FlowTracker

Developer: The Association for

Category: Tools

1.2K installs

Ratings not yet available

+28 weekly installs

+28 monthly installs

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 128 keywords for FlowTracker in Google Play

Developer: The Association for Water and Rural Development Category: tools

FlowTracker tracks 128 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 128 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 46.8.

Flowtracker: Making water resources data accessible and understandable

Tracked keywords

128

0 ranked • 128 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: started

Avg difficulty

46.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

started

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,064
68.4
currently

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 877
68.3
water

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,262
68.7
depth

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 899
68.1
strategy

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 2,300
70.9

Unranked opportunities

started

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 1,064
currently

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 877
water

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 1,262
depth

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 899
strategy

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.6 • Competitors: 2,300

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
share

Total apps: 102,576 • Major competitors: 11,283

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.5
designed

Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
many

Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
strategy	72	100	53	71 14,192 competing apps Median installs: 55,073 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	2,300 major competitor apps
weather	72	100	67	69 11,564 competing apps Median installs: 46,184 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	1,474 major competitor apps
share	66	100	65	86 102,576 competing apps Median installs: 35,820 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	11,283 major competitor apps
focus	71	100	59	73 18,611 competing apps Median installs: 23,658 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,710 major competitor apps
version	69	100	61	77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,300 major competitor apps
support	67	100	60	83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	7,371 major competitor apps
emphasis	69	100	32	50 811 competing apps Median installs: 17,949 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	46 major competitor apps
particularly	71	100	37	57 2,113 competing apps Median installs: 23,500 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	133 major competitor apps
simply	69	100	53	78 38,369 competing apps Median installs: 33,095 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,197 major competitor apps
collection	68	100	54	80 49,948 competing apps Median installs: 28,272 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,345 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	57	85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	9,110 major competitor apps
management	69	100	52	77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,393 major competitor apps
include	71	100	52	72 16,253 competing apps Median installs: 32,717 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,542 major competitor apps
hope	71	100	46	71 15,172 competing apps Median installs: 25,738 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,067 major competitor apps
time	64	100	65	89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	19,592 major competitor apps
available	66	100	66	85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	9,952 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
dynamic	71	100	54	73 18,485 competing apps Median installs: 37,329 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,447 major competitor apps
hourly	71	100	45	58 2,386 competing apps Median installs: 63,778 Avg rating: 3.7	—	—	326 major competitor apps
related	70	100	51	75 24,302 competing apps Median installs: 26,107 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,820 major competitor apps
located	72	100	41	63 5,156 competing apps Median installs: 17,624 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	324 major competitor apps
many	66	100	62	85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	12,574 major competitor apps
quality	67	100	61	82 61,778 competing apps Median installs: 31,412 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,617 major competitor apps
good	68	100	54	79 44,246 competing apps Median installs: 35,774 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	4,689 major competitor apps
improve	68	100	56	80 46,984 competing apps Median installs: 36,014 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,304 major competitor apps

App Description

Flowtracker: Making water resources data accessible and understandable

FlowTracker is not affiliated with any government entity. It’s developed independently by AWARD (006-821-NPO) with water-sector partners.
FlowTracker provides water-resource analyses and visualizations for South African river systems including the Limpopo, Olifants, Inkomati and uMhlathuze.

Data sources (independent analyses from public datasets):
– SA Government monitoring: https://www.dws.gov.za/Hydrology/
– Catchment agencies: https://www.iucma.co.za
– Research networks: https://award.org.za
– GloFAS (Copernicus/EC): https://global-flood.emergency.copernicus.eu/
– ECMWF weather data: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts
– CHIRPS rainfall (UCSB): https://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data/chirps

Key features
– Current river flow conditions from 200+ monitoring stations
– Historical context for today’s water levels and rainfall
– Dam levels with trends
– Submit field observations with photo capture
– Updated several times per day

FlowTracker processes public hydrological and meteorological data to show current conditions in context, supporting water-resource decisions across agriculture, municipalities, research, and environmental monitoring.

Attribution: Analyses incorporate data from GloFAS (© Copernicus Emergency Management Service) and ECMWF under CC licenses, modified by AWARD. CHIRPS data courtesy of the Climate Hazards Center, UC Santa Barbara.

Support: flowtracker@award.org.za
Web: https://award.org.za

Note: Coverage varies by Water Management Area. Data providers are not responsible for interpretations or visualizations in this app; no provider or government entity endorses FlowTracker.