UniDescription

Developer: Seattle MB, LLC

Category: Travel & Local

Add App to Comparison

2.3K installs

51 ratings

78 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +6.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 57 keywords for UniDescription in Google Play

Developer: Seattle MB, LLC (Montana Banana) Category: travel_and_local Rating: 4.59

UniDescription tracks 57 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 57 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 42.1.

Our goal is simple: “Audio Describe the World!”

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 57 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.3

Top keyword: university

Avg difficulty

42.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 178
66.1
print

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 585
65.4
universal

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 469
60.8
studies

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 123
61.4
dozens

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,009
62.3

Unranked opportunities

university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 178
print

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 585
universal

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 469
studies

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.3 • Competitors: 123
dozens

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 1,009

High competition keywords

access

Total apps: 340,622 • Major competitors: 12,539

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
designed

Total apps: 260,161 • Major competitors: 8,471

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
contact

Total apps: 139,013 • Major competitors: 6,345

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
service

Total apps: 134,568 • Major competitors: 5,772

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
full

Total apps: 129,272 • Major competitors: 7,493

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
audio	69	100	52	77 67,604 competing apps Median installs: 4,144 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	3,550 major competitor apps
contact	67	100	54	82 139,013 competing apps Median installs: 1,822 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	6,345 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	54	86 260,161 competing apps Median installs: 843 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	8,471 major competitor apps
created	70	100	48	76 55,678 competing apps Median installs: 1,995 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,182 major competitor apps
people	68	100	54	80 104,023 competing apps Median installs: 2,890 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	5,786 major competitor apps
service	67	100	54	82 134,568 competing apps Median installs: 1,410 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	5,772 major competitor apps
serve	73	100	43	68 18,555 competing apps Median installs: 1,112 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	802 major competitor apps
goal	70	100	47	74 43,361 competing apps Median installs: 1,284 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,935 major competitor apps
university	74	100	41	66 14,219 competing apps Median installs: 1,724 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	178 major competitor apps
access	65	100	59	88 340,622 competing apps Median installs: 1,166 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	12,539 major competitor apps
diverse	70	100	48	74 45,874 competing apps Median installs: 1,702 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,874 major competitor apps
print	74	100	46	65 12,862 competing apps Median installs: 2,612 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	585 major competitor apps
full	67	100	54	81 129,272 competing apps Median installs: 3,237 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	7,493 major competitor apps
project	72	100	43	69 22,149 competing apps Median installs: 749 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	549 major competitor apps
description	73	100	42	66 14,599 competing apps Median installs: 1,391 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	491 major competitor apps
learning	68	100	51	80 104,796 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	3,205 major competitor apps
research	73	100	47	67 16,483 competing apps Median installs: 1,750 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	608 major competitor apps
throughout	71	100	45	72 32,564 competing apps Median installs: 994 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,051 major competitor apps
universal	74	100	42	61 6,635 competing apps Median installs: 4,042 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	469 major competitor apps
council	73	100	34	56 3,424 competing apps Median installs: 995 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	41 major competitor apps
public	70	100	49	75 50,985 competing apps Median installs: 2,758 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	2,074 major competitor apps
studies	74	100	37	61 7,198 competing apps Median installs: 2,002 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	123 major competitor apps
dozens	74	100	46	62 8,218 competing apps Median installs: 12,752 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,009 major competitor apps
paper	73	100	47	68 17,896 competing apps Median installs: 2,954 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	895 major competitor apps
pacific	71	100	32	49 1,198 competing apps Median installs: 1,464 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	67 major competitor apps

App Description

Our goal is simple: “Audio Describe the World!”

This app shares prototype audio description from dozens of National Park Service sites throughout the country, translating their paper brochures into acoustic media, designed for people who are blind, visually impaired, print dyslexic, or who prefer learning through sound.

Everyone deserves full access to public discourse about public resources, and this University of Hawaii at Manoa (UH) research project has been created to serve diverse audiences, under the core principles of Universal Design.

Our sponsors include: The University of Hawaii, The National Park Service, Google, The American Council of the Blind, and The Hawaii-Pacific Islands Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit.

Core contributors include: Brett Oppegaard (Principal Investigator, UH), Megan Conway (Co-Pi, UH), Thomas Conway (Co-Pi, UH), Michele Hartley (Media Accessibility Coordinator, NPS), Joe Oppegaard (CTO, Montana Banana), Philipp Jordan (RA, UH), Tuyet Hayes (RA, UH), Sajja Koirala (RA, UH), and Terence Rose (RA, UH).

For more information, visit: www.unidescription.org

To contact the PI, email: brett.oppegaard@hawaii.edu