Cardiac CT Appropriate Use Criteria

Category: Medical

Cardiac CT Appropriate Use Criteria icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 71 keywords for Cardiac CT Appropriate Use Criteria in Apple App Store

Developer: ferrazza Category: medical Rating: 4.99

Cardiac CT Appropriate Use Criteria tracks 71 keywords (3 keywords rank; 68 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.0, difficulty 39.4, best rank 11.

Tracked keywords

3 ranked • 68 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 11 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: patient

Avg difficulty

39.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 33
64.0
intuitive interface

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 64
64.7
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 114
67.2
calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 87
67.8
final

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 100
64.9

Unranked opportunities

patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 33
intuitive interface

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 64
needed

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 114
calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 87
final

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 100

High competition keywords

find

Total apps: 139,104 • Major competitors: 2,765

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
simple

Total apps: 98,968 • Major competitors: 1,441

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
take

Total apps: 95,526 • Major competitors: 1,742

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
whether

Total apps: 89,814 • Major competitors: 1,087

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
account

Total apps: 81,354 • Major competitors: 2,100

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
appropriate	72	100	39	63 6,013 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	11	11	54 major competitor apps
criteria	70	100	37	53 1,478 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	14	14	26 major competitor apps
uses	71	100	44	73 21,867 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	108	106	244 major competitor apps
order	68	100	51	80 60,309 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	792 major competitor apps
whether	67	100	52	83 89,814 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,087 major competitor apps
created	70	100	46	74 26,406 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	302 major competitor apps
list	69	100	48	77 40,598 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	496 major competitor apps
find	66	100	55	86 139,104 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,765 major competitor apps
intuitive	68	100	48	79 51,121 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	603 major competitor apps
multiple	68	100	51	81 68,625 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,107 major competitor apps
account	67	100	53	82 81,354 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,100 major competitor apps
take	67	100	53	83 95,526 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,742 major competitor apps
patients	72	100	38	62 5,417 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	36 major competitor apps
interface	69	100	47	77 39,818 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	327 major competitor apps
text	69	100	50	77 40,899 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	607 major competitor apps
many	67	100	51	82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,352 major competitor apps
provides	67	100	49	81 72,728 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	564 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	39	64 6,705 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	33 major competitor apps
intuitive interface	73	100	39	65 7,335 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	64 major competitor apps
simple	67	100	52	84 98,968 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,441 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	50	82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	658 major competitor apps
needed	73	100	42	67 10,337 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	114 major competitor apps
choice	72	100	45	71 16,343 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	315 major competitor apps
work	68	100	50	79 56,073 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	871 major competitor apps
must	70	100	46	75 28,591 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	496 major competitor apps

App Description

Cardiac CT is an application created to simplify the evaluation of patients undergoing to cardiac computer tomography. The decision whether to refer a patient to an investigation as cardiac CT is very complex and must take into account several factors. Many consensus of experts have been produced in order to classify the indications as appropriate or inappropriate. This application is based on the consensus of the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) published on 2010, that analyzed 60 indications to cardiac CT categorized in appropriate, inappropriate and uncertain. This application uses the algorithms on that work and provides a simple and intuitive interface that allows to find an indication in a few touches.
Starting with a list of possible clinical scenarios you get the final indication that the is classified as appropriate, inappropriate and uncertain.
In some decision passages you'll need to calculate the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD risk) and the Duke Treadmill Score. In these cases the application provides you specific cards with multiple choice text fields to automatically calculate the needed value.