VR PlayWorlds

Developer: Monash University

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 48 keywords for VR PlayWorlds in Google Play

Developer: Monash University Category: education

VR PlayWorlds tracks 48 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 48 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 43.2.

Gives families an immersive experience of a Conceptual PlayWorld through VR.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 48 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: collaboration

Avg difficulty

43.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

collaboration

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 281
64.4
pop

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,146
66.2
perspective

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 317
59.3
showing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 497
64.2
tutorial

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 269
59.5

Unranked opportunities

collaboration

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 281
pop

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Competitors: 1,146
perspective

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 317
showing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 497
tutorial

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 269

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
download

Total apps: 335,308 • Major competitors: 15,858

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
experience

Total apps: 291,024 • Major competitors: 15,362

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
choose

Total apps: 195,566 • Major competitors: 12,116

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
complete

Total apps: 169,116 • Major competitors: 8,785

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
download	65	100	57	88 335,308 competing apps Median installs: 1,667 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	15,858 major competitor apps
collaboration	74	100	45	64 11,030 competing apps Median installs: 508 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	281 major competitor apps
users	67	100	54	82 136,094 competing apps Median installs: 1,207 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	4,822 major competitor apps
experience	65	100	58	87 291,024 competing apps Median installs: 1,456 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	15,362 major competitor apps
choose	66	100	56	84 195,566 competing apps Median installs: 2,302 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	12,116 major competitor apps
time	64	100	58	89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	16,191 major competitor apps
complete	67	100	54	83 169,116 competing apps Median installs: 2,111 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	8,785 major competitor apps
immersive	71	100	57	72 32,504 competing apps Median installs: 5,030 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	2,509 major competitor apps
education	71	100	44	72 32,320 competing apps Median installs: 899 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	674 major competitor apps
smartphone	71	100	47	74 41,250 competing apps Median installs: 2,175 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,722 major competitor apps
faculty	73	100	34	57 3,540 competing apps Median installs: 481 Avg rating: 1.6	—	—	25 major competitor apps
based	67	100	56	83 152,098 competing apps Median installs: 1,244 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,361 major competitor apps
research	73	100	48	67 16,394 competing apps Median installs: 1,495 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	583 major competitor apps
pop	74	100	50	66 14,248 competing apps Median installs: 3,732 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	1,146 major competitor apps
developed	70	100	46	75 51,614 competing apps Median installs: 1,099 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	1,245 major competitor apps
model	73	100	46	66 14,543 competing apps Median installs: 2,620 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	777 major competitor apps
creating	70	100	54	74 43,144 competing apps Median installs: 1,962 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,390 major competitor apps
interactive	69	100	50	78 76,377 competing apps Median installs: 1,012 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	2,801 major competitor apps
family	69	100	57	78 77,756 competing apps Median installs: 2,041 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	4,313 major competitor apps
perspective	74	100	42	59 5,317 competing apps Median installs: 1,526 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	317 major competitor apps
council	73	100	34	56 3,415 competing apps Median installs: 802 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	38 major competitor apps
first	68	100	51	80 105,932 competing apps Median installs: 2,460 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	4,952 major competitor apps
showing	74	100	47	64 10,771 competing apps Median installs: 2,086 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	497 major competitor apps
theory	73	100	36	59 4,770 competing apps Median installs: 2,348 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	117 major competitor apps
teaching	73	100	41	66 14,714 competing apps Median installs: 1,156 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	326 major competitor apps

App Description

Gives families an immersive experience of a Conceptual PlayWorld through VR.

Conceptual PlayWorld is an evidence-based model of intentional teaching developed by Laureate Professor Marilyn Fleer at Monash University. This VR app gives families an immersive experience of a Conceptual PlayWorld. For first time users there is a complete tutorial which covers both theory and practice showing 360 footage from a Conceptual PlayWorld in a family home. Each characteristic in creating a Conceptual PlayWorld is explained through interactive scenes with animations and pop ups. Users can choose to experience the Conceptual PlayWorld from the child’s perspective or the adult’s perspective. Download the app to your smartphone and use a set of cardboard goggles to experience the Conceptual PlayWorld.

Acknowledgements

This app has been developed by Laureate Professor Marilyn Fleer’s Conceptual PlayLab at Monash University’s Faculty of Education in collaboration with Abbey McClean and Jonathan Li from the Faculty of Engineering through funding from the Australian Research Council FL180100161.