Herbicide Injury ID

Developer: University of Missouri

Category: Books & Reference

66 installs

ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 50 keywords for Herbicide Injury ID in Google Play

Developer: University of Missouri Category: books_and_reference

Herbicide Injury ID tracks 50 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 50 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 48.4.

Need help diagnosing herbicide injury? Let Mizzou Weed Science assist.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 50 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.7

Top keyword: organized

Avg difficulty

48.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

organized

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 763
68.5
id

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,271
67.6
active

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,388
70.5
interest

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,436
70.0
university

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 164
64.4

Unranked opportunities

organized

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 763
id

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 1,271
active

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.6 • Competitors: 1,388
interest

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Competitors: 1,436
university

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 164

High competition keywords

find

Total apps: 143,808 • Major competitors: 16,874

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.1
help

Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
many

Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
search

Total apps: 64,261 • Major competitors: 6,565

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 67.4
used

Total apps: 61,233 • Major competitors: 5,711

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
action	71	100	64	73 19,490 competing apps Median installs: 64,156 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,588 major competitor apps
users	67	100	60	82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,026 major competitor apps
active	72	100	52	70 13,334 competing apps Median installs: 30,112 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,388 major competitor apps
interest	72	100	57	70 12,516 competing apps Median installs: 40,690 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,436 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
list	69	100	57	78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,448 major competitor apps
find	65	100	65	88 143,808 competing apps Median installs: 36,002 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	16,874 major competitor apps
option	70	100	53	75 23,307 competing apps Median installs: 32,883 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,446 major competitor apps
key	68	100	57	79 40,681 competing apps Median installs: 35,653 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,828 major competitor apps
help	65	100	66	87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,840 major competitor apps
university	72	100	41	64 5,845 competing apps Median installs: 14,036 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	164 major competitor apps
photos	69	100	68	77 34,126 competing apps Median installs: 44,996 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,901 major competitor apps
search	67	100	67	82 64,261 competing apps Median installs: 33,401 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,565 major competitor apps
group	71	100	63	73 19,138 competing apps Median installs: 24,928 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,759 major competitor apps
series	72	100	53	71 14,526 competing apps Median installs: 43,250 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,895 major competitor apps
many	66	100	62	85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	12,574 major competitor apps
type	70	100	58	75 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 37,985 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,782 major competitor apps
enter	70	100	53	75 26,195 competing apps Median installs: 35,455 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,973 major competitor apps
detailed	69	100	52	78 37,199 competing apps Median installs: 28,491 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,729 major competitor apps
description	72	100	44	65 5,960 competing apps Median installs: 28,792 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	474 major competitor apps
descriptions	71	100	38	58 2,332 competing apps Median installs: 20,064 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	146 major competitor apps
scroll	71	100	56	60 3,217 competing apps Median installs: 38,583 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	388 major competitor apps
name	70	100	56	74 22,543 competing apps Median installs: 35,643 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,325 major competitor apps
trade	72	100	46	65 6,626 competing apps Median installs: 36,344 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	799 major competitor apps
plant	71	100	47	59 2,663 competing apps Median installs: 32,679 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	302 major competitor apps

App Description

Need help diagnosing herbicide injury? Let Mizzou Weed Science assist.

The University of Missouri Herbicide Injury ID app assists users in diagnosing herbicide injury. Search by visible plant symptoms, herbicide trade names, active ingredients, or herbicide site-of-action numbers. You also have the option to send photos to an expert.

DIAGNOSE PLANT SYMPTOMS: Key out the type of herbicide injury by answering a series of questions pertaining to the symptoms. On the results page, you will find photographs and descriptions of injury, which are organized by herbicide sites-of-action.

SEARCH BY HERBICIDE: Enter the trade name or active ingredient of the herbicide-of-interest or scroll through a list of herbicides. On the results page, you will find photographs and descriptions of injury, which are organized by herbicide sites of action.

VIEW SITES-OF-ACTION: Find the list of herbicide sites-of-action commonly used in agriculture. The list is arranged by group numbers, which are found on the front of many herbicide labels.

EMAIL AN EXPERT: Send photographs and detailed description of the observed herbicide injury to University of Missouri Weed Science Extension.