Arabic Musnad Alphabet
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for Arabic Musnad Alphabet in Google Play
Arabic Musnad Alphabet tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 44.4.
Ancient Arabic Musnad Alphabet, comparison with 5 other Alphabets, & Writing Pad
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: transformation
Avg difficulty
44.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 60.3
transformation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 304
- 63.4
forms
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 284
- 66.2
articles
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 446
- 63.2
shapes
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 663
- 66.2
arabic
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 534
Unranked opportunities
transformation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 304
forms
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 284
articles
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 446
shapes
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 663
arabic
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 534
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
like
Total apps: 289,444 • Major competitors: 20,631
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
easily
Total apps: 213,778 • Major competitors: 8,249
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
without
Total apps: 211,639 • Major competitors: 10,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,776 competing apps Median installs: 1,982 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,602 major competitor apps |
| modern | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 78,102 competing apps Median installs: 979 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 3,243 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| write | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 35,852 competing apps Median installs: 4,027 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,016 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 88,486 competing apps Median installs: 2,925 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,726 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 59 | 78 77,552 competing apps Median installs: 3,276 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,281 major competitor apps |
| today | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 104,000 competing apps Median installs: 751 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,459 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 57 | 83 165,549 competing apps Median installs: 4,224 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 10,524 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 213,778 competing apps Median installs: 1,313 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 8,249 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 289,444 competing apps Median installs: 3,592 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 20,631 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 53 | 84 177,711 competing apps Median installs: 1,248 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,773 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 211,639 competing apps Median installs: 2,785 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,341 major competitor apps |
| books | 72 | 100 | 49 | 69 22,863 competing apps Median installs: 3,355 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 740 major competitor apps |
| transformation | 74 | 100 | 39 | 60 6,109 competing apps Median installs: 970 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| offering | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 50,747 competing apps Median installs: 831 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,892 major competitor apps |
| clear | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 92,568 competing apps Median installs: 1,482 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,567 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 17,925 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 807 major competitor apps |
| possible | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 50,116 competing apps Median installs: 2,016 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,197 major competitor apps |
| forms | 74 | 100 | 41 | 63 9,553 competing apps Median installs: 1,448 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 284 major competitor apps |
| articles | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 14,257 competing apps Median installs: 2,584 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 446 major competitor apps |
| long | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 64,848 competing apps Median installs: 2,084 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,515 major competitor apps |
| global | 70 | 100 | 53 | 74 46,174 competing apps Median installs: 2,443 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,929 major competitor apps |
| arab | 73 | 100 | 37 | 59 4,882 competing apps Median installs: 4,760 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
App Description
Ancient Arabic Musnad Alphabet, comparison with 5 other Alphabets, & Writing Pad
The earliest inscriptions of clear matured forms for Musnad scripts is from the time period, around the 9th to10th centuries BCE. Musnad and Phoenician had clear common roots, shapes and maturity period.
Many articles and books repeate the conclusions of western scholars of the nineteenth century, based on a handful of inscriptions, about a Arab Nabataean transformation to Arabic script. Few, like Mādūn, challenged this notion with serious and interesting analysis and reasoning. He speculated with illustrative details about a possible transformation of older Arabic Musnad shapes to modern ones, instead. Today there are many books and articles, disagreeing with the Aramaic Nabataean origin theory without offering a solid alternative theory.
For a long time, early Arabic was torn between its Musnad roots and the more mature Aramaic scripts around it. It may have had incorporated several Nabataean shapes, but it is hard to definitely claim it was a transformed Nabataean script based on a couple of inscriptions distantly resembling Arabic, especially since Aramaic Nabataean and Musnad have similar shape roots.