PPIF TPM
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 76 keywords for PPIF TPM in Google Play
PPIF TPM tracks 76 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 76 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 47.9.
Verify clinics reported services via (PPIF TPM)third-party monitoring.
Tracked keywords
76
0 ranked • 76 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: collected
Avg difficulty
47.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
collected
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 688
- 68.7
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 677
- 67.7
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,026
- 68.6
planning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 945
- 68.1
securely
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,110
Unranked opportunities
collected
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 688
field
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 677
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,026
planning
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.4 • Competitors: 945
securely
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Competitors: 1,110
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 163,352 • Major competitors: 21,922
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.0
data
Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
based
Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
provide
Total apps: 61,536 • Major competitors: 5,453
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
used
Total apps: 61,233 • Major competitors: 5,711
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offline | 68 | 100 | 60 | 81 54,787 competing apps Median installs: 36,532 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,486 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 32,694 competing apps Median installs: 29,240 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,918 major competitor apps | |
| make | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 163,352 competing apps Median installs: 42,108 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 21,922 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 58 | 81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| party | 72 | 100 | 60 | 70 13,146 competing apps Median installs: 59,582 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,168 major competitor apps |
| contact | 67 | 100 | 58 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 30,986 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,729 major competitor apps |
| organization | 72 | 100 | 43 | 64 5,339 competing apps Median installs: 18,076 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 326 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 59 | 81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 5,377 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,453 major competitor apps |
| clients | 72 | 100 | 48 | 64 5,797 competing apps Median installs: 19,192 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 451 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 53 | 73 18,440 competing apps Median installs: 33,512 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 1,756 major competitor apps |
| streamlines | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,112 competing apps Median installs: 15,766 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 60 | 79 41,533 competing apps Median installs: 33,567 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,686 major competitor apps |
| collected | 73 | 100 | 47 | 68 9,686 competing apps Median installs: 25,493 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 688 major competitor apps |
| photos | 69 | 100 | 68 | 77 34,126 competing apps Median installs: 44,996 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,901 major competitor apps |
| services | 69 | 100 | 64 | 78 38,598 competing apps Median installs: 28,828 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,045 major competitor apps |
| provision | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,138 competing apps Median installs: 22,396 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| validation | 69 | 100 | 32 | 49 773 competing apps Median installs: 21,536 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| partner | 72 | 100 | 49 | 69 10,634 competing apps Median installs: 32,994 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,035 major competitor apps |
| service providers | 70 | 100 | 34 | 53 1,216 competing apps Median installs: 15,142 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| informed | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 16,326 competing apps Median installs: 20,770 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,194 major competitor apps |
| progress | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 27,030 competing apps Median installs: 29,906 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,895 major competitor apps |
App Description
Verify clinics reported services via (PPIF TPM)third-party monitoring.
What you can do
Verify reported clients and availed services
Record outcomes with time-stamped, geo-tagged entries
Capture consent and evidence (notes and photos where permitted)
Identify discrepancies in client records
Work offline in the field and sync when online
View progress and basic summaries of completed verifications
Sign in securely with organization-issued credentials
Who it’s for
Restricted to PPIF/partner monitoring teams.
Not for public use; a registered account is required.
Privacy & safety
Location is used during verification to confirm on-site visits.
Evidence (e.g., photos) is collected only under approved protocols.
Data is encrypted in transit and stored on organization servers.
No ads.
Important
This app supports monitoring & evaluation. It does not provide medical advice or clinical services.
Support & access: contact your PPIF focal person or email contech@contech.org.pk