Biblia NTV Traducción Viviente
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 62 keywords for Biblia NTV Traducción Viviente in Google Play
Biblia NTV Traducción Viviente tracks 62 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 61 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 49.2, best rank 191.
Holy Bible New Living Translation NTV
Tracked keywords
62
1 ranked • 61 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 191 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: translation
Avg difficulty
49.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
translation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 844
- 68.5
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 790
- 70.4
accessible
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.2 • Rank 191
Competitors: 1,134
- 67.3
combine
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,471
- 65.2
approach
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 440
Unranked opportunities
translation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.8 • Competitors: 844
relevant
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 59.5 • Competitors: 790
combine
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 50.7 • Competitors: 1,471
approach
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.7 • Competitors: 440
accuracy
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 591
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
help
Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
information
Total apps: 101,893 • Major competitors: 7,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.6
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
allows
Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| accessible | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 13,168 competing apps Median installs: 24,022 Avg rating: 2.7 | 191 | 191 | 1,134 major competitor apps |
| new | 64 | 100 | 66 | 90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 25,823 major competitor apps |
| word | 70 | 100 | 51 | 75 25,674 competing apps Median installs: 33,070 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,254 major competitor apps |
| version | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,300 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 59 | 76 29,667 competing apps Median installs: 31,657 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,542 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| strictly | 70 | 100 | 39 | 56 1,953 competing apps Median installs: 48,887 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 227 major competitor apps |
| modern | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 27,345 competing apps Median installs: 33,314 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,186 major competitor apps |
| hope | 71 | 100 | 46 | 71 15,172 competing apps Median installs: 25,738 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,067 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 66 | 87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,840 major competitor apps |
| note | 71 | 100 | 53 | 72 16,600 competing apps Median installs: 34,914 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,579 major competitor apps |
| combine | 72 | 100 | 51 | 67 8,726 competing apps Median installs: 57,555 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,471 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 50 | 75 26,120 competing apps Median installs: 28,202 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,913 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 71 | 100 | 54 | 73 18,485 competing apps Median installs: 37,329 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,447 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 65 | 79 40,134 competing apps Median installs: 37,748 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,404 major competitor apps |
| approach | 72 | 100 | 55 | 65 6,545 competing apps Median installs: 22,839 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 440 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 77,278 competing apps Median installs: 26,241 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,086 major competitor apps |
| original | 71 | 100 | 58 | 73 18,382 competing apps Median installs: 49,188 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,593 major competitor apps |
| clear | 69 | 100 | 55 | 78 34,357 competing apps Median installs: 27,922 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,323 major competitor apps |
| useful | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 27,683 competing apps Median installs: 33,574 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,561 major competitor apps |
| message | 71 | 100 | 63 | 72 16,436 competing apps Median installs: 33,873 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,775 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 72 | 100 | 44 | 65 6,215 competing apps Median installs: 31,033 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 591 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 62 | 85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 14,575 major competitor apps |
| important | 68 | 100 | 57 | 80 46,344 competing apps Median installs: 27,477 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,893 major competitor apps |
| style | 70 | 100 | 58 | 76 28,620 competing apps Median installs: 53,356 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 4,483 major competitor apps |
App Description
Holy Bible New Living Translation NTV
The NTV is a contemporary translation of the Bible that seeks to combine accuracy and fidelity to the original text with clear and accessible language for modern readers. It is based on the Hebrew and Greek text of the Old and New Testaments, respectively.
The NTV Bible uses a dynamic equivalency approach in its translation, which means that it seeks to convey the meaning of the original text rather than strictly adhering to a word-for-word translation. This allows the biblical message to be more understandable and relevant to contemporary readers.
The NTV Bible has gained popularity for its fluid and contemporary style of language, which makes it attractive to those looking for a more accessible reading of the Bible in Spanish. However, it is important to note that, as with any Bible translation, there may be interpretive differences and translation approaches that may vary between the different versions available.
I hope this information is useful to you. If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to help you.