iQMsport Integriertes Qualität
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 120 keywords for iQMsport Integriertes Qualität in Google Play
iQMsport Integriertes Qualität tracks 120 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 120 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 44.3.
Control training and competition through subjective stress factors
Tracked keywords
120
0 ranked • 120 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: aimed
Avg difficulty
44.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.0
aimed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 157
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 63.3
sport
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 485
- 61.2
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 118
- 61.5
eating
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 353
Unranked opportunities
aimed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 157
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
sport
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 485
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 118
eating
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 353
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 282,188 • Major competitors: 14,387
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
information
Total apps: 267,617 • Major competitors: 7,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed
Total apps: 260,960 • Major competitors: 7,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
features
Total apps: 253,887 • Major competitors: 13,784
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.3
using
Total apps: 221,966 • Major competitors: 10,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sports | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 37,461 competing apps Median installs: 1,846 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,035 major competitor apps |
| exercise | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 21,267 competing apps Median installs: 1,035 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,016 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 56 | 76 56,934 competing apps Median installs: 3,726 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,126 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,138 competing apps Median installs: 1,239 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,617 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,567 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 53 | 79 85,638 competing apps Median installs: 1,274 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,959 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 260,960 competing apps Median installs: 723 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 7,547 major competitor apps |
| management | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 111,277 competing apps Median installs: 490 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,440 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 74 | 100 | 39 | 62 7,797 competing apps Median installs: 894 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 157 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 135,996 competing apps Median installs: 1,524 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,843 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| menu | 71 | 100 | 54 | 73 40,588 competing apps Median installs: 612 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,228 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 282,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,657 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 14,387 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,157 competing apps Median installs: 1,522 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 53 | 81 128,193 competing apps Median installs: 867 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,054 major competitor apps |
| success | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,347 competing apps Median installs: 1,325 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 907 major competitor apps |
| immediate | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 14,870 competing apps Median installs: 883 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 460 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 183,815 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,710 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,486 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,780 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 144,736 competing apps Median installs: 1,643 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,422 major competitor apps |
| researchers | 72 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,748 competing apps Median installs: 903 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| sport | 74 | 100 | 44 | 63 9,411 competing apps Median installs: 1,623 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 485 major competitor apps |
| improve | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 99,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,635 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,467 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 89,363 competing apps Median installs: 1,463 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,413 major competitor apps |
App Description
Control training and competition through subjective stress factors
The training control is based on (sports) scientific findings of researchers from the Technical University of Darmstadt and the Goethe University Frankfurt am Main.
iQMsport serves to record training factors that are important for the training control of the athletes. These are:
• the current physical and mental strain,
• the current condition,
• the quality and satisfaction with the training,
• cohesion in the team as well
• important influencing factors such as state of rest, sleep, nutrition and occupational or private stress.
The athletes judge these training factors personally and individually. Sports science research shows that the individual assessment and consideration of the training factors improves the training and makes it more successful.
In addition, trainers can also give their own assessments of the training factors of the factors of stress, quality, satisfaction and team cohesion of the athletes and then compare these with the self-assessments of the athletes. Sports science research shows that similar assessments are favorable for the success of the training and clear differences should be discussed.
The individual training factors can be recorded before and / or after the training. When recording before training, the training can be adapted directly. When used after training, the effect of the training can be directly determined and interventions planned.
Overall, the ten training factors listed below can be collected. These can be assigned to the areas (a) individual effects of the training and (b) individual influencing factors on the training and the performance:
(A) Training effects
1 Exercise stress (after training): Physical (speed, bounce, tactics, strength and coordination) and mental stress factors after a training session.
2 Training quality: Assessment of the current training day in terms of personal performance and effort, coaching and the relationship between athlete and trainer.
3 Satisfaction: satisfaction with the training and training course.
4 Togetherness in the team: cohesion and mood with the immediate teammates as well as the team as a whole.
(B) Factors
1 preload (before training): current personal resilience.
2 Recovery: Short-term and long-term regeneration and recovery.
3 Sleep: Sleep duration and quality.
4 nutrition: eating and drinking quality and weight recording.
5 Work / study / school: current school, study and job-related burdens as well as the current satisfaction in the respective area.
6 Family / Relationship: Recent satisfaction with or exposure to family and relational issues.
Detailed information on using the individual features (such as "Team management", "Starting a survey" or "View evaluation") can be found in the menu of iQMsport under "Help for iQMsport" and on the Internet at: http://iqmsport.de /
Note: The current version of iQMsport has been discontinued. a. in projects in cooperation with the German Volleyball Association e. V. developed. Therefore, some training factors volleyball specific designed and the assignment of a team is currently formally only for the sport of volleyball possible. Other variants for other sports (groups) are currently being developed.
