AeroEngineS
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 48 keywords for AeroEngineS in Google Play
AeroEngineS tracks 48 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 47 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.9, difficulty 42.7, best rank 27.
Aircraft Engine Performance at Design Point
Tracked keywords
48
1 ranked • 47 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 27 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.9
Top keyword: pressure
Avg difficulty
42.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
pressure
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 586
- 63.7
combined
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 567
- 65.3
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 381
- 60.8
cycle
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 335
- 63.0
flight
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 689
Unranked opportunities
pressure
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 586
combined
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 567
calculation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 381
cycle
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 335
flight
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 689
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 221,317 • Major competitors: 12,105
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
based
Total apps: 151,581 • Major competitors: 5,856
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
design
Total apps: 100,131 • Major competitors: 4,915
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
power
Total apps: 67,856 • Major competitors: 4,145
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
performance
Total apps: 66,520 • Major competitors: 1,998
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| engine | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 15,866 competing apps Median installs: 6,751 Avg rating: 3.9 | 27 | 27 | 1,489 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 100,131 competing apps Median installs: 1,962 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,915 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 43,170 competing apps Median installs: 1,780 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,831 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 221,317 competing apps Median installs: 2,899 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 12,105 major competitor apps |
| international | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 36,923 competing apps Median installs: 2,055 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,998 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,563 competing apps Median installs: 428 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 346 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 67,856 competing apps Median installs: 2,282 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,145 major competitor apps |
| area | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 33,075 competing apps Median installs: 1,656 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,437 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 49,652 competing apps Median installs: 3,942 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,860 major competitor apps |
| performance | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 66,520 competing apps Median installs: 942 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,998 major competitor apps |
| map | 71 | 100 | 50 | 74 41,906 competing apps Median installs: 3,383 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 2,584 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 12,628 competing apps Median installs: 2,008 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 381 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 75 | 100 | 42 | 64 10,064 competing apps Median installs: 2,137 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 586 major competitor apps |
| automatic | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 40,978 competing apps Median installs: 2,385 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,136 major competitor apps |
| air | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 19,155 competing apps Median installs: 2,845 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,404 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 47 | 69 22,384 competing apps Median installs: 2,890 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,255 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 151,581 competing apps Median installs: 1,470 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,856 major competitor apps |
| cycle | 74 | 100 | 40 | 61 6,616 competing apps Median installs: 1,896 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 335 major competitor apps |
| component | 72 | 100 | 72 | 54 2,495 competing apps Median installs: 1,173 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 110 major competitor apps |
| flight | 74 | 100 | 43 | 63 9,117 competing apps Median installs: 2,943 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 689 major competitor apps |
| conditions | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 18,260 competing apps Median installs: 4,730 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,107 major competitor apps |
| point | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 35,411 competing apps Median installs: 1,899 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,703 major competitor apps |
| existing | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 21,300 competing apps Median installs: 2,012 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 822 major competitor apps |
| operating | 73 | 100 | 47 | 68 18,228 competing apps Median installs: 1,902 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 809 major competitor apps |
| prediction | 74 | 100 | 38 | 59 5,230 competing apps Median installs: 10,586 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 282 major competitor apps |
App Description
Aircraft Engine Performance at Design Point
- Subsonic/Supersonic 1-Spool Turbojet
- Subsonic 2-Spool Turbofan
- Subsonic 2-Spool Boosted Turbofan
- Subsonic 3-Spool Turbofan
- Analysis of the Thermodynamic Cycle
- Nozzle Area and Performance (Thrust, Power etc.) calculation
- Mass Flows (Core, Bypass, Fuel)
- Automatic calculation of ambient conditions based on the flight altitude using the International Standard Atmosphere model
- Automatic calculation of Cp, gama, R for each component based on temperature and Fuel to Air Ratio
- Automatic calculation of isentropic efficiency for each compressor and turbine based on polytropic efficiency and pressure ratio
Compressor Map Operating Point Prediction using
- Scaling Techniques on an existing HPC map
- Artificial Neural Networks to interpolate the existing map's data
Aircraft Emissions
- Emissions calculation for aircraft engines in LTO cycle and Cruise
- Type of turbofan engines used: 1. Subsonic 2-Spool, 2. Subsonic 3-Spool
Hybrid Precooled Rocket Engine at Design Point
- Analysis of the combined Thermodynamic Cycles with Air, Hydrogen & Helium as working fluids.