Herbicide Injury ID

Developer: University of Missouri

Category: Books & Reference

Add App to Comparison

66 installs

Ratings not yet available

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 50 keywords for Herbicide Injury ID in Google Play

Developer: University of Missouri Category: books_and_reference

Herbicide Injury ID tracks 50 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 50 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 44.2.

Need help diagnosing herbicide injury? Let Mizzou Weed Science assist.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 50 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.9

Top keyword: university

Avg difficulty

44.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 180
66.1
descriptions

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 128
61.7
scroll

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 429
61.8
trade

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 877
65.8
plant

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 321
60.4

Unranked opportunities

university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 180
descriptions

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Competitors: 128
scroll

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Competitors: 429
trade

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 877
plant

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 321

High competition keywords

find

Total apps: 308,601 • Major competitors: 17,763

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.4
help

Total apps: 283,445 • Major competitors: 15,667

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
many

Total apps: 165,071 • Major competitors: 11,682

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
users

Total apps: 135,633 • Major competitors: 5,427

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
search

Total apps: 131,916 • Major competitors: 6,891

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
action	71	100	55	73 39,159 competing apps Median installs: 5,732 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	3,929 major competitor apps
users	67	100	53	82 135,633 competing apps Median installs: 1,417 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	5,427 major competitor apps
active	71	100	48	72 32,853 competing apps Median installs: 1,777 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1,508 major competitor apps
interest	72	100	50	71 27,681 competing apps Median installs: 2,515 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,586 major competitor apps
used	68	100	54	81 115,833 competing apps Median installs: 3,149 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,092 major competitor apps
list	69	100	52	78 82,864 competing apps Median installs: 2,554 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	3,582 major competitor apps
find	65	100	58	87 308,601 competing apps Median installs: 2,783 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	17,763 major competitor apps
option	70	100	49	74 47,532 competing apps Median installs: 3,038 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,533 major competitor apps
key	68	100	52	81 122,334 competing apps Median installs: 1,375 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,893 major competitor apps
help	65	100	58	87 283,445 competing apps Median installs: 2,020 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	15,667 major competitor apps
university	74	100	41	66 14,230 competing apps Median installs: 1,726 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	180 major competitor apps
photos	70	100	57	76 61,451 competing apps Median installs: 4,001 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,440 major competitor apps
search	67	100	58	82 131,916 competing apps Median installs: 3,369 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	6,891 major competitor apps
group	70	100	53	75 48,423 competing apps Median installs: 1,401 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,899 major competitor apps
series	72	100	48	70 26,494 competing apps Median installs: 6,062 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,964 major competitor apps
many	67	100	56	83 165,071 competing apps Median installs: 5,360 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	11,682 major competitor apps
type	70	100	52	75 49,668 competing apps Median installs: 3,941 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,861 major competitor apps
enter	70	100	48	75 51,742 competing apps Median installs: 2,728 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,684 major competitor apps
detailed	68	100	50	80 103,009 competing apps Median installs: 1,187 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,084 major competitor apps
description	73	100	42	66 14,606 competing apps Median installs: 1,392 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	492 major competitor apps
descriptions	74	100	38	62 7,507 competing apps Median installs: 654 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	128 major competitor apps
scroll	74	100	46	62 7,616 competing apps Median installs: 1,996 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	429 major competitor apps
name	71	100	50	74 41,493 competing apps Median installs: 3,647 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,118 major competitor apps
trade	74	100	43	66 13,667 competing apps Median installs: 3,516 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	877 major competitor apps
plant	74	100	42	60 6,223 competing apps Median installs: 2,139 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	321 major competitor apps

App Description

Need help diagnosing herbicide injury? Let Mizzou Weed Science assist.

The University of Missouri Herbicide Injury ID app assists users in diagnosing herbicide injury. Search by visible plant symptoms, herbicide trade names, active ingredients, or herbicide site-of-action numbers. You also have the option to send photos to an expert.

DIAGNOSE PLANT SYMPTOMS: Key out the type of herbicide injury by answering a series of questions pertaining to the symptoms. On the results page, you will find photographs and descriptions of injury, which are organized by herbicide sites-of-action.

SEARCH BY HERBICIDE: Enter the trade name or active ingredient of the herbicide-of-interest or scroll through a list of herbicides. On the results page, you will find photographs and descriptions of injury, which are organized by herbicide sites of action.

VIEW SITES-OF-ACTION: Find the list of herbicide sites-of-action commonly used in agriculture. The list is arranged by group numbers, which are found on the front of many herbicide labels.

EMAIL AN EXPERT: Send photographs and detailed description of the observed herbicide injury to University of Missouri Weed Science Extension.