PCAC Score

Developer: University of Pittsburgh

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

14 installs

Ratings not yet available

1.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +1.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 29 keywords for PCAC Score in Google Play

Developer: University of Pittsburgh Category: medical

PCAC Score tracks 29 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 29 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.0, difficulty 40.8.

Calculates the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Categories Illness Severity Score

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 29 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.0

Top keyword: patients

Avg difficulty

40.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 195
63.4
calculates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 136
59.2
clinical

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 78
62.1
informational

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 208
61.4
recommendation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 213
56.1

Unranked opportunities

patients

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 195
calculates

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Competitors: 136
clinical

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 78
informational

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Competitors: 208
recommendation

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 213

High competition keywords

provides

Total apps: 165,188 • Major competitors: 5,559

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
provide

Total apps: 136,450 • Major competitors: 4,941

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
helps

Total apps: 121,000 • Major competitors: 5,000

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
tool

Total apps: 102,060 • Major competitors: 4,105

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2
local

Total apps: 85,762 • Major competitors: 3,217

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
medical	71	100	44	72 34,083 competing apps Median installs: 1,242 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	912 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	52	82 136,450 competing apps Median installs: 1,644 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,941 major competitor apps
note	71	100	48	72 32,068 competing apps Median installs: 4,205 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,692 major competitor apps
score	70	100	48	74 42,919 competing apps Median installs: 1,541 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,050 major competitor apps
patients	74	100	39	63 9,664 competing apps Median installs: 746 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	195 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	54	83 165,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,452 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,559 major competitor apps
tool	68	100	50	80 102,060 competing apps Median installs: 1,332 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	4,105 major competitor apps
calculate	72	100	44	70 24,868 competing apps Median installs: 1,476 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	776 major competitor apps
local	69	100	52	79 85,762 competing apps Median installs: 798 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	3,217 major competitor apps
recommendation	73	100	39	56 3,361 competing apps Median installs: 3,407 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	213 major competitor apps
calculates	74	100	36	59 5,241 competing apps Median installs: 1,530 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	136 major competitor apps
categories	71	100	46	71 30,155 competing apps Median installs: 2,422 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,399 major competitor apps
questions	69	100	51	77 68,547 competing apps Median installs: 2,281 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,579 major competitor apps
necessary	72	100	45	71 27,672 competing apps Median installs: 2,348 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,214 major competitor apps
helps	68	100	55	81 121,000 competing apps Median installs: 1,426 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,000 major competitor apps
terms	72	100	52	71 27,299 competing apps Median installs: 6,660 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,916 major competitor apps
clinical	74	100	38	62 7,924 competing apps Median installs: 822 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	78 major competitor apps
substitute	73	100	35	56 3,401 competing apps Median installs: 1,820 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	98 major competitor apps
severity	70	100	27	44 582 competing apps Median installs: 1,535 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	10 major competitor apps
informational	74	100	38	61 7,208 competing apps Median installs: 2,172 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	208 major competitor apps
informational purposes	73	100	33	55 2,844 competing apps Median installs: 2,413 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	60 major competitor apps
diagnosis	73	100	38	57 3,769 competing apps Median installs: 1,894 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	116 major competitor apps
categorize	73	100	40	55 2,840 competing apps Median installs: 854 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	117 major competitor apps
purposes	73	100	42	67 16,772 competing apps Median installs: 3,160 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	603 major competitor apps
illness	71	100	29	47 946 competing apps Median installs: 2,454 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	25 major competitor apps

App Description

Calculates the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Categories Illness Severity Score

Tool to calculate the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Categories Illness Severity Score, which helps categorize post-cardiac arrest patients in terms of illness severity. This tool provides the questions necessary to calculate the score.

See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580975/ for more information.

Please note that this tool is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for local protocol, guidelines, or clinical judgement. It does not provide diagnosis or recommendation for medical treatment.