Factor Filtro Ocular (FPFO)
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 89 keywords for Factor Filtro Ocular (FPFO) in Google Play
Factor Filtro Ocular (FPFO) tracks 89 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 89 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.6, difficulty 43.7.
Eye Filter Protection Factor (FPFO)
Tracked keywords
89
0 ranked • 89 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.6
Top keyword: corresponding
Avg difficulty
43.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.5
corresponding
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 330
- 65.4
limit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,194
- 65.8
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 571
- 65.7
filters
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,315
- 61.1
duration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 321
Unranked opportunities
corresponding
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 330
limit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 1,194
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 571
filters
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,315
duration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 321
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,388 • Major competitors: 16,211
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
us
Total apps: 189,120 • Major competitors: 8,499
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
based
Total apps: 152,123 • Major competitors: 5,367
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1
order
Total apps: 142,086 • Major competitors: 4,034
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
know
Total apps: 131,854 • Major competitors: 5,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| source | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 25,793 competing apps Median installs: 1,836 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 938 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 142,086 competing apps Median installs: 481 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,034 major competitor apps |
| range | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 90,344 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,154 major competitor apps |
| protect | 71 | 100 | 56 | 72 33,391 competing apps Median installs: 4,416 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,779 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 43,002 competing apps Median installs: 1,430 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,671 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,388 competing apps Median installs: 1,265 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,211 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 93,967 competing apps Median installs: 1,722 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,675 major competitor apps |
| series | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 26,382 competing apps Median installs: 4,952 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,795 major competitor apps |
| angle | 73 | 100 | 39 | 57 3,940 competing apps Median installs: 3,891 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 273 major competitor apps |
| apply | 70 | 100 | 52 | 74 44,083 competing apps Median installs: 4,464 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,987 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 56 | 81 122,002 competing apps Median installs: 1,547 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,895 major competitor apps |
| know | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 131,854 competing apps Median installs: 1,723 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,574 major competitor apps |
| following | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 65,169 competing apps Median installs: 2,830 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 3,090 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 58,274 competing apps Median installs: 3,227 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,998 major competitor apps |
| light | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 42,836 competing apps Median installs: 2,470 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,200 major competitor apps |
| calculate | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 24,725 competing apps Median installs: 1,194 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 699 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,437 competing apps Median installs: 3,279 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,875 major competitor apps |
| present | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 26,438 competing apps Median installs: 2,626 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 916 major competitor apps |
| future | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 55,939 competing apps Median installs: 1,162 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,136 major competitor apps |
| main | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 68,488 competing apps Median installs: 2,332 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,232 major competitor apps |
| allow | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 48,171 competing apps Median installs: 2,089 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,165 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 73 | 100 | 37 | 59 5,141 competing apps Median installs: 2,416 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 187 major competitor apps |
| select | 68 | 100 | 57 | 80 99,869 competing apps Median installs: 2,298 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,611 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 56 | 83 152,123 competing apps Median installs: 1,246 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,367 major competitor apps |
| accident | 72 | 100 | 39 | 55 2,714 competing apps Median installs: 5,177 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
App Description
Eye Filter Protection Factor (FPFO)
Sometimes we cannot select the protection filters taking into account the recommendations of harmonized standards because the sources are not typified.
In these cases, it is necessary to evaluate if the exposure limit values (ELV) are exceeded based on the wavelength range emitted by the source. Depending on the emission spectrum of the source, we will calculate a series of values that comparing them with the limit values will allow us to know the risk index.
When the risk index is greater than 1, it indicates that the ELV is exceeded and it is necessary to protect the worker with a protection filter that must be selected according to the filter protection factor (FPF) for each wavelength range where they are exceeded. the corresponding VLEs, in order to mitigate the ocular risk that is intended to be avoided (thermal risk, risk of blue light, etc.).
In order to apply the evaluation carried out by this application, verify that the following conditions exist:
- Pulsed sources with pulse duration less than or equal to 0.25 seconds.
- The exposure limit values are calculated considering an exposure time equal to the duration of a pulse.
- Subtended angles in the following range: 1.7 mrad - Verify the subtended angle applying the following relation: [(x + y / 2)] / r (where x and y are the dimensions of the source and r the distance to it).
- Measure the spectral radiant exposure H (λ) at the exposure distance (when working with high intensity pulsed light sources, a distance of 0.2 m is considered as the most unfavorable if an accident occurs).
In future reviews of this application it is planned to expand to other exposure conditions
