VR PlayWorlds

Developer: Monash University

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

84 installs

Ratings not yet available

1.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 48 keywords for VR PlayWorlds in Google Play

Developer: Monash University Category: education

VR PlayWorlds tracks 48 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 48 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 42.4.

Gives families an immersive experience of a Conceptual PlayWorld through VR.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 48 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: collaboration

Avg difficulty

42.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

collaboration

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 293
64.4
pop

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,238
66.2
perspective

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 357
59.3
showing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 555
64.2
tutorial

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 305
59.5

Unranked opportunities

collaboration

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 293
pop

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 1,238
perspective

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 357
showing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.3 • Competitors: 555
tutorial

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 305

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 383,308 • Major competitors: 17,750

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
download

Total apps: 338,298 • Major competitors: 17,476

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
experience

Total apps: 292,994 • Major competitors: 16,988

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
choose

Total apps: 194,897 • Major competitors: 13,496

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
complete

Total apps: 170,503 • Major competitors: 9,557

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
download	65	100	56	88 338,298 competing apps Median installs: 2,104 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	17,476 major competitor apps
collaboration	74	100	44	64 11,066 competing apps Median installs: 591 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	293 major competitor apps
users	67	100	53	82 135,724 competing apps Median installs: 1,421 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	5,445 major competitor apps
experience	65	100	57	87 292,994 competing apps Median installs: 1,710 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	16,988 major competitor apps
choose	66	100	55	84 194,897 competing apps Median installs: 2,929 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	13,496 major competitor apps
time	64	100	58	89 383,308 competing apps Median installs: 1,497 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	17,750 major competitor apps
complete	67	100	53	83 170,503 competing apps Median installs: 2,480 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	9,557 major competitor apps
immersive	71	100	54	72 32,771 competing apps Median installs: 5,086 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	2,763 major competitor apps
education	71	100	44	72 32,440 competing apps Median installs: 1,050 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	725 major competitor apps
smartphone	71	100	47	74 41,393 competing apps Median installs: 2,747 Avg rating: 3.8	—	—	1,880 major competitor apps
faculty	73	100	34	57 3,556 competing apps Median installs: 548 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	27 major competitor apps
based	67	100	55	82 151,581 competing apps Median installs: 1,470 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,856 major competitor apps
research	73	100	47	67 16,483 competing apps Median installs: 1,750 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	608 major competitor apps
pop	74	100	48	66 14,372 competing apps Median installs: 3,833 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,238 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	46	75 51,494 competing apps Median installs: 1,360 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,367 major competitor apps
model	73	100	45	66 14,610 competing apps Median installs: 3,776 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	842 major competitor apps
creating	70	100	52	74 42,999 competing apps Median installs: 2,280 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,686 major competitor apps
interactive	69	100	49	78 76,821 competing apps Median installs: 1,078 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	3,011 major competitor apps
family	69	100	55	78 78,070 competing apps Median installs: 2,633 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	4,665 major competitor apps
perspective	74	100	41	59 5,334 competing apps Median installs: 2,058 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	357 major competitor apps
council	73	100	34	56 3,424 competing apps Median installs: 995 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	41 major competitor apps
first	68	100	51	80 105,585 competing apps Median installs: 3,140 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,397 major competitor apps
showing	74	100	45	64 10,730 competing apps Median installs: 2,794 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	555 major competitor apps
theory	73	100	36	59 4,791 competing apps Median installs: 2,768 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	126 major competitor apps
teaching	73	100	41	66 14,759 competing apps Median installs: 1,416 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	351 major competitor apps

App Description

Gives families an immersive experience of a Conceptual PlayWorld through VR.

Conceptual PlayWorld is an evidence-based model of intentional teaching developed by Laureate Professor Marilyn Fleer at Monash University. This VR app gives families an immersive experience of a Conceptual PlayWorld. For first time users there is a complete tutorial which covers both theory and practice showing 360 footage from a Conceptual PlayWorld in a family home. Each characteristic in creating a Conceptual PlayWorld is explained through interactive scenes with animations and pop ups. Users can choose to experience the Conceptual PlayWorld from the child’s perspective or the adult’s perspective. Download the app to your smartphone and use a set of cardboard goggles to experience the Conceptual PlayWorld.

Acknowledgements

This app has been developed by Laureate Professor Marilyn Fleer’s Conceptual PlayLab at Monash University’s Faculty of Education in collaboration with Abbey McClean and Jonathan Li from the Faculty of Engineering through funding from the Australian Research Council FL180100161.