GOAT.AI - Task to AI Agents
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 144 keywords for GOAT.AI - Task to AI Agents in Google Play
GOAT.AI - Task to AI Agents tracks 144 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 144 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 48.4.
Free-flowing Autonomous AI
Tracked keywords
144
0 ranked • 144 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: task
Avg difficulty
48.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.6
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,156
- 68.1
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 755
- 67.8
month
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,041
- 68.6
written
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 478
- 69.4
weather
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 67.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,474
Unranked opportunities
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 61.2 • Competitors: 1,156
often
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 755
month
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.4 • Competitors: 1,041
written
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 478
weather
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 67.1 • Competitors: 1,474
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
best
Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
access
Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
without
Total apps: 113,596 • Major competitors: 12,654
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 18,001 major competitor apps |
| action | 71 | 100 | 64 | 73 19,490 competing apps Median installs: 64,156 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,588 major competitor apps |
| weather | 72 | 100 | 67 | 69 11,564 competing apps Median installs: 46,184 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,474 major competitor apps |
| art | 70 | 100 | 56 | 74 21,686 competing apps Median installs: 37,108 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,077 major competitor apps |
| connected | 70 | 100 | 56 | 74 22,704 competing apps Median installs: 25,700 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,181 major competitor apps |
| external | 72 | 100 | 55 | 66 6,882 competing apps Median installs: 37,392 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 869 major competitor apps |
| handle | 72 | 100 | 46 | 66 6,895 competing apps Median installs: 43,016 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 987 major competitor apps |
| events | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 26,075 competing apps Median installs: 21,064 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 2,499 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,913 competing apps Median installs: 20,150 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 52 | 72 16,253 competing apps Median installs: 32,717 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,542 major competitor apps |
| call | 70 | 100 | 64 | 76 26,309 competing apps Median installs: 41,916 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,361 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| serve | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,540 competing apps Median installs: 28,996 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 858 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 16,094 competing apps Median installs: 32,556 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,779 major competitor apps |
| note | 71 | 100 | 53 | 72 16,600 competing apps Median installs: 34,914 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,579 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| accessing | 72 | 100 | 43 | 63 4,608 competing apps Median installs: 26,230 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 425 major competitor apps |
| obtain | 72 | 100 | 44 | 66 6,975 competing apps Median installs: 33,614 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 670 major competitor apps |
| store | 69 | 100 | 60 | 78 34,411 competing apps Median installs: 36,549 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,003 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| task | 73 | 100 | 61 | 68 9,006 competing apps Median installs: 39,110 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,156 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 67 | 82 64,261 competing apps Median installs: 33,401 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,565 major competitor apps |
App Description
Free-flowing Autonomous AI
Example: "pick the best day next month for a 20km semi-marathon". AI will start collaborating: the Weather agent retrieves forecasts, the Web search agent identifies optimal running conditions, and the Wolfram agent calculates the "best day." It's the art of connected AI, simplifying complex tasks with sophistication.
LLMs as the central mainframe for autonomous agents is an intriguing concept. Demonstrations like AutoGPT, GPT-Engineer, and BabyAGI serve as simple illustrations of this idea. The potential of LLMs extends beyond generating or completing well-written copies, stories, essays and programs; they can be framed as powerful General Task Solvers, and that is what we aim to achieve in building the Goal Oriented Orchestration of Agent Taskforce (GOAT.AI)
For a goal-oriented orchestration of an LLM agent task force system to exist and function properly, three main core components of the system have to function properly
- Overview
1) Planning
- Subgoal and decomposition: The agent breaks down large tasks into smaller, manageable subgoals, making it easier to handle complex assignments efficiently.
- Reflection and refinement: The agent engages in self-critique and self-reflection on past actions, learns from mistakes, and improves approaches for future steps, thereby enhancing the overall quality of outcomes.
2) Memory
- Short-term memory: It refers to the amount of text the model can process before answering without any degradation in quality. In the current state, the LLMs can provide answers without any decrease in quality for approximately 128k tokens.
- Long-term memory: This enables the agent to store and recall an unlimited amount of information for the context over long periods. It is often achieved by using an external vector store for efficient RAG systems.
3) Action Space
- The agent acquires the ability to call external APIs to obtain additional information that is not available in the model weights (which are often difficult to modify after pre-training). This includes accessing current information, executing code, accessing proprietary information sources, and most importantly: invoking other agents for information retrieval.
- The action space also encompasses actions that are not aimed at retrieving something, but rather involve performing specific actions and obtaining the resulting outcome. Examples of such actions include sending emails, launching apps, opening front doors, and more. These actions are typically performed through various APIs. Additionally, it is important to note that agents can also invoke other agents for actionable events that they have access to.
