Neurex
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 93 keywords for Neurex in Google Play
Neurex tracks 93 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 93 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 46.5.
Artificial neural network in your pocket
Tracked keywords
93
0 ranked • 93 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: often
Avg difficulty
46.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 755
- 68.3
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 830
- 69.6
immediately
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,118
- 70.9
traditional
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,414
- 62.4
error
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 372
Unranked opportunities
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755
input
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Competitors: 830
immediately
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Competitors: 1,118
traditional
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 1,414
error
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 372
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
create
Total apps: 93,845 • Major competitors: 13,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.1
available
Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 31,345 competing apps Median installs: 35,708 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,571 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,371 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 37,225 competing apps Median installs: 32,979 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,354 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 19,185 competing apps Median installs: 30,368 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,887 major competitor apps |
| immediately | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 11,872 competing apps Median installs: 32,552 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,118 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 14,045 competing apps Median installs: 28,059 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,414 major competitor apps |
| rate | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,148 competing apps Median installs: 33,875 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,128 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| error | 72 | 100 | 42 | 62 4,512 competing apps Median installs: 31,886 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 372 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| face | 70 | 100 | 55 | 75 24,650 competing apps Median installs: 46,450 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,493 major competitor apps |
| without | 65 | 100 | 63 | 86 113,596 competing apps Median installs: 37,274 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 12,654 major competitor apps |
| knowledge | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 23,013 competing apps Median installs: 22,252 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,315 major competitor apps |
| output | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,809 competing apps Median installs: 29,798 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| network | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 24,379 competing apps Median installs: 36,741 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,898 major competitor apps |
| back | 70 | 100 | 62 | 76 28,322 competing apps Median installs: 45,422 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,042 major competitor apps |
| displayed | 72 | 100 | 49 | 69 10,597 competing apps Median installs: 33,591 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 886 major competitor apps |
| pattern | 71 | 100 | 51 | 61 3,917 competing apps Median installs: 45,921 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 453 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,344 competing apps Median installs: 31,057 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,330 major competitor apps |
| decision | 72 | 100 | 42 | 62 4,410 competing apps Median installs: 35,836 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
| training | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 18,059 competing apps Median installs: 25,570 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,576 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,589 major competitor apps |
App Description
Artificial neural network in your pocket
1. Definition of the Neural Network Topology: This step involves defining the number of input and output facts, as well as determining the number of hidden layers.
2. Formulation of Input and Output Facts (Attributes): Each fact is linked to a neuron in the input or output layer. The range of values for each attribute is also defined.
3. Definition of the Training Set: Patterns are entered using truth values (e.g., 0-100%) or values from the range defined in the previous steps. In case that patterns represent time series it is possible to define number of patterns in sequence (time window) for the prediction of the output. Value 1 says that there is no time context and patterns are time independent.
4. Learning Phase of the Network: The weights of the connections (synapses) between neurons, the slopes of the sigmoid functions, and the thresholds of the neurons are computed using the Back Propagation (BP) method. Options are available to define parameters for this process, such as the learning rate and the number of learning cycles. These values form the expert system's memory or knowledge base. The learning process's results are displayed using the mean squared error, and the index of the worst pattern and its percentage error is also shown.
5. Consultation with the System: In this phase, the values of the input facts are defined, after which the values of the output facts are immediately deduced.
