Another Tracking
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 94 keywords for Another Tracking in Google Play
Another Tracking tracks 94 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 93 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.6, difficulty 51.1, best rank 16.
Another unofficial Traccar client with convenient reports and usability
Tracked keywords
94
1 ranked • 93 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: done
Avg difficulty
51.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.9
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 937
- 67.5
functionality
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 80.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 913
- 68.0
side
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,185
- 67.9
comments
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 885
- 69.3
source
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 959
Unranked opportunities
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Competitors: 937
functionality
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 80.5 • Competitors: 913
side
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.3 • Competitors: 1,185
comments
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 57.0 • Competitors: 885
source
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 959
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 173,844 • Major competitors: 23,343
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.4
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
best
Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
experience
Total apps: 118,077 • Major competitors: 15,561
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.8
features
Total apps: 116,743 • Major competitors: 14,116
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| another | 71 | 100 | 54 | 74 20,257 competing apps Median installs: 40,974 Avg rating: 3.0 | 16 | 16 | 2,627 major competitor apps |
| free | 64 | 100 | 64 | 90 173,844 competing apps Median installs: 46,597 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 23,343 major competitor apps |
| best | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 18,001 major competitor apps |
| source | 72 | 100 | 52 | 69 11,396 competing apps Median installs: 27,566 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 959 major competitor apps |
| version | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,300 major competitor apps |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 118,077 competing apps Median installs: 39,819 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,561 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 56 | 79 41,673 competing apps Median installs: 30,529 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,566 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 7,805 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 71 | 100 | 39 | 59 2,913 competing apps Median installs: 20,150 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 56 | 73 18,347 competing apps Median installs: 30,163 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,742 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| convenient | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 30,608 competing apps Median installs: 31,194 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,175 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 66 | 85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 9,952 major competitor apps |
| api | 71 | 100 | 46 | 61 3,812 competing apps Median installs: 21,435 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 16,094 competing apps Median installs: 32,556 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,779 major competitor apps |
| clients | 72 | 100 | 48 | 64 5,797 competing apps Median installs: 19,192 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 451 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 18,440 competing apps Median installs: 33,512 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,756 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 41,781 competing apps Median installs: 34,406 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,928 major competitor apps |
| interface | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 41,743 competing apps Median installs: 24,264 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,368 major competitor apps |
| vehicle | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 14,148 competing apps Median installs: 33,850 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,672 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 71 | 100 | 62 | 72 17,127 competing apps Median installs: 39,571 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,812 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,669 competing apps Median installs: 50,678 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,748 major competitor apps |
App Description
Another unofficial Traccar client with convenient reports and usability
This includes specific design choices in the interface and reports. Currently, I have implemented only the most basic reports yet, but I have aimed to make them as user-friendly as possible.
The app uses the capabilities of the device, you can enable the history of your movements, and the compasses show the direction and distance to the trackers.
The application works with any Traccar server. If you don't have your own running instance, you can test it on my free instance at maps.gps-free.net (open for registration and use without any restrictions). I have only implemented the client-side part in app, all administration tasks (adding users and trackers) need to be done in the Traccar admin console.
Friends! This is the first version of the application, and I'm not sure yet if there will be a demand for this native version of the Traccar interface. Your positive feedback and ratings are the best motivation for me to continue working on it! Additionally, please leave comments with your suggestions on what specific functionality should be implemented.
A native client allows for adding its own features and processing data additionally, even if such functionality is not available on the server.
If the application proves to be in demand, I will gradually add features that my clients use in other proprietary monitoring systems, such as functionality for agricultural producers or various fuel reports.