Salvavidas Estadístico
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 155 keywords for Salvavidas Estadístico in Google Play
Salvavidas Estadístico tracks 155 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 155 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 43.6.
Determine the statistical test you need by answering three questions.
Tracked keywords
155
0 ranked • 155 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: obtain
Avg difficulty
43.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.7
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 603
- 62.7
bad
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 54.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 779
- 63.8
normal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 679
- 62.6
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 244
- 59.9
gap
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 146
Unranked opportunities
obtain
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 603
bad
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 54.4 • Competitors: 779
normal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 679
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 244
gap
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.1 • Competitors: 146
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 382,984 • Major competitors: 17,744
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
find
Total apps: 309,296 • Major competitors: 17,801
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.4
information
Total apps: 268,932 • Major competitors: 8,237
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
simple
Total apps: 259,851 • Major competitors: 12,378
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
every
Total apps: 258,231 • Major competitors: 14,455
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 57 | 86 257,149 competing apps Median installs: 3,989 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 18,550 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 70,051 competing apps Median installs: 784 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,979 major competitor apps |
| software | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 31,622 competing apps Median installs: 1,588 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 1,139 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 142,695 competing apps Median installs: 564 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,315 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 108,924 competing apps Median installs: 3,363 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 6,840 major competitor apps |
| whether | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 191,815 competing apps Median installs: 1,004 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,691 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 84,969 competing apps Median installs: 1,483 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,185 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 144,720 competing apps Median installs: 2,306 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 7,159 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 102,398 competing apps Median installs: 1,539 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,040 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 268,932 competing apps Median installs: 1,211 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,237 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,812 competing apps Median installs: 3,171 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,098 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 137,313 competing apps Median installs: 1,856 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 7,574 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 309,296 competing apps Median installs: 2,806 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 17,801 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 382,984 competing apps Median installs: 1,508 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 17,744 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 136,436 competing apps Median installs: 1,656 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,956 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,688 competing apps Median installs: 3,466 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,900 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,024 competing apps Median installs: 1,006 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,937 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 129,040 competing apps Median installs: 2,599 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7,589 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 13,363 competing apps Median installs: 2,965 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 603 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 127,697 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,434 major competitor apps |
| among | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,826 competing apps Median installs: 2,807 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,948 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 17,092 competing apps Median installs: 594 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 403 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 97,994 competing apps Median installs: 2,188 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,378 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 28,846 competing apps Median installs: 1,313 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,132 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,822 competing apps Median installs: 1,823 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,965 major competitor apps |
App Description
Determine the statistical test you need by answering three questions.
There is a very common difficulty among health professionals when analyzing the results obtained in a research procedure. The development of clinical activity and its preparation often makes it difficult to learn how to face methodological and statistical problems. At a teaching level, it is complex to develop the ability to perform mathematical logic analysis to face statistical problems, which requires time that is not compatible with clinical practice.
There are many manuals and books dedicated to this issue, as well as a great amount of mathematical software that allows the most complex operations to be carried out and high quantities of data to be handled. However, between the basic knowledge needed to analyze the data obtained in some experiments and the knowledge about advanced statistics and data handling, there is a gap that professionals often find insurmountable. Interacting in the world of information and interpreting it correctly is a basic process that every researcher must control in order to obtain correct conclusions that allow science to advance.
Thus, a method that facilitates the choice of the most appropriate statistical test for each situation is presented, allowing the researcherers to analyze their results without the need of having advanced mathematical or statistical training.
The objective of the physical device "Salvavidas Estadístico" and its app, is to provide a 3-step guide to carry out a bivariate analysis independently, applying the statistical concepts required in the different fields of science. Through the choice of the confrontation of two variables and the evaluation of their characteristics through 3 questions, the test that best suits each situation within a research study will be suggested, specifically in the analysis of results. Three questions are presented:
1: What kind of variables will be tested?
The first step consists of answering what type of confrontation is faced from two variables that can be quantitative or qualitative (dichotomous or polytomous). The options are:
- Quantitative vs. quantitative.
- Quantitative vs. qualitative dichotomous.
- Quantitative versus polytomical qualitative.
- Dichotomous qualitative versus dichotomous qualitative.
- Polythomous qualitative versus dichotomous qualitative or polythomous.
2: Is there a good fit to the normal distribution?
To analyze the normality of a quantitative variable, the Shapiro-Wilk test if n<30 or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test if n>30 should be used. Both the Shapiro-Wilk test (for <30 cases) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (for >30 cases) are interpreted in the same way. If the result is p>0.05 we can assume normality (parametric statistics) but if p<0.05 we will assume a bad fit with the normal distribution (non-parametric statistics). It will be necessary to answer Yes or No.
3: Are the variables paired?
Two variables are dependent, paired or matched only when they are directly related to each other (same individuals or cases at different times). Therefore, it will be necessary to evaluate whether the comparison to be established between the groups is paired or not. It will be necessary to answer Yes or No.
After answering these three questions, information will be given on the most appropriate test for the specific situation described.
Salvavidas Estadístico® is a registered trademark. 2020.
