Erosional Velocity Calculator

Developer: Webbusterz Engineering

Category: Productivity

33 installs

ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 71 keywords for Erosional Velocity Calculator in Google Play

Developer: Webbusterz Engineering Category: productivity

Erosional Velocity Calculator tracks 71 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 71 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.4, difficulty 46.8.

Calculate the Erosional velocity for a fluid in pipes as per API RP 14E

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 71 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.4

Top keyword: calculate

Avg difficulty

46.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 742
68.2
room

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,553
68.5
input

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 830
68.3
operation

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 724
66.8
minimum

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 809
64.9

Unranked opportunities

calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 742
room

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,553
input

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Competitors: 830
operation

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 46.6 • Competitors: 724
minimum

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 809

High competition keywords

different

Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
us

Total apps: 96,924 • Major competitors: 10,444

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
available

Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
see

Total apps: 78,341 • Major competitors: 9,101

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.4
based

Total apps: 67,175 • Major competitors: 6,592

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
travel	71	100	53	73 19,416 competing apps Median installs: 36,438 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,459 major competitor apps
version	69	100	61	77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,300 major competitor apps
clean	71	100	54	71 14,967 competing apps Median installs: 36,083 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,821 major competitor apps
connection	69	100	60	76 29,202 competing apps Median installs: 32,388 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,022 major competitor apps
service	68	100	59	81 54,184 competing apps Median installs: 29,877 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	5,377 major competitor apps
available	66	100	66	85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	9,952 major competitor apps
api	71	100	46	61 3,812 competing apps Median installs: 21,435 Avg rating: 3.3	—	—	360 major competitor apps
process	70	100	50	74 20,843 competing apps Median installs: 26,049 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,825 major competitor apps
operation	72	100	47	67 8,140 competing apps Median installs: 28,702 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	724 major competitor apps
minimum	72	100	47	65 6,312 competing apps Median installs: 46,880 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	809 major competitor apps
contain	72	100	56	65 6,736 competing apps Median installs: 34,474 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	630 major competitor apps
see	67	100	68	84 78,341 competing apps Median installs: 34,000 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	9,101 major competitor apps
internet	67	100	57	82 62,322 competing apps Median installs: 30,196 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,670 major competitor apps
following	69	100	58	77 33,448 competing apps Median installs: 32,090 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	3,198 major competitor apps
higher	72	100	62	69 11,562 competing apps Median installs: 37,376 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,534 major competitor apps
units	71	100	43	62 4,147 competing apps Median installs: 31,383 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	477 major competitor apps
calculate	73	100	46	68 9,840 competing apps Median installs: 26,954 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	742 major competitor apps
different	66	100	62	85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,575 major competitor apps
important	68	100	57	80 46,344 competing apps Median installs: 27,477 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	3,893 major competitor apps
provided	70	100	49	75 23,750 competing apps Median installs: 29,607 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,862 major competitor apps
constant	71	100	45	62 4,167 competing apps Median installs: 30,205 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	444 major competitor apps
based	67	100	63	82 67,175 competing apps Median installs: 30,073 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,592 major competitor apps
define	71	100	40	59 2,826 competing apps Median installs: 31,286 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	318 major competitor apps
per	71	100	51	73 17,531 competing apps Median installs: 42,420 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,028 major competitor apps
recommended	72	100	47	69 11,062 competing apps Median installs: 42,806 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,242 major competitor apps

App Description

Calculate the Erosional velocity for a fluid in pipes as per API RP 14E

Process engineers calculate Erosional velocity in pipes to define the maximum velocity that a fluid can travel in a pipeline and based on finding they define an operational velocity limit. This is important as higher velocities can cause pipe erosion over time. This application uses a common recommended practice equations that are provided in API RP 14E to estimate the erosional velocity, having said recommended practice, it's important to point out that different operators have their own guidelines on this issue, if you see any room for improving this application let me know.

The application will calculate following:
+ Mixture Density
+ Erosional velocity
+ Minimum pipe cross sectional area

The input is available in SI and US Units of measurement.
If the Mixture density is defined the application will not calculate the Cross sectional area, to calculate the mixture density and the cross sectional area, extra input is needed, Operation Temperature, Pressure, Gas/Liquid ratio, gas compressibility factor, gas specific gravity and liquid specific gravity.

The erosional velocity calculator also has predefined set values of the equation empirical constant "C" for the following set of service conditions
Continuous non-corrosive service - (Factor available assumes clean fluid and carbon steel pipe material)
Intermittent non-corrosive service - (Factor available assumes clean fluid and carbon steel pipe material)
Continuous corrosive service - (Factor available assumes clean fluid and corrosion resistant pipe material)
Intermittent corrosive service - (Factor available assumes clean fluid and corrosion resistant pipe material)

THIS VERSION OF THE APPLICATION DOESN'T REQUIRE INTERNET CONNECTION AND DOESN'T CONTAIN ANY ADVERTS.