窗安無事 WIN SAFE

Developer: Buildings Department

Category: Productivity

7.5K installs

Ratings not yet available

+26 weekly installs

trend steady

+126 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 48 keywords for 窗安無事 WIN SAFE in Google Play

Developer: Buildings Department Category: productivity

窗安無事 WIN SAFE tracks 48 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 48 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 46.6.

“WIN SAFE” connecting property owners/QP/BD for MWIS in an efficient manner

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 48 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: cost

Avg difficulty

46.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

cost

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 980
68.7
property

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 963
67.8
owners

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 265
63.9
searching

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,222
69.2
building

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 2,097
71.2

Unranked opportunities

cost

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.7 • Competitors: 980
property

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 963
owners

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 265
searching

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 1,222
building

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 51.8 • Competitors: 2,097

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
available

Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
data

Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
collection

Total apps: 49,948 • Major competitors: 4,345

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
well

Total apps: 46,736 • Major competitors: 4,373

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
individual	71	100	54	71 15,144 competing apps Median installs: 20,930 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,085 major competitor apps
collection	68	100	54	80 49,948 competing apps Median installs: 28,272 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,345 major competitor apps
available	66	100	66	85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	9,952 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
efficient	71	100	54	72 16,594 competing apps Median installs: 15,694 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,185 major competitor apps
performance	70	100	50	74 20,995 competing apps Median installs: 19,402 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,705 major competitor apps
files	71	100	76	72 16,954 competing apps Median installs: 62,049 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	2,879 major competitor apps
win	70	100	58	74 21,943 competing apps Median installs: 77,417 Avg rating: 3.3	—	—	4,365 major competitor apps
data	67	100	65	83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,589 major competitor apps
owners	72	100	43	64 5,455 competing apps Median installs: 19,351 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	265 major competitor apps
voice	70	100	69	76 28,655 competing apps Median installs: 41,610 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,467 major competitor apps
cost	73	100	48	69 10,513 competing apps Median installs: 29,271 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	980 major competitor apps
person	71	100	53	71 14,832 competing apps Median installs: 39,365 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,820 major competitor apps
well	68	100	54	80 46,736 competing apps Median installs: 30,414 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,373 major competitor apps
property	73	100	45	68 9,341 competing apps Median installs: 36,968 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	963 major competitor apps
searching	72	100	49	69 11,155 competing apps Median installs: 35,352 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,222 major competitor apps
building	72	100	52	71 14,702 competing apps Median installs: 41,749 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,097 major competitor apps
rating	72	100	55	65 6,775 competing apps Median installs: 31,335 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	578 major competitor apps
qualified	71	100	37	58 2,565 competing apps Median installs: 19,037 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	140 major competitor apps
early	72	100	45	66 7,272 competing apps Median installs: 31,386 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	812 major competitor apps
connecting	72	100	61	67 8,308 competing apps Median installs: 29,308 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	891 major competitor apps
launched	71	100	42	59 2,900 competing apps Median installs: 31,413 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	249 major competitor apps
statistic	67	100	26	39 188 competing apps Median installs: 38,010 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	18 major competitor apps
enhancing	72	100	44	64 5,602 competing apps Median installs: 29,752 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	597 major competitor apps
enables	72	100	57	71 13,596 competing apps Median installs: 24,298 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,073 major competitor apps

App Description

“WIN SAFE” connecting property owners/QP/BD for MWIS in an efficient manner

To facilitate property owners to appoint a Qualified Person (QP) for Mandatory Windows Inspection Scheme (MWIS), Buildings Department (BD) launched this mobile application “WIN SAFE” connecting property owners/QP/BD for MWIS in an efficient manner, as a result, facilitating property owners’ early compliance of MWIS notices as well as enhancing building safety

Functions include: -
- Searching QPs that meets individual owner’s needs

- Rating by owners on the overall performance of the appointed QPs
- Chatroom available for owners and QPs, which enables photos, files and voice recording attachments
- Application for extension of time
- Handling of enquiries
- Collection of cost data from property owners and QPs for statistic and public’s reference