ForestApp

Developer: avesysenderos.com

Category: Productivity

157 installs

ratings

+10 weekly installs

trend steady

+13 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 55 keywords for ForestApp in Google Play

Developer: avesysenderos.com Category: productivity

ForestApp tracks 55 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 55 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 44.0.

Application for calculating carbon in forestry properties in the State of Jalisco

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 55 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: stored

Avg difficulty

44.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,026
67.7
property

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 963
67.8
analysis

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 737
68.1
obtain

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 670
65.7
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,388
70.8

Unranked opportunities

stored

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,026
property

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 963
analysis

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 737
obtain

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.3 • Competitors: 670
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Competitors: 1,388

High competition keywords

using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile

Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
data

Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
used

Total apps: 61,233 • Major competitors: 5,711

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.3
makes

Total apps: 50,396 • Major competitors: 5,481

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	60	86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	10,537 major competitor apps
obtain	72	100	44	66 6,975 competing apps Median installs: 33,614 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	670 major competitor apps
area	72	100	54	71 13,871 competing apps Median installs: 28,178 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,388 major competitor apps
current	69	100	54	78 37,523 competing apps Median installs: 28,093 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,434 major competitor apps
satellite	71	100	42	58 2,646 competing apps Median installs: 45,810 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	361 major competitor apps
made	68	100	57	79 42,597 competing apps Median installs: 32,589 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	4,321 major competitor apps
useful	70	100	50	76 27,683 competing apps Median installs: 33,574 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,561 major competitor apps
calculation	72	100	43	64 5,305 competing apps Median installs: 28,825 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	344 major competitor apps
data	67	100	65	83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,589 major competitor apps
owners	72	100	43	64 5,455 competing apps Median installs: 19,351 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	265 major competitor apps
stored	73	100	61	68 9,220 competing apps Median installs: 34,766 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,026 major competitor apps
actual	72	100	44	66 6,933 competing apps Median installs: 33,245 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	696 major competitor apps
obtained	71	100	39	60 3,068 competing apps Median installs: 32,394 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	255 major competitor apps
properties	71	100	42	59 2,809 competing apps Median installs: 25,405 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	256 major competitor apps
property	73	100	45	68 9,341 competing apps Median installs: 36,968 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	963 major competitor apps
estimate	71	100	37	57 2,216 competing apps Median installs: 29,141 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	189 major competitor apps
since	72	100	47	70 12,517 competing apps Median installs: 25,908 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,001 major competitor apps
several	71	100	49	73 18,373 competing apps Median installs: 32,952 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,904 major competitor apps
resulting	70	100	37	54 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 27,605 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	124 major competitor apps
forestry	67	100	26	38 159 competing apps Median installs: 23,467 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	16 major competitor apps
necessary	72	100	47	70 12,883 competing apps Median installs: 30,377 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,171 major competitor apps
carbon	69	100	40	50 869 competing apps Median installs: 19,266 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	66 major competitor apps
slope	68	100	31	43 336 competing apps Median installs: 47,358 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	54 major competitor apps

App Description

Application for calculating carbon in forestry properties in the State of Jalisco

With this application, the owners of forest lands in the State of Jalisco can georeference their properties, using the GPS of their mobile phone, and obtain an estimate of the carbon stored in the soil, in the superficial biomass and the CO2e absorption potential. The application uses the Canopy Cover Density index, derived from Sentinel 2 satellite images, to estimate the remaining forest area of a property, and makes carbon calculations only on the actual forest area, since the covers used in the analysis are carried out using mathematical models of data obtained in previous years, it is necessary that the calculation be made on the current forest area of the property analyzed. In a complementary way, with the objective of having biodiversity criteria to evaluate the property, a fragmentation analysis is carried out, resulting in a table of degree of connectivity, and several geomorphometric indices are generated, such as slope and orientation, which will be useful in actions of conservation and restoration.