Campos Electromagnéticos (CEM)
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 67 keywords for Campos Electromagnéticos (CEM) in Google Play
Campos Electromagnéticos (CEM) tracks 67 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 67 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.7, difficulty 40.9.
Electromagnetic fields (EMF): Previous identification
Tracked keywords
67
0 ranked • 67 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.7
Top keyword: assessment
Avg difficulty
40.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 61.2
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 119
- 59.5
said
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 167
- 63.8
limits
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 720
- 59.9
royal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 486
- 60.4
workers
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 174
Unranked opportunities
assessment
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.4 • Competitors: 119
said
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.8 • Competitors: 167
limits
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.3 • Competitors: 720
royal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 486
workers
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 174
High competition keywords
information
Total apps: 267,610 • Major competitors: 7,569
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
based
Total apps: 152,123 • Major competitors: 5,367
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
user
Total apps: 144,493 • Major competitors: 5,148
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
making
Total apps: 124,590 • Major competitors: 6,002
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
may
Total apps: 88,289 • Major competitors: 4,569
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| health | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,677 competing apps Median installs: 649 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,610 competing apps Median installs: 1,024 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,569 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,468 competing apps Median installs: 1,486 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,780 major competitor apps |
| specifically | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 27,090 competing apps Median installs: 733 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 542 major competitor apps |
| guide | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 71,708 competing apps Median installs: 1,279 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,014 major competitor apps |
| user | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 144,493 competing apps Median installs: 1,565 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,148 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,274 competing apps Median installs: 3,227 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,998 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,437 competing apps Median installs: 3,279 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,875 major competitor apps |
| assessment | 74 | 100 | 37 | 61 6,984 competing apps Median installs: 978 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 119 major competitor apps |
| regulation | 72 | 100 | 31 | 51 1,548 competing apps Median installs: 2,244 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 28,202 competing apps Median installs: 996 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 645 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 152,123 competing apps Median installs: 1,246 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,367 major competitor apps |
| result | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 19,438 competing apps Median installs: 1,740 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 716 major competitor apps |
| equipment | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 19,437 competing apps Median installs: 1,458 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 982 major competitor apps |
| recommendation | 73 | 100 | 40 | 56 3,338 competing apps Median installs: 2,618 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 199 major competitor apps |
| specific | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 66,677 competing apps Median installs: 1,139 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,356 major competitor apps |
| public | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 50,730 competing apps Median installs: 2,176 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,898 major competitor apps |
| comply | 73 | 100 | 34 | 55 2,986 competing apps Median installs: 2,324 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 99 major competitor apps |
| said | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 5,477 competing apps Median installs: 4,208 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 167 major competitor apps |
| limits | 74 | 100 | 48 | 64 10,096 competing apps Median installs: 3,549 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 720 major competitor apps |
| may | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 88,289 competing apps Median installs: 2,784 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 4,569 major competitor apps |
| exposed | 71 | 100 | 32 | 50 1,302 competing apps Median installs: 2,874 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| royal | 74 | 100 | 43 | 60 5,762 competing apps Median installs: 5,208 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 486 major competitor apps |
| effects | 72 | 100 | 50 | 71 28,935 competing apps Median installs: 8,951 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,710 major competitor apps |
| necessary | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 27,608 competing apps Median installs: 1,858 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,098 major competitor apps |
App Description
Electromagnetic fields (EMF): Previous identification
The application aims to guide the user on the need to carry out the specific risk assessment as indicated in Royal Decree 299/2016, of July 22, on the protection of the health and safety of workers against risks. related to exposure to electromagnetic fields.
As indicated in the aforementioned regulations, the evaluation must be carried out in positions where workers are or may be exposed to CEM as a result of their work.
When an electromagnetic field emitting equipment is intended for use by the general population, it must comply with European legislation, specifically Recommendation 1999/519 / EC regarding exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields, incorporated into our legislation in the Royal Decree 1066/2001. This regulation limits the intensity of the fields so that exposure to them does not cause adverse effects for the population, making the rates established for the general public more stringent than for workers. For this reason, in workplaces with equipment and facilities that comply with said regulations, it will not be necessary to carry out a specific CEM evaluation.
However, in other workplaces, there may be a risk of exposure to electromagnetic fields for which it will be necessary to carry out a specific EMC assessment.
The application is based on the information included in the Technical Guide for the evaluation and prevention of the risks derived from EMF exposure in the workplace.