MELD Calculator
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 94 keywords for MELD Calculator in Google Play
MELD Calculator tracks 94 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 94 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.5, difficulty 41.6.
Predicts 90-day mortality for liver disease and guides transplants.
Tracked keywords
94
0 ranked • 94 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.5
Top keyword: prioritize
Avg difficulty
41.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.3
prioritize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
- 60.6
accounting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 95
- 63.5
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 183
- 65.7
stage
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 794
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 348
Unranked opportunities
prioritize
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.9 • Competitors: 176
accounting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 95
patients
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 183
stage
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 794
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 348
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 368,929 • Major competitors: 21,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
features
Total apps: 253,887 • Major competitors: 13,784
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
without
Total apps: 211,639 • Major competitors: 10,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
based
Total apps: 152,098 • Major competitors: 5,361
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
day
Total apps: 124,197 • Major competitors: 5,901
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 368,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,547 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 21,444 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 56,934 competing apps Median installs: 3,726 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,126 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 82,250 competing apps Median installs: 1,765 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,984 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,909 competing apps Median installs: 1,039 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 840 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| prioritize | 74 | 100 | 38 | 61 7,037 competing apps Median installs: 568 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 32,012 competing apps Median installs: 2,136 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,289 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 42,475 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,898 major competitor apps |
| accounting | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 6,428 competing apps Median installs: 505 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 95 major competitor apps |
| patients | 74 | 100 | 39 | 63 9,687 competing apps Median installs: 670 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 183 major competitor apps |
| stage | 74 | 100 | 44 | 66 13,395 competing apps Median installs: 2,339 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 794 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,635 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,467 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 211,639 competing apps Median installs: 2,785 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,341 major competitor apps |
| exact | 73 | 100 | 50 | 66 14,813 competing apps Median installs: 1,528 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 619 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,523 competing apps Median installs: 1,468 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
| includes | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 66,409 competing apps Median installs: 2,083 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,546 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 16,009 competing apps Median installs: 1,306 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 609 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 52 | 70 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 983 major competitor apps |
| features | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 253,887 competing apps Median installs: 2,163 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 13,784 major competitor apps |
| detailed | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 102,271 competing apps Median installs: 1,042 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,775 major competitor apps |
| greatest | 74 | 100 | 43 | 63 9,116 competing apps Median installs: 4,038 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 592 major competitor apps |
| enhances | 74 | 100 | 51 | 64 10,865 competing apps Median installs: 603 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| ensure | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 70,927 competing apps Median installs: 867 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 2,328 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 152,098 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,361 major competitor apps |
| day | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 124,197 competing apps Median installs: 1,780 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,901 major competitor apps |
App Description
Predicts 90-day mortality for liver disease and guides transplants.
Key Features of MELD 3.0:
New Variables: MELD 3.0 includes additional variables compared to MELD-Na, which primarily used bilirubin, INR, creatinine, sodium, and the need for dialysis.
Albumin: A new addition to reflect the nutritional and inflammatory status of patients.
Sex: Recognizes disparities in outcomes based on biological sex.
Better Predictive Accuracy: The updated formula enhances prediction accuracy for both men and women, addressing previously noted biases (e.g., under-prioritization of women).
Improved Prioritization: The new scoring system aims to ensure fairer organ allocation by better stratifying patients based on true medical urgency.
Application in Transplant Decisions: MELD 3.0 is integrated into organ allocation systems in the United States and other countries, replacing MELD-Na as of January 2023.
Why It Matters:
Equity in Access: MELD 3.0 addresses sex-based disparities in liver transplantation by accounting for physiological differences in creatinine levels between men and women.
Enhanced Outcomes: By refining the risk stratification, MELD 3.0 improves the ability to identify those at the greatest risk of mortality without a transplant.
Formula:
The exact formula for MELD 3.0 has been updated to include the new variables, though the detailed calculation is typically performed by medical systems and software. It uses a logarithmic scale incorporating laboratory values for bilirubin, creatinine, INR, sodium, albumin, and adjustments for dialysis dependency and sex.
