Unconfined Test
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 96 keywords for Unconfined Test in Apple App Store
Unconfined Test tracks 96 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 96 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 39.9.
Tracked keywords
96
0 ranked • 96 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: displayed
Avg difficulty
39.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.4
displayed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 68
- 68.3
continue
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 203
- 68.1
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 104
- 68.3
stress
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 252
- 63.3
wireless
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
Unranked opportunities
displayed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 68
continue
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 203
perform
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 104
stress
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 252
wireless
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 84
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
real
Total apps: 87,189 • Major competitors: 1,770
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
data
Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
easily
Total apps: 85,676 • Major competitors: 1,259
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| connected | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,135 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| place | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 47,069 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 44,654 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 594 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| connect | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 60,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 937 major competitor apps |
| rate | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 20,106 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 305 major competitor apps |
| account | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 81,354 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,100 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 22,792 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
| small | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 23,426 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,610 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 710 major competitor apps |
| test results | 69 | 100 | 29 | 48 704 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 85,676 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,259 major competitor apps |
| apply | 72 | 100 | 49 | 70 14,857 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 372 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 87,189 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,770 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 658 major competitor apps |
| user | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 66,932 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 967 major competitor apps |
| threshold | 69 | 100 | 29 | 47 616 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| preparation | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,152 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 28,591 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| equipped | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 4,893 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| displayed | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,278 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 68 major competitor apps |
| display | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,939 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 212 major competitor apps |
| continue | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 11,986 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
App Description
All steps of test preparation can be easily read and transmitted to the application for ease-of-use. The operator can place a calibrated specimen in the Point Load Testing System for calibration of the crosshead position. The application uses a two-point calibration for the crosshead position.
By simply placing the specimen in the apparatus and applying a small load, the height of the specimen can be automatically measured. The user can continue to apply a load to the specimen, as the application will automatically begin the test once the height has been measured at the threshold load.
The application automatically records the load and the height of the specimen during the test and creates a graph of the data in real-time. The unconfined compressive strength of the specimen will be automatically calculated and displayed at the end of the test. The application calculates and records the stress and strain on the specimen during testing, and a graph of this data can also be viewed in real-time. It also automatically calculates the Tangent Modulus at 50% strength. A real time display of the loading rate helps the user apply loads at the appropriate rate.
After performing the test, the data can be emailed direction from the application as a CSV spreadsheet. Test results are also saved in the application for later viewing.
This application also makes automatic corrections to the data to account for the frame deformation compliance. This correction gives the frame a “Virtual Infinite Stiffness” and all results are presented with this correction already performed. This means that the results given are extremely accurate.
This application must connect once to a GCTS Wireless Point Load Testing System before it can be used. Once it has connected to a system, the application may be opened and data may be viewed from any location.