FIT Count
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 63 keywords for FIT Count in Google Play
FIT Count tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 42.0.
10-minute survey to collect new data on numbers of flower-visiting insects
Tracked keywords
63
0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: university
Avg difficulty
42.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 169
- 63.6
urban
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 485
- 66.1
count
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 628
- 59.9
uk
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 250
- 60.3
maybe
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 592
Unranked opportunities
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 169
urban
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 485
count
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 48.9 • Competitors: 628
uk
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 250
maybe
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 592
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
new
Total apps: 368,929 • Major competitors: 21,444
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
help
Total apps: 282,188 • Major competitors: 14,387
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.7
track
Total apps: 195,706 • Major competitors: 5,779
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
data
Total apps: 181,410 • Major competitors: 6,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 65 | 100 | 60 | 89 368,929 competing apps Median installs: 2,547 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 21,444 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 27,783 competing apps Median installs: 1,238 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,013 major competitor apps |
| collect | 69 | 100 | 54 | 78 77,599 competing apps Median installs: 3,435 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 5,807 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,786 competing apps Median installs: 1,281 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,681 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 282,188 competing apps Median installs: 1,657 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 14,387 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,157 competing apps Median installs: 1,522 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| reading | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 51,564 competing apps Median installs: 3,017 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,862 major competitor apps |
| trust | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 18,217 competing apps Median installs: 1,326 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 862 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 54 | 84 195,706 competing apps Median installs: 509 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 5,779 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 67,671 competing apps Median installs: 1,502 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,898 major competitor apps |
| suitable | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 44,882 competing apps Median installs: 2,402 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,131 major competitor apps |
| fit | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 29,533 competing apps Median installs: 1,604 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,525 major competitor apps |
| much | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 111,742 competing apps Median installs: 1,459 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,278 major competitor apps |
| minute | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 18,141 competing apps Median installs: 1,445 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 832 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 50 | 68 17,925 competing apps Median installs: 2,328 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 807 major competitor apps |
| numbers | 72 | 100 | 47 | 70 26,611 competing apps Median installs: 2,277 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,269 major competitor apps |
| project | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 22,048 competing apps Median installs: 662 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 508 major competitor apps |
| identify | 72 | 100 | 52 | 70 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 1,278 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 983 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 58 | 84 181,410 competing apps Median installs: 1,151 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,597 major competitor apps |
| monitoring | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 27,449 competing apps Median installs: 596 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 570 major competitor apps |
| even | 67 | 100 | 59 | 83 157,439 competing apps Median installs: 3,382 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 10,553 major competitor apps |
| research | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,394 competing apps Median installs: 1,495 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 583 major competitor apps |
| able | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 77,031 competing apps Median installs: 1,794 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 3,303 major competitor apps |
| broad | 73 | 100 | 37 | 57 3,545 competing apps Median installs: 1,264 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 130 major competitor apps |
App Description
10-minute survey to collect new data on numbers of flower-visiting insects
Wild pollinators may have declined in the UK by more than 30% since 1980, but we need much more data to be able to track changes in abundance. You can help by doing a FIT Count, maybe even repeating it over the season. You don’t need to identify the insects to species level, only to within broad groups e.g. bumblebees, hoverflies, butterflies & moths, wasps
The FIT Count is part of the UK Pollinator Monitoring Scheme (PoMS), within the UK Pollinator Monitoring and Research Partnership which comprises the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH), Bumblebee Conservation Trust, Butterfly Conservation, British Trust for Ornithology, Hymettus, Reading University, University of Leeds and Natural History Museum. PoMS is jointly funded by Defra, the Welsh and Scottish Governments, Daera, JNCC and project partners.