CHEST - GSIC
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 66 keywords for CHEST - GSIC in Google Play
CHEST - GSIC tracks 66 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 66 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.3, difficulty 50.8.
Discover local and world cultural heritage places in a different way
Tracked keywords
66
0 ranked • 66 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.3
Top keyword: choosing
Avg difficulty
50.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.9
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,133
- 68.1
places
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,096
- 70.0
interest
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,436
- 66.0
de
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 644
- 64.4
university
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 164
Unranked opportunities
choosing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 1,133
places
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Competitors: 1,096
interest
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Competitors: 1,436
de
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 644
university
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 164
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 143,808 • Major competitors: 16,874
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.1
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
many
Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 66 | 83 68,533 competing apps Median installs: 35,866 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,317 major competitor apps |
| choosing | 73 | 100 | 47 | 68 9,425 competing apps Median installs: 35,705 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,133 major competitor apps |
| images | 69 | 100 | 59 | 78 37,077 competing apps Median installs: 30,933 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,614 major competitor apps |
| place | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 37,575 competing apps Median installs: 32,284 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,364 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,746 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 45,953 competing apps Median installs: 29,549 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,617 major competitor apps |
| interest | 72 | 100 | 57 | 70 12,516 competing apps Median installs: 40,690 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,436 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| educational | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 22,073 competing apps Median installs: 26,231 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,042 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 61 | 85 89,339 competing apps Median installs: 36,402 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 10,854 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 65 | 88 143,808 competing apps Median installs: 36,002 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,874 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| de | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 7,241 competing apps Median installs: 22,978 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| university | 72 | 100 | 41 | 64 5,845 competing apps Median installs: 14,036 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
| discover | 68 | 100 | 63 | 81 52,912 competing apps Median installs: 37,326 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,947 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 63 | 73 19,138 competing apps Median installs: 24,928 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,759 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 68 | 80 47,754 competing apps Median installs: 40,524 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,815 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 65 | 79 40,134 competing apps Median installs: 37,748 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,404 major competitor apps |
| many | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,574 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,669 competing apps Median installs: 50,678 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,748 major competitor apps |
| cultural | 72 | 100 | 41 | 64 5,726 competing apps Median installs: 18,314 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 289 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,086 major competitor apps |
App Description
Discover local and world cultural heritage places in a different way
When you use CHEST, you will find learning tasks of different types (such as text questions, photo questions, choosing the right answer, etc.) designed by teachers in these places of cultural interest to help you learn about their details. How many can you do?
When you use CHEST, you will find learning tasks of different types (such as text questions, photo questions, selecting the correct answer, etc.) designed by teachers at these places of cultural interest to help you learn about the details of the place of interest. How many can you complete?
To show you descriptions and images globally (and in multiple languages!), CHEST uses open data sources such as OpenStreetMap, Wikidata and DBpedia. In addition, open regional data sources (such as those provided by the "Junta de Castilla y León") can be included to enrich this data and provide you with a higher level of detail.
CHEST is an application designed and developed within the GSIC-EMIC research group of the University of Valladolid. GSIC-EMIC is a group formed by engineers and educators with expertise in educational technology, pedagogical practice, Web of Data and educational data management. Specifically, this application is developed within the doctoral thesis of Pablo García-Zarza.