The Trump Suit Game
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 131 keywords for The Trump Suit Game in Google Play
The Trump Suit Game tracks 131 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 131 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 68.5, difficulty 49.7.
Two player fair trump game simulator without multiplayer
Tracked keywords
131
0 ranked • 131 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
68.5
Top keyword: needed
Avg difficulty
49.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 968
- 68.1
largest
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,165
- 68.3
changing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,233
- 67.9
almost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,047
- 67.8
called
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 813
Unranked opportunities
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 968
largest
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 1,165
changing
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.6 • Competitors: 1,233
almost
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Competitors: 1,047
called
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Competitors: 813
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
best
Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 65 | 100 | 67 | 86 113,236 competing apps Median installs: 62,750 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 19,366 major competitor apps |
| best | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 18,001 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| multiplayer | 20 | 100 | 64 | 67 8,384 competing apps Median installs: 176,834 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 2,383 major competitor apps |
| card | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 35,515 competing apps Median installs: 50,336 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,766 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 65 | 86 102,576 competing apps Median installs: 35,820 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 11,283 major competitor apps |
| library | 72 | 100 | 65 | 71 13,762 competing apps Median installs: 29,536 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,491 major competitor apps |
| try | 68 | 100 | 62 | 79 44,524 competing apps Median installs: 62,670 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 7,600 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 8,596 major competitor apps |
| learn | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 64,313 competing apps Median installs: 33,093 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,746 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 6,975 competing apps Median installs: 33,614 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 670 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 16,635 competing apps Median installs: 29,493 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,927 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| take | 66 | 100 | 63 | 85 93,453 competing apps Median installs: 41,741 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,676 major competitor apps |
| moment | 72 | 100 | 51 | 70 12,376 competing apps Median installs: 36,206 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,419 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 72 | 100 | 48 | 66 7,582 competing apps Median installs: 40,910 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 962 major competitor apps |
| today | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 35,039 competing apps Median installs: 28,691 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,372 major competitor apps |
| good | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 44,246 competing apps Median installs: 35,774 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,689 major competitor apps |
| match | 69 | 100 | 57 | 77 33,130 competing apps Median installs: 45,070 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 4,751 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 64 | 83 74,834 competing apps Median installs: 53,568 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 11,689 major competitor apps |
| always | 67 | 100 | 59 | 82 65,220 competing apps Median installs: 32,990 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 7,264 major competitor apps |
App Description
Two player fair trump game simulator without multiplayer
This app wants to be a trumps simulator that does not pair cards for two players, without multiplayer with Neapolitan cards.
What you are seeing is not the trump game as it is understood today, because today all the trump simulators say "you got the ace, good job" and that's it. What you are seeing is a fair and professional simulator, with a score updated in real time, so you can decide whether to "risk" or not consciously.
This trump wants to be hard core in the original sense of the term (that is, the possibility of changing the game at any moment with your own consciously made choices).
It has three levels of difficulties:
in case the CPU plays as seconds at level one plays always trump, or the lowest card.
In second and third level, instead, there is a patented greedy algorithm, the second level always plays at same mode, so is possibile recognize the cards that it has, the third level is imprevedibile, but all try to catch the largest amount of cards, so if it plays first it always try to play the card most hard to be taken.
If a new game is started, for example changing the level of difficulty, first player changes.
I'll explain how my patented algorithm works: there are 120 points in total, i.e. 4 aces worth 11 points each, 4 3 worth 10 points each, 4 10 worth 4 points each, 4 9 worth 3 points each, 4 8 that are worth 2 points each. Since math is not an opinion: 4*11+4*10=84. 4*4+4*3+4*2=16+12+8=36
84+36=120 total points
120/2 = 60, 61 points are needed to win
relying only on the loads you risk losing, because
84-61=23, you have to take almost all of them and leave only 23 points of loads
60-36=24, taking all other cards takes only 3 loads to win.
For winning, you have to learn the theory of taking the largest amounts of cards, which I invented when I was 18, with wxbriscola.
The Neapolitan deck is incorporated and at the moment it is the only one that can be used.
It is possible to make various customizations, including whether it is necessary to warn when the deck ends, whether the trump card can give points by starting the final minigame to grab it, the names of the players and the response time (that are saved) that must be between 1 and 10 seconds, otherwise you obtain a snackbar with the error, even if you insert a negative value, .
Currently the game is localized in english, french, portuguese, german, italian and spanish, for getting another localization it does not need to be reinstalled after changing the localization of android.
The end screen allows you to share the match result on twitter, but only of it's the second match and of level is 3.
This software, thanks to the latest dotnet, is partially sencient, so you can share the score of your plays on semantic internet or between IAs, or you can try to male your IA plays, it's called assisted mode.
Now is in hdr on supported devices.
