Another Tracking
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 94 keywords for Another Tracking in Google Play
Another Tracking tracks 94 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 93 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 46.6, best rank 16.
Another unofficial Traccar client with convenient reports and usability
Tracked keywords
94
1 ranked • 93 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: aimed
Avg difficulty
46.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.1
aimed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 168
- 66.0
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 397
- 61.3
admin
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 160
- 64.8
net
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 544
- 62.6
motivation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 236
Unranked opportunities
aimed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 168
api
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 397
admin
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 160
net
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.6 • Competitors: 544
motivation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 236
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 330,494 • Major competitors: 20,501
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
free
Total apps: 315,041 • Major competitors: 24,095
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.7
experience
Total apps: 282,658 • Major competitors: 16,683
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
information
Total apps: 264,413 • Major competitors: 8,150
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
best
Total apps: 250,470 • Major competitors: 18,391
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| another | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 36,163 competing apps Median installs: 4,404 Avg rating: 2.6 | 16 | 16 | 2,454 major competitor apps |
| free | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 315,041 competing apps Median installs: 5,777 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 24,095 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 57 | 86 250,470 competing apps Median installs: 4,208 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 18,391 major competitor apps |
| source | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 25,404 competing apps Median installs: 2,270 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,004 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 56,451 competing apps Median installs: 4,962 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,369 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 58 | 88 330,494 competing apps Median installs: 2,474 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 20,501 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 137,673 competing apps Median installs: 1,375 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 5,538 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 57 | 87 282,658 competing apps Median installs: 1,757 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 16,683 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 97,626 competing apps Median installs: 1,952 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,841 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 264,413 competing apps Median installs: 1,196 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 8,150 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,828 competing apps Median installs: 954 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 42,395 competing apps Median installs: 1,808 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,808 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 224,577 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 12,356 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 74,503 competing apps Median installs: 1,496 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 3,331 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 194,534 competing apps Median installs: 2,770 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 10,380 major competitor apps |
| api | 74 | 100 | 43 | 66 13,767 competing apps Median installs: 461 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 397 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 46 | 74 41,944 competing apps Median installs: 1,291 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,904 major competitor apps |
| clients | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 21,296 competing apps Median installs: 363 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 416 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,526 competing apps Median installs: 3,491 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,853 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 140,933 competing apps Median installs: 3,233 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 8,814 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 95,093 competing apps Median installs: 2,140 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 5,240 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 111,298 competing apps Median installs: 1,206 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,612 major competitor apps |
| vehicle | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 33,657 competing apps Median installs: 1,699 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,784 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 72 | 100 | 53 | 71 29,165 competing apps Median installs: 5,484 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,691 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 54 | 79 94,308 competing apps Median installs: 4,273 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 7,203 major competitor apps |
App Description
Another unofficial Traccar client with convenient reports and usability
This includes specific design choices in the interface and reports. Currently, I have implemented only the most basic reports yet, but I have aimed to make them as user-friendly as possible.
The app uses the capabilities of the device, you can enable the history of your movements, and the compasses show the direction and distance to the trackers.
The application works with any Traccar server. If you don't have your own running instance, you can test it on my free instance at maps.gps-free.net (open for registration and use without any restrictions). I have only implemented the client-side part in app, all administration tasks (adding users and trackers) need to be done in the Traccar admin console.
Friends! This is the first version of the application, and I'm not sure yet if there will be a demand for this native version of the Traccar interface. Your positive feedback and ratings are the best motivation for me to continue working on it! Additionally, please leave comments with your suggestions on what specific functionality should be implemented.
A native client allows for adding its own features and processing data additionally, even if such functionality is not available on the server.
If the application proves to be in demand, I will gradually add features that my clients use in other proprietary monitoring systems, such as functionality for agricultural producers or various fuel reports.
