PIDman
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 103 keywords for PIDman in Google Play
PIDman tracks 103 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 103 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 49.9.
PID - Prague integrated transport + info on the location of buses and trams
Tracked keywords
103
0 ranked • 103 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: wait
Avg difficulty
49.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.3
wait
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,347
- 68.1
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 755
- 68.2
info
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 939
- 68.0
transport
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,414
- 66.3
seconds
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 962
Unranked opportunities
wait
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Competitors: 1,347
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755
info
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 939
transport
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Competitors: 1,414
seconds
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.0 • Competitors: 962
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
want
Total apps: 103,224 • Major competitors: 12,476
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
many
Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
even
Total apps: 88,180 • Major competitors: 12,732
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.3
whether
Total apps: 76,585 • Major competitors: 8,596
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 55 | 77 31,345 competing apps Median installs: 35,708 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,571 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 57 | 78 39,078 competing apps Median installs: 31,139 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,448 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 60 | 76 29,202 competing apps Median installs: 32,388 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,022 major competitor apps |
| option | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 23,307 competing apps Median installs: 32,883 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,446 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 67 | 82 64,261 competing apps Median installs: 33,401 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,565 major competitor apps |
| track | 67 | 100 | 57 | 81 58,055 competing apps Median installs: 25,840 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 5,673 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 72 | 100 | 48 | 66 7,582 competing apps Median installs: 40,910 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 962 major competitor apps |
| vehicle | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 14,148 competing apps Median installs: 33,850 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,672 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 63,400 competing apps Median installs: 25,686 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,690 major competitor apps |
| hour | 72 | 100 | 44 | 65 6,011 competing apps Median installs: 33,208 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 671 major competitor apps |
| many | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,574 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,669 competing apps Median installs: 50,678 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,748 major competitor apps |
| current | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 37,523 competing apps Median installs: 28,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,434 major competitor apps |
| wait | 73 | 100 | 49 | 68 9,960 competing apps Median installs: 45,318 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,347 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 20,163 competing apps Median installs: 33,595 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 37,985 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,782 major competitor apps |
| want | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 103,224 competing apps Median installs: 39,982 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,476 major competitor apps |
| meet | 70 | 100 | 65 | 75 24,878 competing apps Median installs: 46,672 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,573 major competitor apps |
| next | 68 | 100 | 61 | 79 41,624 competing apps Median installs: 36,556 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,986 major competitor apps |
| map | 71 | 100 | 55 | 74 20,503 competing apps Median installs: 41,142 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,443 major competitor apps |
App Description
PID - Prague integrated transport + info on the location of buses and trams
In our village, bus connections are often delayed, so it often happens that one comes to a stop and sees three stacked connections depart (due to various delays) and then waits half an hour for the next one (even if the interval between connections is less than 10 minutes).
This has not happened to me for the last three years thanks to the Mafo application, which is the predecessor of this application. The Mafo application displays the current location of the bus (displays a map with the location from mpvnet.cz) - it is a somewhat rough solution, but usable. The disadvantage of this application is that only one bus can be displayed and the timetables are only for buses and trams.
So PIDman was born. From the name it is clear that this will be a PID (Prague Integrated Transport).
Timetables are downloaded from the PID of open data https://pid.cz/o-systemu/opendata/ and data on the location of buses from the Golemio API. So far, Golemio only provides bus and tram locations.
So now I can display above the map all connections that meet the conditions of the defined route or set and at the same time I get data from the Golemio API. It is possible to display the selected connection above the mpvnet map, as the position in this view is usually more current (in the morning rush hour even more than a minute).
Sometimes it happens that the connection runs but does not transmit its position (there may be a fault) - from three years of experience, this occurs about once a month.
If there is no position data, the position according to the timetable is displayed.
It is not the purpose of the application to search for routes with transfers (there are many other options for this). The primary purpose is to track when my connection goes for one direct route. I may have the option to use multiple direct routes - then I can use a set that combines multiple routes.
Downloaded timetables should be valid for about 10 days - the application can be updated daily.
What else is worth mentioning:
- filtered display of stops above the map (by type of vehicle or by zone)
- display of own position with respect to stops
- display of all nearest departures from the stop
- display of connection details (both the list of stops and above the map)
- departure time of the metro to seconds (suitable for deciding whether to add to a step or slow down)
So why was this application created? Because I don't want to wait unnecessarily at the bus stop. And what about you?
