Salvavidas Estadístico
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 155 keywords for Salvavidas Estadístico in Google Play
Salvavidas Estadístico tracks 155 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 155 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 43.7.
Determine the statistical test you need by answering three questions.
Tracked keywords
155
0 ranked • 155 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: obtain
Avg difficulty
43.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.9
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 605
- 62.6
bad
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 54.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 772
- 63.7
normal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 673
- 62.6
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 241
- 59.7
gap
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
Unranked opportunities
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 605
bad
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 54.6 • Competitors: 772
normal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 673
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 241
gap
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 138
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 390,894 • Major competitors: 18,018
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.8
find
Total apps: 303,063 • Major competitors: 17,570
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
information
Total apps: 264,552 • Major competitors: 8,149
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
every
Total apps: 262,529 • Major competitors: 14,625
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.0
best
Total apps: 250,560 • Major competitors: 18,393
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 57 | 86 250,560 competing apps Median installs: 4,200 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 18,393 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 68,552 competing apps Median installs: 767 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,950 major competitor apps |
| software | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 31,250 competing apps Median installs: 1,565 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,108 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 140,164 competing apps Median installs: 557 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,295 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 106,290 competing apps Median installs: 3,372 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 6,740 major competitor apps |
| whether | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 194,949 competing apps Median installs: 948 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,802 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 81,888 competing apps Median installs: 1,408 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,063 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 141,450 competing apps Median installs: 2,295 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 7,071 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 103,865 competing apps Median installs: 1,505 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,133 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 264,552 competing apps Median installs: 1,195 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,149 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,130 competing apps Median installs: 3,080 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,201 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 133,315 competing apps Median installs: 1,825 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,411 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 303,063 competing apps Median installs: 2,782 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 17,570 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 390,894 competing apps Median installs: 1,407 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,018 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 137,871 competing apps Median installs: 1,605 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,012 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,567 competing apps Median installs: 3,483 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,858 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 55,984 competing apps Median installs: 996 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,905 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 131,047 competing apps Median installs: 2,529 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,704 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,529 competing apps Median installs: 2,875 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 129,454 competing apps Median installs: 977 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,501 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 37,196 competing apps Median installs: 2,739 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,991 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 17,379 competing apps Median installs: 566 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 422 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 95,183 competing apps Median installs: 2,137 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,248 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 27,864 competing apps Median installs: 1,302 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,095 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,708 competing apps Median installs: 1,790 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,926 major competitor apps |
App Description
Determine the statistical test you need by answering three questions.
There is a very common difficulty among health professionals when analyzing the results obtained in a research procedure. The development of clinical activity and its preparation often makes it difficult to learn how to face methodological and statistical problems. At a teaching level, it is complex to develop the ability to perform mathematical logic analysis to face statistical problems, which requires time that is not compatible with clinical practice.
There are many manuals and books dedicated to this issue, as well as a great amount of mathematical software that allows the most complex operations to be carried out and high quantities of data to be handled. However, between the basic knowledge needed to analyze the data obtained in some experiments and the knowledge about advanced statistics and data handling, there is a gap that professionals often find insurmountable. Interacting in the world of information and interpreting it correctly is a basic process that every researcher must control in order to obtain correct conclusions that allow science to advance.
Thus, a method that facilitates the choice of the most appropriate statistical test for each situation is presented, allowing the researcherers to analyze their results without the need of having advanced mathematical or statistical training.
The objective of the physical device "Salvavidas Estadístico" and its app, is to provide a 3-step guide to carry out a bivariate analysis independently, applying the statistical concepts required in the different fields of science. Through the choice of the confrontation of two variables and the evaluation of their characteristics through 3 questions, the test that best suits each situation within a research study will be suggested, specifically in the analysis of results. Three questions are presented:
1: What kind of variables will be tested?
The first step consists of answering what type of confrontation is faced from two variables that can be quantitative or qualitative (dichotomous or polytomous). The options are:
- Quantitative vs. quantitative.
- Quantitative vs. qualitative dichotomous.
- Quantitative versus polytomical qualitative.
- Dichotomous qualitative versus dichotomous qualitative.
- Polythomous qualitative versus dichotomous qualitative or polythomous.
2: Is there a good fit to the normal distribution?
To analyze the normality of a quantitative variable, the Shapiro-Wilk test if n<30 or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test if n>30 should be used. Both the Shapiro-Wilk test (for <30 cases) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (for >30 cases) are interpreted in the same way. If the result is p>0.05 we can assume normality (parametric statistics) but if p<0.05 we will assume a bad fit with the normal distribution (non-parametric statistics). It will be necessary to answer Yes or No.
3: Are the variables paired?
Two variables are dependent, paired or matched only when they are directly related to each other (same individuals or cases at different times). Therefore, it will be necessary to evaluate whether the comparison to be established between the groups is paired or not. It will be necessary to answer Yes or No.
After answering these three questions, information will be given on the most appropriate test for the specific situation described.
Salvavidas Estadístico® is a registered trademark. 2020.
