Co-Pod

Developer: UK Centre for

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

72 installs

Ratings not yet available

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Monthly +1.00

Steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 58 keywords for Co-Pod in Google Play

Developer: UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Category: tools Rating: 2.33

Co-Pod tracks 58 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 58 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.4, difficulty 40.9.

Improving Cocoa production

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 58 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.4

Top keyword: productivity

Avg difficulty

40.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

productivity

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 425
65.5
accessing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 347
63.6
university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 169
66.1
communities

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 164
61.8
produced

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 132
59.8

Unranked opportunities

productivity

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 425
accessing

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 347
university

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
communities

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Competitors: 164
produced

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 132

High competition keywords

experience

Total apps: 289,044 • Major competitors: 15,346

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
mobile

Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
information

Total apps: 266,609 • Major competitors: 7,571

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
support

Total apps: 169,442 • Major competitors: 7,314

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
including

Total apps: 130,038 • Major competitors: 7,024

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
productivity	74	100	50	65 12,898 competing apps Median installs: 508 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	425 major competitor apps
support	67	100	55	83 169,442 competing apps Median installs: 1,290 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,314 major competitor apps
experience	65	100	58	87 289,044 competing apps Median installs: 1,501 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	15,346 major competitor apps
particularly	73	100	36	58 4,467 competing apps Median installs: 1,532 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	108 major competitor apps
information	65	100	55	86 266,609 competing apps Median installs: 1,036 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	7,571 major competitor apps
management	68	100	50	80 110,628 competing apps Median installs: 502 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	2,438 major competitor apps
include	71	100	48	72 32,101 competing apps Median installs: 2,143 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	1,302 major competitor apps
mobile	65	100	56	87 280,152 competing apps Median installs: 1,245 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	10,258 major competitor apps
including	67	100	57	81 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 2,121 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	7,024 major competitor apps
accessing	74	100	40	64 9,793 competing apps Median installs: 1,694 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	347 major competitor apps
university	74	100	41	66 14,113 competing apps Median installs: 1,534 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	169 major competitor apps
smart	68	100	56	81 121,074 competing apps Median installs: 1,460 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	5,894 major competitor apps
el	73	100	37	58 4,604 competing apps Median installs: 1,484 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	161 major competitor apps
nature	73	100	43	67 16,412 competing apps Median installs: 1,837 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	636 major competitor apps
required	71	100	55	74 41,858 competing apps Median installs: 3,200 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	2,234 major competitor apps
project	72	100	44	69 21,930 competing apps Median installs: 681 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	507 major competitor apps
term	73	100	44	69 20,074 competing apps Median installs: 2,019 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	843 major competitor apps
long	69	100	52	77 64,202 competing apps Median installs: 2,141 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	3,491 major competitor apps
shifting	71	100	33	50 1,453 competing apps Median installs: 1,768 Avg rating: 2.0	—	—	85 major competitor apps
ensure	69	100	52	77 71,148 competing apps Median installs: 873 Avg rating: 1.8	—	—	2,356 major competitor apps
focused	72	100	45	71 28,541 competing apps Median installs: 599 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	791 major competitor apps
monitoring	72	100	43	71 27,261 competing apps Median installs: 606 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	568 major competitor apps
research	73	100	48	67 16,325 competing apps Median installs: 1,511 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	583 major competitor apps
communities	74	100	54	62 7,545 competing apps Median installs: 566 Avg rating: 1.7	—	—	164 major competitor apps
produced	74	100	43	60 5,695 competing apps Median installs: 1,482 Avg rating: 1.9	—	—	132 major competitor apps

App Description

Improving Cocoa production

Co-Pod is a cocoa farmer focused mobile application that has been co-produced with farmer communities in Ghana. The intention is to support farmers accessing relevant farm management information and gaining experience monitoring their own farms to realise locally relevant climate smart cocoa cultivation. This is particularly pertinent as the regional climate is changing, including more intense dry seasons, shifting rainy seasons and more intense El Nino events. Adaptation of practices is required to ensure continued productivity and long term resilience of the sector. Project partners include the Nature Conservation Research Centre (NCRC) in Ghana and the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), University of Dundee and Flumens Ltd in Europe.