CTisus Pancreas Mass Checklist
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 92 keywords for CTisus Pancreas Mass Checklist in Apple App Store
CTisus Pancreas Mass Checklist tracks 92 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 91 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 40.8, best rank 98.
Tracked keywords
92
1 ranked • 91 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 98 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: age
Avg difficulty
40.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.4
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 191
- 64.1
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
- 62.1
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 35
- 68.5
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 257
- 66.7
exam
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 25
Unranked opportunities
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 191
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 84
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Competitors: 35
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 257
exam
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 25
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 176,016 • Major competitors: 3,926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
help
Total apps: 162,244 • Major competitors: 2,472
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
like
Total apps: 153,385 • Major competitors: 3,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
experience
Total apps: 135,700 • Major competitors: 2,192
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
share
Total apps: 123,163 • Major competitors: 1,808
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mass | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,621 competing apps Median installs: 394 Avg rating: 4.1 | 99 | 98 | 27 major competitor apps |
| free | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 176,016 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,926 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 55 | 85 123,163 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,808 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 89,248 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,093 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,454 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 713 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 135,700 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,192 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,735 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| scan | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 24,181 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 423 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| valuable | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,529 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 160 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 43 | 66 9,909 competing apps Median installs: 462 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,830 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 560 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 22,265 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 316 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,244 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,472 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,723 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 729 major competitor apps |
| volume | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,137 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,789 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 92 major competitor apps |
| patients | 73 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,407 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 35 major competitor apps |
| series | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 13,149 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| exam | 73 | 100 | 40 | 67 10,253 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 72,748 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,229 major competitor apps |
| structured | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,046 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| hands | 72 | 100 | 39 | 62 5,080 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| many | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 76,885 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,358 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 58,826 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 786 major competitor apps |
App Description
1. Have a better understanding of a structured approach to the evaluation of a suspected pancreatic mass.
2. Have a more complete understanding of the various topics that need to be considered when evaluation of a suspected mass on CT is performed.
3. Understand how "checklists" may be a valuable tool for Radiologists analyzing CT scans.
4. Understand how a systematic approach to CT scan analysis can improve our accuracy in specific clinical applications like "suspected pancreatic tumor".
Although we recognize that there is more than one correct approach we provide our experience from a high volume Pancreatic Imaging Center where we see or evaluate 10-30 patients a day or more.
We look forward to your suggestions and will provide updates with user feedback so feel free to share your thought with us.