EPA's RSL/RML

Developer: US Environmental Protection

Category: Books & Reference

957 installs

9 ratings

+1 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 37 keywords for EPA's RSL/RML in Google Play

Developer: US Environmental Protection Agency Category: books_and_reference Rating: 3.89

EPA's RSL/RML tracks 37 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 37 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.3, difficulty 50.4.

US EPA Regional Screening Levels and Removal Management Levels

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 37 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.3

Top keyword: water

Avg difficulty

50.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

water

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,262
68.7
protection

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,237
67.5
physical

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,139
70.0
decision

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 470
62.3
site

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 689
67.1

Unranked opportunities

water

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.1 • Competitors: 1,262
protection

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 63.7 • Competitors: 1,237
physical

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Competitors: 1,139
decision

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 470
site

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.1 • Competitors: 689

High competition keywords

using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
us

Total apps: 96,924 • Major competitors: 10,444

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
see

Total apps: 78,341 • Major competitors: 9,101

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.4
please

Total apps: 75,311 • Major competitors: 7,632

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.3
support

Total apps: 68,575 • Major competitors: 7,371

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
support	67	100	60	83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	7,371 major competitor apps
individual	71	100	54	71 15,144 competing apps Median installs: 20,930 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,085 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
management	69	100	52	77 32,852 competing apps Median installs: 18,996 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,393 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
see	67	100	68	84 78,341 competing apps Median installs: 34,000 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	9,101 major competitor apps
please	67	100	58	83 75,311 competing apps Median installs: 36,602 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	7,632 major competitor apps
tap	69	100	65	78 36,460 competing apps Median installs: 43,645 Avg rating: 3.3	—	—	5,343 major competitor apps
physical	72	100	47	70 12,418 competing apps Median installs: 24,232 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,139 major competitor apps
latest	67	100	65	82 60,108 competing apps Median installs: 30,299 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,868 major competitor apps
decision	72	100	42	62 4,410 competing apps Median installs: 35,836 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	470 major competitor apps
calculated	71	100	38	59 2,717 competing apps Median installs: 29,096 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	233 major competitor apps
removal	70	100	42	55 1,570 competing apps Median installs: 46,765 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	229 major competitor apps
based	67	100	63	82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,592 major competitor apps
levels	69	100	57	78 35,256 competing apps Median installs: 55,572 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	5,718 major competitor apps
water	73	100	47	69 10,540 competing apps Median installs: 35,328 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,262 major competitor apps
drinking	70	100	37	54 1,377 competing apps Median installs: 34,988 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	139 major competitor apps
drinking water	68	100	29	43 324 competing apps Median installs: 20,634 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	25 major competitor apps
specific	70	100	56	76 26,226 competing apps Median installs: 27,691 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,394 major competitor apps
updated	69	100	54	77 32,012 competing apps Median installs: 28,552 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,956 major competitor apps
may	68	100	69	80 48,197 competing apps Median installs: 37,379 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	5,628 major competitor apps
site	72	100	46	67 8,500 competing apps Median installs: 25,324 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	689 major competitor apps
twice	70	100	43	54 1,453 competing apps Median installs: 26,843 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	120 major competitor apps
investigation	69	100	33	50 802 competing apps Median installs: 38,884 Avg rating: 3.6	—	—	61 major competitor apps
soil	69	100	35	47 584 competing apps Median installs: 24,392 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	46 major competitor apps

App Description

US EPA Regional Screening Levels and Removal Management Levels

The US Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) are chemical-specific concentrations for individual contaminants in air, drinking water and soil that, if exceeded, may warrant further investigation or site cleanup. The Regional Removal Management Levels (RMLs) are chemical-specific concentrations for individual contaminants in tap water and soil that may be used to support the decision for EPA to undertake a removal action. The RSLs and RMLs are risk-based levels, calculated using the latest toxicity values, default exposure assumptions and physical and chemical properties. They are updated twice a year. For more information, please see the RSL (https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls) and RML (https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-removal-management-levels-chemicals-rmls) websites.