AOTrauma Orthogeriatrics
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 69 keywords for AOTrauma Orthogeriatrics in Google Play
AOTrauma Orthogeriatrics tracks 69 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 68 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.3, difficulty 40.9, best rank 8.
Educational tool for fragility fracture patient care
Tracked keywords
69
1 ranked • 68 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 8 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.3
Top keyword: contained
Avg difficulty
40.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 59.6
contained
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 102
- 64.8
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 203
- 62.1
aid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 376
- 65.5
release
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 841
- 65.8
improved
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 824
Unranked opportunities
contained
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Competitors: 102
patient
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 203
aid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 376
release
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.3 • Competitors: 841
improved
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 824
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 341,428 • Major competitors: 12,591
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
information
Total apps: 268,932 • Major competitors: 8,237
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
designed
Total apps: 259,959 • Major competitors: 8,489
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
users
Total apps: 135,619 • Major competitors: 5,443
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
content
Total apps: 132,156 • Major competitors: 6,208
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ao | 70 | 100 | 28 | 42 458 competing apps Median installs: 3,156 Avg rating: 4.3 | 8 | 8 | 20 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 57,149 competing apps Median installs: 4,948 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,390 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 56,413 competing apps Median installs: 1,428 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,760 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 135,619 competing apps Median installs: 1,433 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 5,443 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 102,398 competing apps Median installs: 1,539 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,040 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,313 competing apps Median installs: 1,430 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,149 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 34,147 competing apps Median installs: 1,260 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 914 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 268,932 competing apps Median installs: 1,211 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,237 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 259,959 competing apps Median installs: 857 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,489 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 132,156 competing apps Median installs: 2,396 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 6,208 major competitor apps |
| educational | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 61,271 competing apps Median installs: 1,129 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,168 major competitor apps |
| contained | 74 | 100 | 36 | 60 5,552 competing apps Median installs: 4,541 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 341,428 competing apps Median installs: 1,180 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 12,591 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 16,391 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 337 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 73 | 100 | 43 | 57 3,891 competing apps Median installs: 1,834 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| easier | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 54,709 competing apps Median installs: 1,661 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,310 major competitor apps |
| patient | 74 | 100 | 39 | 65 11,734 competing apps Median installs: 611 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 102,334 competing apps Median installs: 1,352 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,122 major competitor apps |
| managing | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 52,921 competing apps Median installs: 663 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,404 major competitor apps |
| aid | 74 | 100 | 39 | 62 7,927 competing apps Median installs: 2,910 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 376 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,309 competing apps Median installs: 473 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 399 major competitor apps |
| release | 74 | 100 | 47 | 65 12,969 competing apps Median installs: 3,701 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 841 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 58,097 competing apps Median installs: 4,010 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 3,326 major competitor apps |
| healthcare professionals | 72 | 100 | 32 | 54 2,300 competing apps Median installs: 470 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| updated | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 82,171 competing apps Median installs: 1,473 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,202 major competitor apps |
App Description
Educational tool for fragility fracture patient care
The primary audience is surgeons and surgical trainees and the content is also appropriate for other physicians and professionals who are involved in comanagement. All information contained in the Orthogers App is intended for preparing medical procedures and considering clinical options and not as an aid while carrying out medical procedures or making and implementing clinical decisions.
The content is presented solely for educational purposes (ie, it is NOT designed for making diagnostic or treatment decisions for any individual patient). Orthogers is not designed for laypersons and all users must read and accept the Terms, Conditions, and Disclaimers within the App.
Changes in this updated version (5.0)
- Easier access to content (shorter pathway to core information)
- Improved UI