The eFACE

Developer: Massachusetts Eye and

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

50 installs

1.00 ratings

4.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 31 keywords for The eFACE in Apple App Store

Developer: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Category: medical Rating: 2

The eFACE tracks 31 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 31 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 39.7.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 31 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: movement

Avg difficulty

39.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

movement

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 60
65.1
regarding

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 73
63.3
scores

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 156
66.7
obtain

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 65
61.7
function

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 156
69.3

Unranked opportunities

movement

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 60
regarding

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 73
scores

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 156
obtain

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 65
function

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 156

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
using

Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
designed

Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
data

Total apps: 86,751 • Major competitors: 1,000

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
provide

Total apps: 55,996 • Major competitors: 558

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
analog	71	100	34	53 1,570 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	26 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	502 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	52	85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,080 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,548 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,966 major competitor apps
provide	68	100	49	79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	558 major competitor apps
video	69	100	51	78 46,368 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	888 major competitor apps
obtain	72	100	38	62 4,833 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	65 major competitor apps
function	72	100	42	69 13,888 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	156 major competitor apps
dynamic	71	100	45	72 18,821 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	286 major competitor apps
patients	72	100	38	62 5,417 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	36 major competitor apps
visual	71	100	45	73 24,454 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	301 major competitor apps
data	67	100	51	83 86,751 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,000 major competitor apps
graphs	71	100	36	57 2,651 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	34 major competitor apps
instrument	72	100	37	58 3,020 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	24 major competitor apps
movement	73	100	40	65 7,815 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	60 major competitor apps
graphic	72	100	39	60 3,595 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	67 major competitor apps
regarding	73	100	39	63 6,064 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	73 major competitor apps
rated	71	100	43	58 2,905 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	149 major competitor apps
scores	73	100	42	67 9,655 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	156 major competitor apps
facial	72	100	40	60 3,635 competing apps Median installs: 1,050 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	77 major competitor apps
separate	72	100	39	63 5,831 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	102 major competitor apps
afterwards	68	100	24	39 224 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1 major competitor apps
examination	70	100	32	53 1,457 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	1 major competitor apps
rapid	72	100	37	58 3,069 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	29 major competitor apps

App Description

Application designed to provide rapid quantitative and graphic depiction of facial function scores in patients suffering from unilateral facial paralysis, using visual analog scales. The instrument is divided into resting (static) readings, dynamic movement readings, and synkinesis (misrouting) scores.

During real-time examination of the patient, or afterwards from a video clip of facial movements, the app can be used to obtain clinician-rated scores for 16 separate facial function features. Graphs provide data regarding resting facial positions, and dynamic facial movements, and synkinesis features.