Factor Filtro Ocular (FPFO)

1.4K installs
Ratings not yet available
68 monthly active users
Revenue not available
Install Trends
Weekly +3.00
Declining
Monthly +12
Declining
Factor Filtro Ocular (FPFO) icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 89 keywords for Factor Filtro Ocular (FPFO) in Google Play

Developer: INSST Category: tools Rating: 4.6

Factor Filtro Ocular (FPFO) tracks 89 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 89 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.6, difficulty 43.7.

Eye Filter Protection Factor (FPFO)

Tracked keywords

89

0  ranked •  89  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.6

Top keyword: corresponding

Avg difficulty

43.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • corresponding

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 330

    62.5
  • limit

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,194

    65.4
  • measure

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 571

    65.8
  • filters

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,315

    65.7
  • duration

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 321

    61.1

Unranked opportunities

  • corresponding

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 330

  • limit

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 1,194

  • measure

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 571

  • filters

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,315

  • duration

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 321

High competition keywords

  • time

    Total apps: 384,388 • Major competitors: 16,211

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5

  • us

    Total apps: 189,120 • Major competitors: 8,499

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5

  • based

    Total apps: 152,123 • Major competitors: 5,367

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.1

  • order

    Total apps: 142,086 • Major competitors: 4,034

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0

  • know

    Total apps: 131,854 • Major competitors: 5,574

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
source721004870

25,793 competing apps

Median installs: 1,836

Avg rating: 2.0

938

major competitor apps

order671005282

142,086 competing apps

Median installs: 481

Avg rating: 1.8

4,034

major competitor apps

range681005179

90,344 competing apps

Median installs: 1,281

Avg rating: 1.9

4,154

major competitor apps

protect711005672

33,391 competing apps

Median installs: 4,416

Avg rating: 2.2

2,779

major competitor apps

working701005174

43,002 competing apps

Median installs: 1,430

Avg rating: 1.9

1,671

major competitor apps

time641005889

384,388 competing apps

Median installs: 1,265

Avg rating: 2.0

16,211

major competitor apps

account681005579

93,967 competing apps

Median installs: 1,722

Avg rating: 2.1

4,675

major competitor apps

series721005070

26,382 competing apps

Median installs: 4,952

Avg rating: 2.2

1,795

major competitor apps

angle731003957

3,940 competing apps

Median installs: 3,891

Avg rating: 2.1

273

major competitor apps

apply701005274

44,083 competing apps

Median installs: 4,464

Avg rating: 2.2

2,987

major competitor apps

work681005681

122,002 competing apps

Median installs: 1,547

Avg rating: 2.0

4,895

major competitor apps

know671005582

131,854 competing apps

Median installs: 1,723

Avg rating: 2.0

5,574

major competitor apps

following691005477

65,169 competing apps

Median installs: 2,830

Avg rating: 2.1

3,090

major competitor apps

must701004976

58,274 competing apps

Median installs: 3,227

Avg rating: 2.1

2,998

major competitor apps

light701005074

42,836 competing apps

Median installs: 2,470

Avg rating: 2.0

2,200

major competitor apps

calculate721004470

24,725 competing apps

Median installs: 1,194

Avg rating: 1.9

699

major competitor apps

according701004674

45,437 competing apps

Median installs: 3,279

Avg rating: 2.0

1,875

major competitor apps

present721004570

26,438 competing apps

Median installs: 2,626

Avg rating: 2.0

916

major competitor apps

future701004876

55,939 competing apps

Median installs: 1,162

Avg rating: 2.0

2,136

major competitor apps

main691005177

68,488 competing apps

Median installs: 2,332

Avg rating: 2.0

3,232

major competitor apps

allow701005075

48,171 competing apps

Median installs: 2,089

Avg rating: 2.0

2,165

major competitor apps

calculated731003759

5,141 competing apps

Median installs: 2,416

Avg rating: 2.0

187

major competitor apps

select681005780

99,869 competing apps

Median installs: 2,298

Avg rating: 2.1

5,611

major competitor apps

based671005683

152,123 competing apps

Median installs: 1,246

Avg rating: 1.9

5,367

major competitor apps

accident721003955

2,714 competing apps

Median installs: 5,177

Avg rating: 2.1

191

major competitor apps

89 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

Eye Filter Protection Factor (FPFO)

The human eye can be damaged at work by three main types of risks present in work activities: mechanical, chemical and radiation.

Sometimes we cannot select the protection filters taking into account the recommendations of harmonized standards because the sources are not typified.

In these cases, it is necessary to evaluate if the exposure limit values ​​(ELV) are exceeded based on the wavelength range emitted by the source. Depending on the emission spectrum of the source, we will calculate a series of values ​​that comparing them with the limit values ​​will allow us to know the risk index.

When the risk index is greater than 1, it indicates that the ELV is exceeded and it is necessary to protect the worker with a protection filter that must be selected according to the filter protection factor (FPF) for each wavelength range where they are exceeded. the corresponding VLEs, in order to mitigate the ocular risk that is intended to be avoided (thermal risk, risk of blue light, etc.).


In order to apply the evaluation carried out by this application, verify that the following conditions exist:

- Pulsed sources with pulse duration less than or equal to 0.25 seconds.
- The exposure limit values ​​are calculated considering an exposure time equal to the duration of a pulse.
- Subtended angles in the following range: 1.7 mrad - Verify the subtended angle applying the following relation: [(x + y / 2)] / r (where x and y are the dimensions of the source and r the distance to it).
- Measure the spectral radiant exposure H (λ) at the exposure distance (when working with high intensity pulsed light sources, a distance of 0.2 m is considered as the most unfavorable if an accident occurs).

In future reviews of this application it is planned to expand to other exposure conditions