Comunicación verbal método SIL

346 installs
Ratings not yet available
19 monthly active users
Revenue not available
Install Trends
Weekly +2.00
Steady
Monthly +7.00
Steady
Comunicación verbal método SIL icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 93 keywords for Comunicación verbal método SIL in Google Play

Developer: INSST Category: tools

Comunicación verbal método SIL tracks 93 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 92 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.2, difficulty 41.6, best rank 12.

The SIL method estimates verbal intelligibility in cases of direct communication

Tracked keywords

93

1  ranked •  92  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

0%

Best rank 12 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.2

Top keyword: summary

Avg difficulty

41.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • summary

    Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 259

    63.7
  • obtain

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 549

    65.8
  • pressure

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 530

    63.6
  • speaker

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —

    Competitors: 282

    61.8
  • speakers

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 206

    61.0

Unranked opportunities

  • summary

    Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Competitors: 259

  • obtain

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 549

  • pressure

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 530

  • speaker

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 282

  • speakers

    Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Competitors: 206

High competition keywords

  • time

    Total apps: 385,850 • Major competitors: 16,372

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7

  • mobile

    Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4

  • using

    Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2

  • without

    Total apps: 212,452 • Major competitors: 10,465

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5

  • whether

    Total apps: 193,364 • Major competitors: 6,940

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
verbal711003149

1,262 competing apps

Median installs: 2,246

Avg rating: 1.8

1212

38

major competitor apps

level681005580

108,633 competing apps

Median installs: 1,962

Avg rating: 2.0

6,418

major competitor apps

communication701004876

57,176 competing apps

Median installs: 614

Avg rating: 1.6

1,193

major competitor apps

whether661005484

193,364 competing apps

Median installs: 889

Avg rating: 1.8

6,940

major competitor apps

handle731004468

17,923 competing apps

Median installs: 1,285

Avg rating: 1.9

1,004

major competitor apps

language691005476

61,785 competing apps

Median installs: 2,244

Avg rating: 1.9

2,468

major competitor apps

simply691005078

84,171 competing apps

Median installs: 1,452

Avg rating: 2.0

3,387

major competitor apps

used681005681

116,547 competing apps

Median installs: 2,391

Avg rating: 1.9

4,709

major competitor apps

people681005580

103,201 competing apps

Median installs: 2,258

Avg rating: 2.0

5,279

major competitor apps

using661005885

222,760 competing apps

Median installs: 2,297

Avg rating: 2.0

11,093

major competitor apps

time641005989

385,850 competing apps

Median installs: 1,264

Avg rating: 1.9

16,372

major competitor apps

mobile651005687

280,152 competing apps

Median installs: 1,245

Avg rating: 1.9

10,258

major competitor apps

obtain741004266

13,451 competing apps

Median installs: 2,204

Avg rating: 1.8

549

major competitor apps

tables731004059

5,017 competing apps

Median installs: 2,642

Avg rating: 2.1

244

major competitor apps

provides671005583

166,176 competing apps

Median installs: 1,227

Avg rating: 1.8

5,004

major competitor apps

allows671005484

178,103 competing apps

Median installs: 1,251

Avg rating: 1.9

5,820

major competitor apps

without661005885

212,452 competing apps

Median installs: 2,784

Avg rating: 1.9

10,465

major competitor apps

case721004571

27,920 competing apps

Median installs: 1,732

Avg rating: 1.8

1,039

major competitor apps

enter701004975

52,091 competing apps

Median installs: 2,328

Avg rating: 1.9

2,472

major competitor apps

calculate721004470

24,575 competing apps

Median installs: 1,228

Avg rating: 1.8

695

major competitor apps

pressure741004364

9,844 competing apps

Median installs: 1,835

Avg rating: 2.0

530

major competitor apps

two701005076

58,077 competing apps

Median installs: 2,863

Avg rating: 2.0

3,008

major competitor apps

different661005884

187,171 competing apps

Median installs: 4,067

Avg rating: 2.1

13,720

major competitor apps

according701004674

45,560 competing apps

Median installs: 3,293

Avg rating: 1.9

1,890

major competitor apps

sound691005276

61,379 competing apps

Median installs: 5,297

Avg rating: 2.1

4,208

major competitor apps

93 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

The SIL method estimates verbal intelligibility in cases of direct communication

The SIL method simply evaluates verbal intelligibility in cases of direct communication in a noisy environment. It can be used for fixed or mobile workplaces, indoors or outdoors, as long as direct communication is involved.
The UNE EN ISO 9921-2004 standard provides in its annex E a description of this method, considered an objective evaluation method.
This application allows you to obtain two different results:
- Evaluate intelligibility in verbal communication, based on the value of the SIL parameter.
- Calculate maximum distance between speaker and listener to maintain satisfactorily intelligible communication, based on the tables set forth in NTP 794.
NTP 794, referring to the SIL method, proposes three summary tables (depending on whether the sender and receiver are native speakers and listeners without hearing problems, or if it is the case of non-native speakers and listeners, but who handle the language with ease. fluency, or if the people communicating have mild hearing disorders) that allow obtaining the maximum distance between the speaker and the listener at which a communication is considered to be satisfactorily intelligible, based on the previously calculated LSIL.
The SIL method considers environmental noise, the application allows you to enter this value in two ways:
-The measurement carried out with a sound level meter, integrating sound level meter or dosimeter, of the sound pressure levels in the octave bands (500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz), in the position of the listener.
-The A-weighted sound pressure level, measured using a “SLOW” response time at the listener's position.
Other values ​​that need to be entered are the speaker's vocal effort and the distance between speaker and listener. The speaker's vocal effort can be the verbal sound pressure level measured one meter in front of the mouth, or determined according to a vocal effort table.