2,224 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,286 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 53 | 74 41,428 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,301 major competitor apps |
| api | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 14,026 competing apps Median installs: 409 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 357 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 120,316 competing apps Median installs: 1,103 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,380 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,157 competing apps Median installs: 1,522 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| photos | 69 | 100 | 59 | 76 61,712 competing apps Median installs: 2,980 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,996 major competitor apps |
| picture | 71 | 100 | 54 | 72 35,511 competing apps Median installs: 4,638 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,413 major competitor apps |
| take | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 189,267 competing apps Median installs: 1,928 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 10,633 major competitor apps |
| group | 70 | 100 | 54 | 75 48,191 competing apps Median installs: 1,182 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,767 major competitor apps |
| code | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,262 competing apps Median installs: 1,505 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,022 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 113,683 competing apps Median installs: 1,032 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,277 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 88,486 competing apps Median installs: 2,925 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,726 major competitor apps |
| series | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 26,379 competing apps Median installs: 4,944 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,793 major competitor apps |
| city | 70 | 100 | 51 | 76 55,627 competing apps Median installs: 2,440 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,090 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,975 competing apps Median installs: 1,411 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,303 major competitor apps |
App Description
An app to study urban belonging across visual ethnography and digital methods
The app is published together with a set of scripts that turns its output into data visualizations in the form of e.g. network graphs and geographical maps. The methodological idea is that these visualizations can be used as elicitation devices in qualitative focus groups around the pictures taken. The patterns in these visualizations can also be used to select who to put together in such a focus group setting. An example could be to bring people together that have very different interpretations of an area or a series of photos to discuss this. Or to group people that use the same annotations. The possibilities are many.
The UB app was developed as part of the project ‘Urban Belonging’ that studied how members of different organizations in Copenhagen (e.g. minorities, handicapped and LGBTQ+) felt a sense of belonging to the city. The project was a collaboration between researchers from Aalborg University, GEHL architects, IT University of Copenhagen and Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. The project is built upon the app 'Snappthis' by Marije ten Brink and its redevelopment was funded by Ander Koed Madsen's project 'Doing Data Together', developed by Iain Kettles and designed by Marcos Cisneros. The code and the Figma file behind the app is open source. The app is handled through an API that you can get a key for by contacting akma@hum.aau.dk. More information about the urban belonging team, the thoughts behind the app and its possible research applications can be found at https://urbanbelonging.com/.
