ECRIMO, écrire pour bien lire
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 150 keywords for ECRIMO, écrire pour bien lire in Google Play
ECRIMO, écrire pour bien lire tracks 150 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 150 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 44.2.
ECRIMO trains the writing and memorization of sound-letter relationships
Tracked keywords
150
0 ranked • 150 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: french
Avg difficulty
44.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.6
french
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 499
- 66.1
assistance
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 516
- 65.8
grade
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 572
- 61.3
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 341
- 64.3
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 447
Unranked opportunities
french
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 499
assistance
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 516
grade
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 572
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 341
accurately
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 447
High competition keywords
without
Total apps: 211,639 • Major competitors: 10,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
start
Total apps: 200,156 • Major competitors: 11,835
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.2
real
Total apps: 180,934 • Major competitors: 12,023
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
support
Total apps: 170,973 • Major competitors: 7,327
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
see
Total apps: 164,775 • Major competitors: 7,524
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| word | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 50,132 competing apps Median installs: 3,082 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,200 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 79,784 competing apps Median installs: 5,732 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 7,164 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 82,250 competing apps Median installs: 1,765 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,984 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 170,973 competing apps Median installs: 1,240 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,327 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 54 | 76 62,071 competing apps Median installs: 2,203 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,472 major competitor apps |
| words | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 46,609 competing apps Median installs: 3,537 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| active | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 32,577 competing apps Median installs: 1,482 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,393 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 124,534 competing apps Median installs: 778 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,271 major competitor apps |
| particularly | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,456 competing apps Median installs: 1,516 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 53 | 79 85,638 competing apps Median installs: 1,274 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,959 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,194 competing apps Median installs: 2,383 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 135,996 competing apps Median installs: 1,524 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,843 major competitor apps |
| beneficial | 73 | 100 | 35 | 56 3,305 competing apps Median installs: 1,465 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 108 major competitor apps |
| immediately | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,277 competing apps Median installs: 2,481 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 870 major competitor apps |
| traditional | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 36,002 competing apps Median installs: 1,324 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,409 major competitor apps |
| goal | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 43,021 competing apps Median installs: 1,124 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,781 major competitor apps |
| exercises | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 16,407 competing apps Median installs: 1,342 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 469 major competitor apps |
| write | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 35,852 competing apps Median installs: 4,027 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,016 major competitor apps |
| group | 70 | 100 | 54 | 75 48,191 competing apps Median installs: 1,182 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,767 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 96,985 competing apps Median installs: 1,974 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,882 major competitor apps |
| code | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,262 competing apps Median installs: 1,505 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,022 major competitor apps |
| student | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,130 competing apps Median installs: 746 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 403 major competitor apps |
| students | 70 | 100 | 46 | 76 58,530 competing apps Median installs: 874 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 679 major competitor apps |
| start | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 200,156 competing apps Median installs: 2,256 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 11,835 major competitor apps |
| assistance | 74 | 100 | 45 | 66 14,165 competing apps Median installs: 920 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 516 major competitor apps |
App Description
ECRIMO trains the writing and memorization of sound-letter relationships
Encoding exercises (writing under dictation) are very beneficial for learning written language, particularly for students with difficulties. Unfortunately, we know that beginning student readers (5-6 years old) get too little practice in coding.
The primary goal of ECRIMO is to train students to encode words they hear in writing, repeatedly, to improve their knowledge of the alphabetical code and thus support reading. Its second goal is to start memorizing the spelling of words and the particularities of the written French language (graphotactic frequencies).
Thanks to digital technology, each student works independently, at their own pace, receives feedback after each written word, assistance to better segment the dictated word and memorize phoneme-grapheme correspondences.
How does ECRIMO work?
The application can be played on a tablet or computer.
The child hears a syllable or a word and writes it by clicking on the appropriate letter labels. If the word is written well, the child immediately receives positive feedback. If it contains an error, the student is invited to try again. The correct letters remain in the answer cell and a syllabic segmentation of the word is audible, as well as visible in the answer box. If he fails again on the 2nd try, the correctly written word is immediately shown to him associated with its oral form, to give him the opportunity to see it spelled correctly and to compare it to his own answer.
ECRIMO has two progressions: one to start encoding at the start of CP and one to progress in writing from the middle of the CP year. There are 960 words per progression, or 1920 words to write during the entire year of CP!
The words to be written are adapted to the progression of learning in CP, with increasing difficulty based on the increase in the length of the word, the difficulty of the sound-letter correspondences to be used and the number of distractor letters offered.
A scientifically validated application
ECRIMO has been the subject of several experiments in real situations, in CP classes in Isère. In the main study, 311 students participated. For 10 weeks, one group used ECRIMO, an active control group carried out the same dictations but without application (words dictated by the teacher) and a passive control group was without training. The results suggest that offering ECRIMO in class during first grade helps the weakest students to progress in writing words, as much as intensive practice of traditional dictations could do. Another experiment (publication currently being written) confirms these initial results: ECRIMO, compared to a control application, significantly improves the abilities of CP children to write phonologically accurately and helps the weakest to memorize lexical spelling.
Link to the popular scientific publication: https://fondamentapps.com/wp-content/uploads/fondamentapps-synthese-ecrimo.pdf
Link to the scientific article: https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13354
To test ECRIMO, go here: https://fondamentapps.com/#contact
