Salvavidas Estadístico
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 155 keywords for Salvavidas Estadístico in Google Play
Salvavidas Estadístico tracks 155 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 155 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 46.9.
Determine the statistical test you need by answering three questions.
Tracked keywords
155
0 ranked • 155 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: needed
Avg difficulty
46.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 968
- 68.6
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 651
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 68.1
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 755
- 68.1
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
Unranked opportunities
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 968
specifically
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 651
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755
analysis
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
find
Total apps: 143,808 • Major competitors: 16,874
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.1
best
Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 18,001 major competitor apps |
| health | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| software | 72 | 100 | 55 | 70 13,182 competing apps Median installs: 24,654 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,054 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,188 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 72 | 81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,390 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 31,345 competing apps Median installs: 35,708 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,571 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,746 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 45,953 competing apps Median installs: 29,549 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,617 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 56,251 competing apps Median installs: 34,640 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,945 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 65 | 88 143,808 competing apps Median installs: 36,002 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,874 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 18,440 competing apps Median installs: 33,512 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,756 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 6,975 competing apps Median installs: 33,614 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 670 major competitor apps |
| directly | 68 | 100 | 58 | 80 50,750 competing apps Median installs: 28,866 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,021 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 18,891 competing apps Median installs: 33,950 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 72 | 100 | 41 | 65 5,979 competing apps Median installs: 23,560 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 461 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 41,781 competing apps Median installs: 34,406 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,928 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 57 | 69 10,591 competing apps Median installs: 28,338 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 980 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 24,302 competing apps Median installs: 26,107 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,820 major competitor apps |
App Description
Determine the statistical test you need by answering three questions.
There is a very common difficulty among health professionals when analyzing the results obtained in a research procedure. The development of clinical activity and its preparation often makes it difficult to learn how to face methodological and statistical problems. At a teaching level, it is complex to develop the ability to perform mathematical logic analysis to face statistical problems, which requires time that is not compatible with clinical practice.
There are many manuals and books dedicated to this issue, as well as a great amount of mathematical software that allows the most complex operations to be carried out and high quantities of data to be handled. However, between the basic knowledge needed to analyze the data obtained in some experiments and the knowledge about advanced statistics and data handling, there is a gap that professionals often find insurmountable. Interacting in the world of information and interpreting it correctly is a basic process that every researcher must control in order to obtain correct conclusions that allow science to advance.
Thus, a method that facilitates the choice of the most appropriate statistical test for each situation is presented, allowing the researcherers to analyze their results without the need of having advanced mathematical or statistical training.
The objective of the physical device "Salvavidas Estadístico" and its app, is to provide a 3-step guide to carry out a bivariate analysis independently, applying the statistical concepts required in the different fields of science. Through the choice of the confrontation of two variables and the evaluation of their characteristics through 3 questions, the test that best suits each situation within a research study will be suggested, specifically in the analysis of results. Three questions are presented:
1: What kind of variables will be tested?
The first step consists of answering what type of confrontation is faced from two variables that can be quantitative or qualitative (dichotomous or polytomous). The options are:
- Quantitative vs. quantitative.
- Quantitative vs. qualitative dichotomous.
- Quantitative versus polytomical qualitative.
- Dichotomous qualitative versus dichotomous qualitative.
- Polythomous qualitative versus dichotomous qualitative or polythomous.
2: Is there a good fit to the normal distribution?
To analyze the normality of a quantitative variable, the Shapiro-Wilk test if n<30 or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test if n>30 should be used. Both the Shapiro-Wilk test (for <30 cases) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (for >30 cases) are interpreted in the same way. If the result is p>0.05 we can assume normality (parametric statistics) but if p<0.05 we will assume a bad fit with the normal distribution (non-parametric statistics). It will be necessary to answer Yes or No.
3: Are the variables paired?
Two variables are dependent, paired or matched only when they are directly related to each other (same individuals or cases at different times). Therefore, it will be necessary to evaluate whether the comparison to be established between the groups is paired or not. It will be necessary to answer Yes or No.
After answering these three questions, information will be given on the most appropriate test for the specific situation described.
Salvavidas Estadístico® is a registered trademark. 2020.
