Easy to Read Bible version
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 61 keywords for Easy to Read Bible version in Google Play
Easy to Read Bible version tracks 61 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 60 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.2, difficulty 48.2, best rank 148.
Bible easy to read & understand app offline
Tracked keywords
61
1 ranked • 60 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 148 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.2
Top keyword: done
Avg difficulty
48.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.9
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 937
- 68.6
house
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,581
- 68.7
translation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 844
- 67.5
prepared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 964
- 71.3
limited
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,812
Unranked opportunities
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Competitors: 937
house
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 1,581
translation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 844
prepared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 48.2 • Competitors: 964
limited
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 1,812
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
experience
Total apps: 118,077 • Major competitors: 15,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.8
many
Total apps: 96,753 • Major competitors: 12,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.9
world
Total apps: 95,834 • Major competitors: 14,277
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
including
Total apps: 66,643 • Major competitors: 8,693
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| easier | 70 | 100 | 62 | 75 25,194 competing apps Median installs: 31,651 Avg rating: 2.8 | 154 | 148 | 2,581 major competitor apps |
| offline | 68 | 100 | 60 | 81 54,787 competing apps Median installs: 36,532 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,486 major competitor apps |
| version | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,300 major competitor apps |
| easy | 64 | 100 | 62 | 89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 17,537 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 58 | 81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 57 | 79 39,640 competing apps Median installs: 36,260 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,807 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 118,077 competing apps Median installs: 39,819 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,561 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 59 | 76 29,667 competing apps Median installs: 31,657 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,542 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 24,331 competing apps Median installs: 30,717 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,732 major competitor apps |
| limited | 72 | 100 | 52 | 71 14,801 competing apps Median installs: 42,546 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,812 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 49,228 competing apps Median installs: 35,592 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,524 major competitor apps |
| including | 67 | 100 | 64 | 82 66,643 competing apps Median installs: 40,188 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,693 major competitor apps |
| special | 68 | 100 | 58 | 80 49,271 competing apps Median installs: 42,767 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 6,785 major competitor apps |
| founded | 71 | 100 | 37 | 58 2,454 competing apps Median installs: 14,421 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| english | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 24,206 competing apps Median installs: 32,062 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,931 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 65 | 79 40,134 competing apps Median installs: 37,748 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,404 major competitor apps |
| many | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 96,753 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 12,574 major competitor apps |
| book | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 32,371 competing apps Median installs: 24,485 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 2,333 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 71 | 100 | 49 | 74 20,163 competing apps Median installs: 33,595 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,141 major competitor apps |
| meet | 70 | 100 | 65 | 75 24,878 competing apps Median installs: 46,672 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,573 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 61 | 81 52,752 competing apps Median installs: 28,708 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,048 major competitor apps |
| clear | 69 | 100 | 55 | 78 34,357 competing apps Median installs: 27,922 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,323 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 55 | 68 9,413 competing apps Median installs: 31,328 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 937 major competitor apps |
| house | 73 | 100 | 49 | 69 10,302 competing apps Median installs: 50,858 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,581 major competitor apps |
| world | 66 | 100 | 64 | 85 95,834 competing apps Median installs: 48,488 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,277 major competitor apps |
App Description
Bible easy to read & understand app offline
The Easy-to-Read Version of the Bible, published in 1989 by the World Bible Translation Center—founded in 1973 in Arlington, Texas—was initially prepared to meet the special needs of the deaf and was first published by Baker Book House as The English Version for the Deaf. The first-draft work on The English Version for the Deaf was done by WBTC’s in-house translators who are Greek and Hebrew scholars and deaf-language consultants. The Easy-to-Read Version has also recently undergone a major revision to better meet the needs of its target audience and evangelistic outreach (via ministries to prisons, the homeless) as well as those with limited English. The revised text is also more suitable for oral reading, since many who understand spoken English are not literate.